The Project Gutenberg eBook of The run
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.
Title: The run
Author: John Hay
Illustrator: David Grose
Release date: October 17, 2025 [eBook #77074]
Language: English
Original publication: Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc, 1959
Credits: Steve Mattern and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE RUN ***
THE RUN
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
The Run
JOHN HAY
Doubleday & Company, Inc.
Garden City, New York
1959
_Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 59-11598_
_Copyright © 1959 by John Hay_
_All Rights Reserved_
_Printed in the United States of America_
_First Edition_
To my father and mother:
Clarence Leonard Hay
and
Alice Appleton Hay
FOREWORD
This book mirrors an attempt to go farther afield, from one man’s
center. Its writing represented a kind of migration in itself. We all
undertake them, whether we like it or not, near or far. To follow on
the track of fish, birds, or any other animals, might be both discovery
and repetition, because it might mean to go exhaustively into the
nature of being alive. The alewives helped to open the world for me,
although the outcome of their circling was always beyond knowing.
Above all this book is about one race which has an equal status with
us in the great motions of this planet. Men may be highest, or so men
say, but they cannot be complete without granting equal dignity to the
unsurpassed uniqueness of other forms of life. One ought to be able to
say: “Here is a life not mine. I am enriched.”
Not a great deal has been written specifically about alewives, but the
three published works I found most useful as an introduction were:
_Fishes of the Gulf of Maine_, by Bigelow and Schroeder,
published by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service; _A Report on
the Alewife Fisheries of Massachusetts_, by David Belding,
published by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation in 1921; and
_Factors Influencing the Migration of Anadromous Fishes_,
by Gerald Collins, Fishery Bulletin No. 73 of the Fish and Wildlife
Service. I also received some helpful information from the Fisheries
Research Board of Canada; and the Department of Sea and Shore Fisheries
of the State of Maine, as well as its Department of Inland Fisheries
and Game. Maine has been undertaking an important research and
educational program with a view to rehabilitating the alewife fisheries.
I am greatly indebted to Hal Turner of Woods Hole, Dr. David Belding
of Welfleet, and John Burns of the Massachusetts Department of Natural
Resources, Division of Marine Fisheries, for answering my questions so
readily and courteously; and of course, much thanks to Harry Alexander.
He guards a good run.
CONTENTS
Foreword 5
I Waiting Weather 9
II Arrival 19
III Dried Fish: an Informal History 27
IV The Reproductive Urge 45
V The Nature of an Alewife 53
VI Puzzles and Speculations 63
VII Port of Entry 75
VIII The Common Night 83
IX The Hunt 89
X Transition: Salt and Fresh 99
XI Up the Valley 111
XII The Imperfect Ladder 121
XIII Persistence 129
XIV Spawning: the Dance 141
XV The Return 151
XVI The Young Follow After 161
XVII The Power of Fragility 175
XVIII Going Out 183
I
Waiting Weather
It was in March, in comparative ignorance about their lives and habits,
that I started looking for the alewives. This is the time of year when
a few forerunners usually come in from the sea, in spite of the cold
airs and waters that still grip the narrow land of Cape Cod. I had
seen these migrant fish before, during a previous season, but from the
road, so to speak. I had never followed them as if they challenged
communication.
The place I started from was the Herring Run in the town of Brewster,
part of a little migratory inland route by which the alewives travel up
from Cape Cod Bay to the inland ponds where they spawn. At the Herring
Run the waters of Stony Brook pour down from an outlet north of these
ponds--three of them, all interconnected: Walkers, Upper Mill, and
Lower Mill. The flow then goes over a one-and-a-half-mile stretch,
first over the fishway, a series of concrete ladders and resting pools
built through rocks and high land, the area of the Herring Run, then
through a valley of abandoned cranberry bogs bounded by low hills; and
finally it elbows through tidal marshes to Paine’s Creek, its mouth
on Cape Cod Bay. This little river was called Sauquatuckett by the
Indians and was subsequently known as the Setuckett River, Mill Brook,
and Winslow’s Brook. At its falling headwaters the first water mill in
this region was built, and one of the later mill buildings is still
standing--it has an old water wheel that is still in working order and
is used to grind corn as a tourist attraction. By the time the mass of
tourists arrive the alewife migration, aside from the “fry,” hatched in
the ponds and returning to salt water, has about run its course. They
can still take pictures of the old mill in July or August, but they
have probably missed a more vital antiquity.
[Illustration]
The initial facts about the migration are these: each year, close
in time to the vernal equinox when the sun crosses the equator and
day and night are of equal length, this member of the herring family
begins to enter innumerable inlets and tidal estuaries down the
length of the Atlantic coast, from Newfoundland to the Carolinas.
Scientifically known as _Pomolobus pseudoharengus_ (also, under an
older classification, _Alosa pseudoharengus_, along with species
of shad), the alewife is an “anadromous” fish, meaning that like the
salmon and shad, but unlike its relative the sea herring, it grows in
salt water but leaves it as a three- or four-year-old adult, to spawn
in fresh. A “catadromous” fish, like the eel, does just the opposite,
growing up in fresh water and spawning in the sea.
The alewives, I learned, were due to come in from the Bay when the
temperature of the brackish water that flowed into it was warmer than
that of the salt water. In fact, a local resident had already noticed
a group of eight or ten alewives of apparently large size that had
appeared in the brook a few days before. Their arrival was a token
that the land, though still cold, was warming up more quickly than the
sea--just about the time a few male red-winged blackbirds showed up
too, in advance of housekeeping. But if some began their migration in
March, the first big run was not likely to come until the middle of
April or later, depending on how long and cold a winter it had been.
During an exceptionally cold season the alewives might not appear in
volume until the first days in May. Where were they now, and what were
they doing? Schooling somewhere offshore, and waiting to move in?
I stood on the beach and the sea still looked and felt and smelled
as raw and cold as winter--iron-gray, massive, keeping its
counsels--although, as I understood it in an incomplete way, the waters
were undergoing seasonal adjustments at varying depths in the shallow
coastal areas. Spring changes would begin to take effect. Perhaps I
knew them, smelled them, on the sea wind. I was impatient. I wondered
what specific combination of length of life, biological responses,
currents, tides, the composition of the sea water, might impel one
roving school of fish to leave the sea and start inland.
March, that season of the whole air hesitating and blowing back and
forth, the circuit of the compass, especially in low-wooded seaside
lands, is a time of hesitation, preparation, and violence. It is
waiting weather.
The tempo had changed--it was late in February I had felt it. The
winter fist began to unclench a little. Before another day of frost,
sleet, or wet snow, spring rain might bucket down in the evening,
or freak lightning might crack the sky. The days were gray and raw
more often than not, but when the sun shone it was sheer grace. One
night there were wands of light shuddering against great, shimmering,
flushed curtains on the sky wall over Cape Cod Bay--being the legendary
northern lights, grandly named aurora borealis. The following day was
cold, dull, and obdurate again.
Then when the temperature began to ease up occasionally from the
thirties to the forties, as March went on, a surprise snowstorm came
howling in. Poles snapped; wires broke, and the resulting power
failures lasted for several days, during which some people rediscovered
fate. The radio, before communication was entirely cut, sounded off
about the inexorable as cars and trains were stopped and men died after
shoveling snow. In that whole weather always cast beyond complaint or
prediction, this storm only represented a temporary arrest. Our primal
agent the sun still had the season’s growth in hand, more various than
fate; which is not to minimize the tragedies along the way. Some days
after the storm I found four or five male bluebirds in spring plumage
all huddled dead in the bottom of a birdhouse--a pathetic brilliance.
The entrance had probably been blocked by wet snow after they had taken
refuge there.
As the growing sunlight played a steady tune, so the alewives, perhaps
less affected by local storms than we, were due to come in, if only in
small numbers. Where were they? I stopped by the Herring Run where the
brook was full of loud cold water, but empty of fish. All the same,
Harry Alexander, the alewife warden, was there, giving a display of
public confidence. He had taken up his annual stance on Stony Brook
Road, which bridges the run, and with a truculent punch of his lips
against his pipestem, he made ready for the coming season.
In a world era, this is a local man. He has the cast and sense of place
about him and some of its accumulated age. I have seen it in other
men who have spent their lives in the same country environment. He is
heavy, ruddy, thickset--an old boat in a Cape port. During his tenure
on the alewives committee he seems to have developed a proprietary
attitude about the run which probably exceeds his authority, but very
few people object.
He certainly makes more of the job than the small wages he gets from
the town; and in years past the alewives have had a defender in him
at Town Meeting, when discussion came up about the amount of money
allotted to the Herring Brook. From a naturalist’s point of view, he
can hardly be said to have much sentiment in him about these fish as
part of the living community. Too many of them would stink the place
up, or so he affirms. I remember him at a hearing, speaking to a public
official in this wise, “Ever see my brook? Our brook, I mean. No dirty,
stinking mess up there!”
So, in his special way, he keeps the area clean, and is the herring’s
defender and interpreter. I think he likes to conceive of himself as
a kind of rascal. To those who ask him about the fish he is liable
to dispense information that is an outrage to the innocent. Two
Connecticut schoolteachers were once directed to the run, and came
away saying the alewives were often so plentiful that the Cape Codders
shingled their houses with them. (This is part of what he has called
“My fight with the public.”)
So, a “Cape Cod character,” personification of an old locality ... but
I don’t think he would like me to write too well of his character.
That day as I lingered at the run he gave me a lowering look. What was
I interested in the fish for? Well, if I’d take the information from
him, we could make ourselves a pile of money by selling the story to
_Collier’s_ magazine. Did I ever hear about the Indians
shooting these fish from the trees?
Facts, Harry. Facts.
“Well, naow, I’ll tell you. With the shore wind blowing on the long
flats out there and the water ruffling up like that, the fish don’t
come in much. But they’ll be along. Yes-yes.”
So was there nothing to do but take tentative steps and wait? The
scene, the place, the weather--an emergent weather in me perhaps--was
more compelling than that. The wind blowing, brook roaring, sun shafts
through the steely sky, all urged an opening. I walked down to the
south side of the road, by the tall lilacs, under high willows and
maple trees. Here the waters of the brook divide between the concrete
fishway and a side or “waste” stream which rejoins the other some fifty
feet farther on, dropping precipitously over rocks that foam with water
too high for the migrating fish to leap.
I walked down a path at the edge of this narrow waste stream. Where the
water was running swiftly, lithely, between the high rock foundations
of the road on one side and a low dirt bank with grass hummocks on the
other, I saw the brown head of a muskrat leading across the stream not
more than twenty feet away. The sleek, dark little animal swam over
to a stone across from me and sat there eating something with quick,
legerdemain little gestures, a fast shuttling between its paws and
its whiskered face. Apparently it couldn’t see me. The east wind was
blowing across us, and the fresh waters were roaring. Then it stopped
and nosed back into the stream, swimming across to a tussock not more
than twelve feet from where I stood. It plucked out, quickly, a sizable
bunch of grass and swam back with it to the same eating place and
chewed it up. Then it returned to the shallow water, swimming close
to the bottom, where I could plainly see it going easily against the
current with its two hind legs stretched out, propelling it, and the
long flat tail acting as a scull.
It emerged to disappear in a few rock crevices and then came out,
its glossy, questioning head sniffing for danger before it dropped
down again. Finally it swam out of sight into the cruel brilliance of
sun-reflecting waters that ran full out, full tilt. Pools of plenty
were continually releasing and boiling as if they were the strength and
source of all motion.
The muskrat’s eyes were black as rock recesses and its pelt as dark
and glistening as a mud bank. It was at home, with all its food around
it--grass, minnows, salamanders, fresh-water mussels--in an adaptation,
a closeness to the place, arrived at through both random and inevitable
forces. It knew its small world and needed no outside instruments to
set its course by. I might wonder about the next event, the coming
storms, but here was this animal swimming away as if it said, “Come on
in. The universal water’s fine.”--in a stream as yet too cold for me.
[Illustration]
II
Arrival
A week or so later, early in April, I finally saw my first alewife of
the season. It had the brook to itself where I caught sight of it--a
cloudy form running upcurrent--and when I went closer I could see it
probing the rippling, beating waters, with all that fish articulation
of separate fins together, fanning slightly, waving, threading, and
steering, the fixed eyes staring on, its whole body weaving with the
flow. It is a surprisingly large fish, seen for the first time in a
narrow stream. Its length may be anywhere between ten and thirteen
inches, and it has a heavy look for those who are used to sunfish and
minnows.
An alewife was no novelty to me, but this one seemed to decide the
year’s direction. It started things out. I saw it for the first time,
as child or genius does who finds some whole deep image in the air,
or radiant clarity in the water. I had the feeling too that I was
looking at a professional from an old water world, a new agent of old
assurance, deserving profound respect. After all, it had been coming
back here thousands of years before me, in the migrant history of its
race, and by this time must have mastered its passage. And as a natural
event, a part of the spring’s development, it seemed to announce that
bud scales on shrubs and trees would start to crack and fall away to
let the inner shoots out that unfold as leaves and feed on the sun. It
said that flies and wasps and spiders would come out of winter hiding
and sleeping, that the song sparrows would begin to sing in the willows
and viburnum bushes along the banks of Stony Brook.
There is something exciting and strange about the sudden appearance of
new life in the spring, coming from another region, another climate.
The terns or plovers that appear along the shore bring an unknown
experience with them. They seem to start in or to assemble according
to some tremendous demand which is in no way restricted to seasonal
lags. They recur; they are recognizable; and yet they bring in endless
tides and vivid journeys, being a part of that remarkable projection
of nature in which a multitude of lives use their skill in navigation,
their plumage, their scales, fins, and various senses, their particular
drives toward fulfillment.
Migration is universal. That which prompts animals to emerge from their
burrows, or to start moving over the ocean floor, to fly north, to
swim into brackish or fresh water from salt, or even, like a ladybird
beetle, to move a short distance from a forest floor to a meadow, must
have a world-wide energy to it, with lines of communication that
reach everywhere ahead and invite the human drive for knowledge. But
in a strict sense there are two accepted definitions of migration for
the animals. There is return migration, of which the alewives provide
an example. Fish or birds in this category travel seasonally from one
area to another, usually coming back to some home region after varying
lapses of time. Otherwise, there is emigration, in which animals leave
their home base but never come back again, lemmings and locusts being
good examples. Both definitions, I should think, can prove that home
stretches farther than we know.
Why had this pioneer of an alewife, and the others that had come
before it, arrived so soon? It is possible that they had migrated up
Stony Brook before. All mature alewives--a majority seem to be four
years old--are moved by sexual development and swim inshore when the
temperature of the fresh or brackish water has turned warmer than the
salt water from whence they came. The earliest comers often appear to
be larger in size. This suggests, at least, that they may be older and
that they have spawned in that run before. The latest to come seem to
be the smallest, and therefore the youngest. Alewives, like other fish,
seem to have a tendency to keep growing, though there may be a maximum
size reached in their fifth or sixth year. The only conclusive way to
tell their age is by microscopic examination of their scales, which
reflect each spawning year and its physical changes.
Work done by Keith Havey on alewives in Maine shows a minimum of
alewives spawning at three years of age and the largest number in the
four- or five-year-old range. No scales were found which reflected more
than two spawnings. As to size, he gives a sampling of their length in
inches which graduates up from 11.25 inches in the three-year-old fish
to 11.80 in the four-year-olds, 12.35 in five-year-olds, and 12.80 in
the six. The female alewife, incidentally, is a little larger than the
male.
Possibly then, these early alewives at Stony Brook were the oldest,
and because of that they might have been the most practiced at finding
their way. I am told that, with new fish ladders, observers have
noticed the earliest arrivals seeking and passing through them more
readily on the second year after construction than on the first, which
leads to the belief that they have been through before. Age may improve
the alewife in prowess, though it is a fish of crowds, and not one to
strike out much on its own. The “homing instinct,” still unfathomed,
but about which I will try to say more later on, brings them back to
their streams of origin with almost united force.
[Illustration]
So my lone alewife marked the greatness it preceded, though it was
early, in early and still undecided weather. At first the sleet,
hail, flurries of wet snow came in profusion, stabbing between the
sunshine, as though nature, before making its next terms known, was
full of passionate unease. Then wings of warm rain would beat in over
the Cape, to slash and curve and follow along trees and houses, through
inland ponds, across the ridges and hollows, and the wind poured behind
in great gusts, trying, it seemed, to shake a tight world loose.
Underneath the struggling air many things waited for more chances in
the sun, but under the stars, on foggy evenings or bright days, the
singing of peepers in pools, ponds, or boggy land would swell and widen
everywhere.
Then as the month kept advancing, that which came out began to stay,
and to expand, in variety, flexibility, and strength. The wheels of
the world seemed to turn more brightly. I felt a suggestion in each
changing tree, in the loosening ground, the kinetic light and air, of
new unfoldings, kaleidoscopic discoveries. The formality, and power in
the coming on of spring surprised me, as if it had never come before.
More winds began to blow from the southwest, the prevailing wind during
late spring and summer. Yellow fingertips of bloom showed on the
whip-long branches of the forsythias. The temperature edged toward the
fifties, and there were deep new meetings between the moles and the
worms. One day many tree swallows began to flit and dive low around
the Herring Run. They skimmed along the surface of the water, then
sailed up again. Their bellies were as white as a frog’s or horned
pout’s, dark wings and tails trimly cut, backs almost a tropical blue
in the light above the water, reflecting green at some angles, or a
green-blue-purple the color of mackerel. Their flight dipped with the
up and down flying insects they were chasing. When some insect, unseen
to me, spiraled straight up along the banks, a swallow would leave its
water gliding, twist suddenly, beating its wings, and almost spiral
after.
That original source of energy the sun, which men might still worship
in good faith, was bringing out new facets to shine abroad. The web of
life was stretching to its light. Birds, insects, plants, and fish were
beginning to move to its changing measure; though if some days were
warm with a budding, fringing, easing expectation, others were still
raw, wet, and contracting, bringing winter back to flesh and fiber. We
kept looking for the alewives. Cars would slow up at the Herring Run.
The drivers peered down to see the curving, dark forms of a few fish
holding up against the current. Then they drove on. Or they got out,
saw nothing, and went away in disappointment. But suddenly one morning
toward the middle of April the crowd of alewives had so increased as to
cause an inescapable excitement in the vicinity. The water was thick
with fish, their fins showing on the surface. It was almost as it had
been a hundred years before when the whole population would cry out at
their coming, “The herring are running!”
III
Dried Fish:
An Informal History
“The herring are running!” must have been a great cry once, for men,
women, and children over the whole Cape. There was a deep meaning in
this seasonal event, since the fish were a part of the local livelihood
the year around. Nowadays, so far as commerce is concerned, the
alewives lack their former importance. In Massachusetts, although they
come into a number of streams and rivers few alewives are taken for the
market. I understand that in recent years only the runs at Brewster and
Middleboro have been open for commercial use, the fishing rights having
been sold to the highest bidder.
For all that, it still seems a live, high, and social morning when
you wake to the gabbling of gulls in the distance and know that the
alewives have finally arrived. The sun spreads down new warmth. There
are cool sweeps of breeze, broad runs of blue in sky and sea past the
gray and white houses, with those silver hordes starting to enter
inland veins in a bold reminder of perpetuity.
This season the rights to fish the stream had been bought from the
town by a firm that wanted them for lobster bait. On the eighteenth
day of the month a big red truck had pulled alongside the seining pool
and the old mill. Three men were down in the pool, with their rubber
boots on, putting a wide net in place. It was rimmed with cork floats
and roped at the center to a hoist fixed to a small dock on the bank. A
little wire gate was closed at the stream entrance on the upper side of
the pool, so that the fish could go no farther. The run was officially
on; and until it thinned out two months ahead, the fish would be hauled
from the pool four days a week, thrown into barrels, and trucked away
to be sold as lobster bait.
A sign was posted at Stony Brook, reading: “No herring may be taken
or molested in Stony Brook on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays in
accordance with state law. Residents of Brewster are entitled without
charge to one dozen herring daily on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays,
and Thursdays during the open season, and should obtain them from J.
B. Salvadore, Jr., who has purchased the Herring Fishery Rights for
this year, or may take them from the brook on these days if he is not
present.” It was signed by the selectmen of the town of Brewster.
On the down side of the road a bunch of children were celebrating the
coming of the fish. The alewives, crowding, resting, circling, and
slipping up through the pools and falls of the fishway--their bodies a
fretted-lavender brown in the bubbling waters--were now fair game for
the inland world they had come back to. Three boys were competing for
a crab net they were dipping into the water, scooping after the fish,
and as often as not heaving it up empty. One of them was professionally
pinching the belly sides of a fat, gleaming alewife to see if it was
a female and would emit some of its roe. Then he flung it back into
the water with furious energy; and it slapped hard when it hit, and he
cheered.
Were they under the law, these predators? Well, this play, or hunt,
this spring jubilation had been going on for several hundred years.
“Let the kids play around there, I say,” said Herring Harry. “We were
kids too. We didn’t start out old.”
In barer, colder, perhaps simpler days, days when men lived closer to
their natural surroundings and were more dependent on them than they
think they are now, the alewives meant food and revenue, an abundance
returning to your own back yard. They came under the heading of useful
acquaintances. But now the roe, or fish eggs, is the only part of the
alewife that is highly considered locally. It is a very bony fish
and most people reject the idea of eating it, forgetting the days of
“good salt herring” when the children ate them on sticks like candy.
So the Brewster resident gets his allotment for the roe, to be fried
in butter. An ambitious gardener can bury the rest under his corn
plantings to serve as fertilizer, if the cats permit, though it is
still a very good way to make corn grow tall in unreceptive soil. A
hundred years ago or more, when it was done extensively, it resulted
in rich yields. I have heard that one acre set with a thousand fish
would produce three times as much corn as an acre without them. It
is a practice that we inherit from the Indians, although the Indian
agriculturist was likely to be plagued by wolves instead of cats.
Cape Codders, even so comparatively short a time ago as fifty or sixty
years, would not have liked to hear this farming method belittled.
Some of them may even have regarded it with delight. I recently talked
with a man who was a boy in the 1890’s and remembers walking behind a
wagonload of “very dead” fish in a field made ready for corn. A man in
the wagon pitched out a forkful of herring into each prepared hole as
they creaked along, while another, walking behind, shoved dirt over
them and planted the seed. He can remember a relative cocking a keen
ear one night and saying, “Listen! You can hear it growing. By God,
when their feet hit that stinking mess don’t they start up and go!”
Although to know them may have been to understand their worth, I find
one early writer, Marshall McDonald Douglass, in his _North
America_, 1740, who does not give the tribe much credit.
“Alewives,” he says, “by some of the country people are called
Herrings. They are of the Herring tribe but much larger than the true
Herring. They are a very mean, dry and insipid fish. Some of them are
cured in the manner of white Herrings and sent to the sugar islands for
the slaves, but because of their bad quality they are not in request:
in some places they are used to manure the land. They are very plenty,
and come up the rivers and brooks into ponds in the spring.” None the
less, they used to be smoked or pickled in brine and shipped out in
barrels to the West Indies, and whether or not the quality was bad the
demand was enough to make the trade in them into one of great volume,
part in fact of the famous swap for molasses, later turned into New
England rum, which was so important in our early history.
Before I try to defend these fish against any further imputations, I
should explain their name. “Herrin’” is the name and pronunciation on
Cape Cod. I don’t call them alewives just to defy such Cape Codders
as might be fussy about it, but to differentiate them from their more
famous cousins the sea herring, which spawn in salt water. Cape Cod
has its alewives committees, and it may be that the fish were called
alewives here before they were called herrin’.
You can still read statements to the effect that the original name
“alewife” is a corruption of the Indian word “aloofe,” which meant bony
fish. In 1871 a gentleman named J. Hammond Trumbull tried to scotch
this bit of etymology by pointing out--in a government publication
on Sea Fisheries, that the Narragansett and Massachusetts Indians
called the alewife and herring “Aumsu-og,” as had been noted by Roger
Williams. In any case, whichever Indianism we choose, it seems more
likely that the name stemmed from English dialect. “Allizes,” not at
all like aloofe, was one of the names applied to it in company with the
allice shad. To quote Mr. Trumbull again: “The modern English ‘allis’
was in old French and old English ‘alouze’ or ‘aloose,’ nearer than
the modern form of the name to the Latin ‘alausa.’” The latest in this
chain of spellings is of course _Alosa_, the scientific handle now
applied to the shad, and in some texts to the alewife.
To the English colonists an alewife was also an alehouse keeper.
_A Dictionary of Americanisms_ quotes a volume printed in
1675 which said: “The alewife is like a herrin’, but it has a bigger
bellie, therefore called an alewife.” (Let that quotation be of some
comfort to the proponents of herrin’. The name has a formal heritage.)
The writer was surely not making a direct physical analogy between a
woman and a fish. The original alewife he probably has reference to
is a shad, but _Pomolobus pseudoharengus_ does have a deep body
and is heavily built forward, so perhaps a comparison with a hearty
alewife of sixteenth- or seventeenth-century England would not be too
far-fetched.
The poet Skelton described an alewife, Eleanor Rummying by name, who
lived in the time of Henry VIII. She brewed a “hoppy ale,” and “her
face was wondrously wrinkled, lyke a rost pigges eare bristled with
here”--at which point I will let the analogy go on its merry way.
The alewife has had a variety of local and common names, the kind that
indicate touch and sight, the handing on of natural meetings--the
signposts of its contacts with man and his history on the eastern
shores of this continent. It is known as “sawbelly,” for example,
referring to the fine sharp little notches or teeth on the midline
of its belly; and for the large eyes, set on each side of its small
head, it has been called “wall-eyed herring,” “big-eyed herring,”
or “blear-eyed herring.” It is also the “spring herring,” “branch
herring,” “river herring,” or “fresh-water herring.”
This old New England name of alewife has its modifications in “Ellwife”
and “Ellwhop” on the Connecticut River, and there were variant
pronunciations in other regions. In the state of Rhode Island alewives
were called “buckies” and in Maine “cat-thrashers.” In Canada the name
is “Gaspereau,” sometimes “Gasparot.” The term “alewife” is uncommon
in the maritime provinces. There seem to be three Gaspereau Rivers,
two in New Brunswick and one in Nova Scotia, in addition to a town of
that name in New Brunswick, and a lake in Nova Scotia. Apparently the
place name derives from the fish, and not the other way around. In its
15th Report, for 1917, the Geographic Board of Canada says “after a
fish,” in explaining the name of the Gaspereau River. Another Canadian
term for alewife is “kyak” or “kyack,” which sounds like a derivation
from northern Indians. Mr. A. H. Leim of the Biological Station at St.
Andrews, New Brunswick, writes me that he has only heard “one or two
fishermen call them ‘kyacks’; one of these was an old poacher on the
Shubenacadie River in Nova Scotia who always used this name. I assume
the word is of Indian origin.”
Finally the alewife is called “grayback,” a name that distinguishes
it from a close relative often confused with it, which is called
the “blackback,” “blueback,” or “glut herring” (_Pomolobus
aestivalis_). The blueback shows up in a late spring run, and seems
to spawn in the lower reaches of a stream, instead of migrating up to
its headwaters. It has smaller eyes than the “grayback” and as its
name indicates its back is dark blue, instead of greenish gray, but as
colors fade at death, this is no sure test. The two species of alewife
can only be told apart conclusively by dissection. The lining of the
blueback’s body cavity is black instead of pink or gray.
These names are also indicative of the range of the alewife, all the
way from the Gulf of St. Lawrence to the Carolinas. In the spawning
season they come inland by way of sandy inlets, great tidal bays,
fresh-water river mouths, or creeks only a few yards wide. Most of
the streams by which they are still able to swim up have their local
history of fishing alewives, either with traps, weirs, dip nets, or
even pails. In the fisheries of Maine it is known as “alewife dipping.”
This is an important “food fish,” even though it may never have
approached the sea herring in numbers, nor been as famous as the cod.
If the English sailor, Captain Bartholomew Gosnold, had been ashore in
the springtime instead of on his ship when he gave the Cape its name,
it might now be called Cape Alewife.
Though they are only part of a multitude of other lives that nurtured
the American past, the alewives should be given high and special
credit. William Bradford’s _Of Plymouth Plantation_
testifies to their vital importance in the Pilgrims’ first year. After
the _Mayflower_ left in early April of 1621, Squanto, that greatly
helpful Indian, showed them “that in the middle of April they should
have store enough come up the brook by which they began to build,
and taught them how to take it, and where to get other provisions
necessary for them.” This brook ran, as it still runs, through the
town, so that the Plymouth inhabitants were lucky to have their supply
of alewives close at hand--they seemed to have depended on them
primarily for plantings, also taught them by Squanto. The fish came
in “fat and fair” and amazingly plentiful after a lean winter full of
apprehension. At first apparently each inhabitant took freely of the
fish in the brook, but this seems to have resulted in “injuring the
property of those near the place of taking.” As a result the Town
Brook became town responsibility after a few years, and the fishing was
regulated. The cost of a weir was distributed among the inhabitants
and the fishing put under the charge of town officers, with fines set
for taking alewives without permission. Innumerable fish laws were
passed after that, from the Colony of Plymouth to the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts. The fish ran comparatively free for a while, but through
the progression of these laws you might watch, in town after town, the
gradual growth of human population plus human concern for a valuable
product. In 1709 a general law provides: “That no wears, hedges,
fishgarths, stakes, kiddles, or other disturbance or encumbrance shall
be set, erected or made, on or across any river, to the stopping,
obstructing, or straitning of the natural or usual course and passage
of the fish in their seasons, or spring of the year, without the
approbation and allowance first had and obtained from the general
sessions of the peace in the same county....” An Act of 1741, to
“prevent the destruction of the fish called alewives, and other fish,”
might indicate that the colonists were beginning to notice a decline
in their numbers and to be apprehensive about it, although it is hard
to judge. _A History of Barnstable County_, published in
1890, has this to say: “Early in the last century the supply of herring
so far exceeded the demand for fish food that the surplus was used to
fertilize the fields, and the growing custom of using them in each
hill of planted corn was checked in 1718, the town fathers [of Bourne]
ordering that none should be taken in the future to ‘fish corn.’”
Apparently the alewife population did start to decrease a long time
ago. Fishermen along the Merrimack River noticed a diminishing in
numbers as early as the mid-eighteenth century; and somewhat later they
thought it might be due to the number of small ponds which had been
dammed up. These ponds had access to the river and so provided spawning
grounds. Certainly the alewives, through man’s agency, began to suffer
great setbacks in the old use of their runs. Some of the first culprits
were the woolen mills, and corn or grist mills such as the one at
Brewster--they blocked up many of the runs, in spite of the fish laws.
Then a tremendous industrial expansion put cities and factories along
all big rivers and many large streams, adding more mill dams across
the runs. The resulting sewage and manufacturing wastes polluted the
waters, destroying many fish, and making some rivers completely unfit
for migration. Extensive deforestation also resulted in the drying up
of a number of streams and the lowering of water levels. The nineteenth
century was a notorious plunderer.
Alewives in any large number now coincide with undeveloped areas, which
happen to be comparatively few along the Atlantic coast. As a result
of industrialization the original heavy runs were so reduced that
the only important, commercial runs are now in the southern part of
the alewife range, notably the Chesapeake, or north of Rhode Island.
Although the fish still have much less access to their ancient, natural
routes, the existing runs are probably less carelessly protected by
law. State laws put the responsibility of keeping the fishways clear
on the localities through which they run, but the state supervises
their condition, and if a run is too depleted the state can forbid the
sale of its fishing rights. Whatever may be said about their decline
in the long run, it is quite likely that state supervision has helped
to increase the alewife population during comparatively recent years.
It certainly seems to be true that the number of fish at the Brewster
run has increased since the fish ladders were built in 1945. The new
fishways made the rocky, often clogged stream easier of access, and
cut down on fish mortality as they ascended. They can, in other words,
be brought back; although there are fishermen in Maine who estimate
that the alewife population is only a third as large as it was some
fifty years ago, and there are those who say the decline has been even
greater in Massachusetts.
A great many of the old alewife fisheries lost their vitality because
there was no longer any local dependence on them nor any general
call for the product. A recent article in the _Maine Coast
Fishermen_ said this: “A few weeks ago in Wareham, Mass., the
local selectmen refused to auction off the fishing rights, feeling
the bids were too low. An old timer of the town, who has watched these
migrations since he was a boy, recalled that the alewife rights to the
stream in question once brought as much as $12,000 a year.” In the
smaller run at Brewster, incidentally, the bid taken during the last
spawning season was $450.
Control is still local. Where there are still good-sized runs, the
towns appoint alewives committees, whose members are re-elected
annually at Town Meeting. In Brewster, on a salary of some twenty-five
dollars a year, plus small wages for time spent, it is their job to
keep the Herring Run area neat; to post regulations; see that no
individual gets away with more than his allotted portion of fish; and
keep the stream free from obstruction so that the fish can proceed to
their spawning grounds, as well as into the nets of the concessionaire.
The town sells annual rights for the privilege of fishing the stream in
season, four days a week. On the other days the alewives are allowed to
go ahead and propagate their kind. The five hundred barrels or more of
fish that have been taken yearly from Stony Brook happen to have been
used recently for lobster bait.
To some extent, incidentally, their use and commercial value depends on
their condition and flavor. An alewife’s flesh is best when it has been
taken directly out of salt water. The ocean flavor is progressively
lost as the fish migrates through inland streams. So they have their
highest value where the runs are located close to the sea, or tidal
rivers such as the one at Damariscotta, Maine.
The West Indies trade is over, as well as the days of “good salt
herring.” The most likely place to see indications of alewife now is
on the stupendously bountiful shelves of a chain store, in the form of
a can with a picture of a cat on it. And the future of the alewife, in
human hands at least, seems to depend on a wider demand for it. It is
valued neither for sport nor edibility, but is used for cat and dog
food, fish meal, and pickled fish, with some, as at Brewster, being
taken for lobster bait. Apparently there is an innate prejudice among
some New Englanders against using a traditional food fish for other
purposes, and a belief that selling it for meal or cat food is less
profitable. Put this down to thrift, or respect for old ways, still it
stands against the fact that the alewife’s latest value comes from its
status as a processed, rather than edible, food. “Reduction” is what
they call it when the alewives are turned into fish meal, and in a
sense perhaps they have been reduced, at least in our personal esteem.
They now belong to a technical age with the rest of us.
With modern methods of handling, packing, and transportation the old
fisheries may have been left behind, but it should be said that,
because of its new status in commerce, ignominious or not, the alewife
may stand a better chance. The State of Maine, for example, has been
undertaking thorough study of the alewives in order to find out how old
runs can be brought back, or new ones created. They are a fish that
are very responsive to management. When barriers are removed and open
fishways are made, they take their opportunity.
All is not well with the traditional ways, though the alewives may be
perfectly ready to go beyond them. In the old days on Cape Cod there
was hardly a seafaring man who did not take his salt herring aboard
with him, and on land, after being salted, dried in the sun, and
smoked, they were strung on sticks and sold for ten cents a stick.
There were many smokehouses on the Cape, and in the wintertime dried
fish hung on the barn rafters above the haylofts. I have a comment on
those days from Mr. Alexander: “None of your First National Stores
then,” said he. “We lived off the earth ... potatoes and smoked
herrin’. That’s why some of us old goats lived so long.”
It is hard to find smoked herring these days. It is a skill that seems
to have almost gone; and I am told that there used to be a good deal of
variation in the product. Smoked fish are now easier to find in Maine
than on Cape Cod. I bought a pair recently in a small general store
in Maine at the excessive price of fifteen cents. A dried alewife was
handsomer than I had suspected, and the smell not unpleasant, although
I might not say as much for a barnful. The head and eye sockets were
encrusted with salt, and the hard thin body was colored a bronze and
smoky gold as though heat still roamed the scales. I was reminded for
some reason of a metal bowl I had once seen that came from the land of
the Incas. I peeled off the scales and chawed a toast to our ancestors.
IV
The Reproductive Urge
The fishing operation near the old grist mill was in full swing after
the twenty-third of April. The _Salvadore_ crew was hauling in
their net with the aid of a winch. It was loaded with fish, enough to
fill four or five barrels. The victims were flipping and flashing with
a whirring violence, a high sound going up in the gray morning air, a
beautiful iridescence in their white-silver sides. The whole dripping
net was heavy and alive with their shivering, thrashing, and dying.
Heads butted through the mesh and gills caught, in their frantic,
vibrating despair ... and all for lobster bait, worth six dollars a
barrel.
The early colonists spoke of alewives coming up their streams in
“incredible” numbers, and so it still looks, though Stony Brook, for
one, is narrow in its upper reaches, and when the fish are forced into
it they are crowded beyond all proportion. The inland stream, with
its fresh-water grasses, insects, and small fish is suddenly host to
a large and almost foreign form of life, except that they are both
closely joined to the sea.
On the whole, it had been a rainy month. The brook below the seining
pool was roaring and foaming down. Such was the teeming crowd of
alewives trying to swim up through the ladder, through the violently
heavy flow, that there was a constant falling back, a silver slapping
and flapping over the concrete rims of the pools. Farther down, where
the waste stream tumbled over a small mountain of rocks, too high for
the fish to jump (their limit, on a vertical leap, seems to be not much
over two feet), there was a scene to force the heart. Always a certain
number of fish, dividing from those that swam the main stream toward
the ladder, would attempt the impossible at this place. Ordinarily,
when an alewife meets obstacles in its advance upcurrent it will
quickly go forward into it, then leap in short dashes over rocks and
the lip of fishways. I had seen them go up without apparent rest where
the stream falls down the inclined ladder at the pond outlet above.
They were dancing and flipping up those waters, which were rushing and
bubbling down, like kites in a fast wind.
Yet here, for all their instinctive valiance, was the unsurmountable.
Now, as they had done for thousands of years, they tried and failed.
White tons of water smashed down over the rocks, but time and time
again one fish after another made a quick dash into it and almost flew,
hanging with vibrant velocity in the torrent until it was flung back.
Many were exhausted and found their way back to the main stream,
circling and swimming slowly, and a large number were smashed against
the rocks to turn belly up and die, eaten later by young eels, or
gulls and herons, as they were taken downstream by the current. Some
were wedged in the rocks and could be seen there for days as the water
gradually tore them apart until they were nothing but white shreds of
skin.
A wooden bridge crosses over Stony Brook at this point. A neighbor of
mine, a mother of children, was standing there watching when I came up,
and I heard her say, “Terrible!” I guessed that she knew what she saw,
besides death and defeat. It was the drive to be, a common and terrible
sending out, to which men are also bound in helplessness.
We are astonished by this fantastic drive. “What is the point? What
makes them take these suicidal chances? Why?” It is as if we were
trying to get back, or down, to an explanation in ourselves that we had
lost sight of. But somewhere in us, through this feverish, undecided
world, we still know.
Are they stupid? There is no measure in the world of nature more
excellent than a fish. It may be comparatively low in the evolutionary
scale of complexity, but no animal is more finely made, or better
suited to its own medium. All the same, the unvaried blindness their
action seemed to show would sometimes strike me as hard as did their
ability in the water.
Stony Brook was black with them. There was no open patch of stream bed
to be seen. And with the excessive crowding, the general procession,
so steadily insistent on its own time, was hurried up to some extent.
Their motion became almost ponderous and tense, while individual fish
leaped like dolphins, pewter- and gold-sided, over and through the dark
herd. Others circled in and out or kept pace with the rest, staring
ahead.
They had a synchronized momentum of their own. If I dropped a stone in
the middle of them, they would separate at that point and then close in
to fill the gap. There could be no nullifying or breaking their united
persistence. Their onwardness, their desperate dashing against the
rocks, had its own logic--a logic which had nothing to do with hope,
reason, or choosing another alternative. No way out, in other words.
Slavery to the reproductive urge. These alewives are more dumb than
sheep. If you were to press your own sympathy hard enough, you might
feel a terrible lack of variety in them, or, paradoxically enough, of
daring. The lidless-eyed and plunging multitude seems brutally driven,
without a chance. This is “togetherness” with a terrible vengeance.
Perhaps there is something here that we know too, as fellow animals,
and lose sight of. At the risk of making one of those vaguely
anthropomorphic assumptions against which the objective scientists are
constantly warning us, I would guess that the self-motivation in this
onward mass of fish might be compared to those human crowds that take
action under stress, independently of the individuals that make them
up. Suddenly a crowd, hitherto a random combination of people, takes
on a frightening rhythm and purpose of its own. It is governed by
laws which go back infinitely farther in the history of life than the
immediate goal of its anger or exultation.
I have explained nothing. I can only say that when I first saw these
fish I was moved in spite of myself. Instinct is no more blind than
wonder. To have the human attributes of mind and spirit and the race’s
ability to control its own environment does not give me the wit to beat
the infinitely various will of life at its own game. All I could wish
for would be to join it.
I walked on down the banks of Stony Brook, past the Herring Run area
with its neat paths, bridges, and fish ladders, my shoes squashing in
the mud. The stream turns a slight angle at this point, gets broader
and shallower and begins to run through the little valley that ends
in tidal marshes and the Bay. The alewives, for a hundred yards at
least, were running up against the downward currents, massed almost
stationary, not in ranks, but ordered mutuality, with a long waving
like water grasses or kelp, and curving, twisting, swirling like their
medium the water as they moved very gradually ahead. There was no
indiscriminate rushing ahead. It was done to measure; but it seemed
to me that through their unalterable persistence I saw the heaving
of crowds of all kinds, of buffalo, cattle, sheep, or men. I had seen
as much motion in crowds pouring out of a subway entrance or massing
through a square. History was in their coming on, without its shouts
and cheers. They could not speak for themselves; but who knew how deep
the silence went?
Ahead of them there was a net; behind, down the broader reaches of
the brook, the greedy herring gulls dropped down into the water after
them, or stood along the bank in apparently glutted satisfaction, while
others screamed and sailed overhead. In spite of their slow gliders’
grace and local lethargy compared with swift sea birds like the terns,
gulls travel the rims of the world. They had always made me think of
far-distance, voyages unending. Many of them had congregated on a bald
hill that overlooks the run and were standing like white sentries under
the shafts of the northern sky beyond. From far off they sometimes
suggest rows of military crosses, and I have heard them compared to a
field of flowers. Soldiers, flowers, graves ... all these they might
suggest on the heights of fate, by their pure bold greed and unmatched
design. They stood on a wide stage.
V
The Nature of an Alewife
The fish kept moving up. I watched them swinging back and forth with
the current, great-eyed, sinewy, probing, weaving, their dorsal fins
cutting the surface, their ventral fins fanning, their tails flipping
and sculling. In the thick, interbalanced crowd there would suddenly
be a scattered dashing, coming as quickly as cat’s-paws flicking the
summer seas. They may have moved by “reflex” rather than conscious
thought, but what marvelous professionals they were in that!
The cold raw winds of April had heeled back, and May swung on. There
were an increasing number of days with the wind from the southwest,
smelling of sunny springtime. The local paper had it that the
temperature averaged a high of 66.6 degrees Fahrenheit and a low of
44.2 in the week between the second and the ninth of May. The following
week the average rose a little, going to between 67.5 and 47 degrees.
The first reported striped bass, a three-and-a-half-pounder, was caught
on the Cape the eighth of the month.
The willows that hung over the Herring Run were budding and flowering
out, lacing and fringing with many beads, a yellow-green; and leaves of
the red maples began to unfold, a light coppery russet color, hanging
like limp claws--and elsewhere, on higher ridges and other roads, the
oaks in their leafy variety of pink, yellow, gray and pale green, were
starting their fires with tenderness. Clouds of the shad-blow’s lacy
white blossoms came out everywhere between pitch pines and oaks, to
last only a few days and be replaced by beach plums whose flowers burst
out of their sheaths like popping corn.
The procession, down the brook and around its bend, made other rushing
sounds above the noise of the flow itself. The gulls in the valley were
crying out with “ho!” and “ha!” and “yi!” The shadow of a gull flying
high over us fell across the water and the alewives rushed to the side.
The backs of some of them were cruelly gashed. There was a dead one on
the bank, stiff and dry, flatly reflecting the blue in the sky like an
unpolished knife blade.
[Illustration]
They were close-packed going up through the ladders, herding, slipping,
slanting, struggling in relation to each other. I grabbed one out with
my hands. It shuddered, was almost still for a second or two, like a
man with his wind knocked out, then plunged in my hands and slipped
out onto the bank. It thrashed there in the grass, a twelve-inch fish,
with a gray-green back, and silver sides and belly that reflected the
magnificent surfaces of May, with grass, sun, and blue sky intruding
through the overhanging leaves and the brown earth. It shone with
violet, yellow-green, white and brown, pink and blue. It had an
inclusive majesty, a great natural art.
Its silver scales are large, like iridescent reflecting coins: and in
the water the alewife is able to alter the pigmentation of its skin so
as to blend with the background. It is able to do this very quickly, so
that it changes in color as it moves up the stream to correspond with
a darker or lighter bottom ... part of the whole various pattern of
adaptation which the fish show to the water around them.
During the course of evolution brain development among the fishes has
been slow. What brain power they have is closely related to their sense
organs, concentrated on their whole bodily co-ordination; in which,
so far as water action is concerned, they are man’s superiors. An
alewife’s body is marvelously fitted to situation--peace or turbulence,
light or dark, flood and ebb, ripple or rile. This inhabitant of the
sea weaves up through the overhanging springtime, and seems a part of
it, experienced as to its flowering.
For it is a salt-water fish, as I sometimes had to remind myself
later between the ponds and the Bay, although there is a landlocked
variety; and as such it is part of a prodigious tribe. As a member of
the herring family--the Clupeidae, it is related to the sea herring,
sprats, shads, pilchards, and menhadens. The sea herring is one of
the most important food fish in the world. In Europe whole societies
were affected by its shifts in abundance. Loss of control over herring
fisheries was instrumental in the breakup of the Hanseatic League.
In 1881 Thomas Henry Huxley said: “Man, in fact, is but one of a
vast co-operative society of herring catchers.” The yearly catch is
enormous. One school of herring may run not into millions but billions
of individual fish; though Huxley may have exaggerated the capacity of
the herring population to keep its level in the face of human demands.
To mention another important relative of the alewife, the common or
American shad is also a food fish, being something of a delicacy,
prized highly for its flesh and roe. It is a larger fish, weighing
between six and nine pounds; but it is not so abundant as the alewife.
The menhaden fishery is the largest in the country in terms of weight.
Some 800,000,000 pounds of this fish are harvested annually from the
Atlantic and Gulf coasts; its present fate is to be turned into fish
meal, scrap, and oil. In addition many tons of ground-up menhaden, or
“pogies,” are used by salt-water anglers to attract bluefish, tuna, or
mackerel.
All these herring species are similar in appearance, with silvery
scales, easily rubbed off, thin, deep bodies, and tails quite deeply
forked.
The alewife belongs to a group of great age in the earth’s history,
and one which has survived, for one thing, by reason of its numbers,
and not by any skill in speed or individual pugnacity. It depends on
the crowd rhythm for perpetuation. Its salt-water whereabouts are
comparatively unknown, although it is thought it may not go very far
afield; but in a run of alewives you might sense not numbers only,
but something of the sea’s capacious demands that made these fish to
measure. Green, gray, silver, they wear its colors, and seem built to
nose into its space, or be carried with its moods.
Are there no individuals among them? It is perhaps no term to apply
with so manifestly united a company. In any case we are deceived if we
try to translate ourselves, our ability to choose, our eyes for pattern
and variation, into an animal that can see us at best as an occasional,
strange, blurred image appearing above the bank, and to whom everything
but the water world is unknown. In a sense we know too little, and so
do they, to discuss the matter.
Yet anyone, with a slipping, plunging alewife in his hands, knows it in
some degree for its uniqueness. This green-backed, silver-sided water
animal, smooth, supple, and muscular, with a sail-like fin on its back
is definite enough. Its body is convex-sided, coming to a thin edge
at the belly, shaped like shellfish, seeds, or Indian artifacts. From
its undershot jaw to its tail, it is clearly a tough fish, and in our
experience an adaptable one that knows its way.
This is the “sawbelly” all right. You can very easily feel the
serrations, or little teeth, with your fingers--it is one good way of
telling alewives from sea herring in the dark. But the name “big-eyed”
is perhaps most dramatically true of the alewife. Its black, round,
shining eyes are very prominent in proportion to its small head and
small mouth. They are large black disks like certain water-worn rocks,
or they are great bubbles coming up from a dark depth. I fancied,
seeing a tiny image of myself in the alewife’s eye, that I was
reflected in a deep, impenetrable well.
It is known that a fish’s eye is somewhat like ours in that it has
a lens, an iris, a cornea, retina, and optic nerve; but that it is
designed to see under water, which ours is not. In J. H. Norman’s
_History of Fishes_, he writes: “The eye, as is well known,
acts after the manner of a photographic camera, the two essential parts
being the screen or retina at the back, and the lens at the front,
which projects an image of the outside world on the screen. The lens
of a land vertebrate is somewhat flat and convex on both sides, but in
the fish it is a globular body, the extreme convexity being a necessity
under water because the substance of the lens is not very much denser
than the fluid medium in which the fish lives. The space between lens
and retina is filled with a transparent jelly-like substance, the
vitreous humor. The transparent outer wall of the eye, the cornea, is
somewhat flatter in fishes, and the space between this and the lens
is filled by the watery, aqueous humor. In land vertebrates the iris
of the eye is capable of great contraction, and, acting like the
diaphragm of a camera, regulates the amount of light allowed to enter
the eye. In fishes it generally surrounds a rounded pupil, and has
comparatively little power of contraction.”
I should add that an alewife’s eye is somewhat fixed, and not capable
of much movement.
Back of the eyes and mouth are the gill covers that protect the gills
underneath, which are weak and blood-filled, dark-red overlapping
layers, like petals, four on each side. As the fish’s gill covers open
and close, water passes over the gills, taking oxygen into the blood
stream. The alewife’s heart, which pumps blood to the gills, is located
directly below them.
This is a plankton eater, although it will eat shrimp, small fish,
or young eels, on occasion. It has no teeth, or such a semblance of
tiny, weak ones, back in its mouth, that they are of little use. The
particles of food that come through its mouth are strained through a
device known as gill rakers, which act as sieves or filters, in the
form of fine hairlike growths mounted on the gill arches, the bony
structures on which the gills are also arranged.
A female alewife can be recognized fairly readily by its size. On the
average the males run from ten to eleven inches and the females from
eleven to twelve, and the males are of course lighter. The proportion
of males to females on the inland run seems to be about fifty-fifty.
Alewives weigh anywhere between eight and ten ounces. Part of the
weight of both sexes during their spawning migration is accounted for
by the roe; in fact, their ovaries and testes may become so enlarged
as to fill up a large part of their bodies. The egg sacs of the female
vary in color from pink to yellow or yellow-orange, depending on their
stage of development. The milt, sometimes called soft roe, of the male,
is white and pink.
To sketch a fish so generally is scarcely to know it, but even if I
were able to give a good account of its complex skeleton down to the
last bone, or discuss all the actions of its nervous system as known
so far, I would not have done enough. Our bodies may have chemicals in
common with them, but we will never know the fish.
The alewife I took from the water eluded me. Cold-blooded fish,
warm-blooded man, the water’s triumph caught by the alien air. It
slipped my hand and knowledge. “An aquatic vertebrate?” A mystery,
though I recognized a life that shone with vibrant persistence, one of
nature’s particularized energies, a wild texture as old as the animal
world, a food that was the beneficent matter of all struggle and greed.
Were there more connections between us that needed exploration? How
much fright, how much nerve-threaded darkness, how much throbbing
electric quickness might not be receiving me in the distance of that
fixed eye? Perhaps we strangers all meet somewhere in each other’s
sight.
VI
Puzzles and Speculations
The Herring Run area, small center of commerce and history, had been my
starting point, but I had hardly begun to follow the alewives on their
whole migratory route between salt water and the ponds above. First
of all I had some background of local hearsay to bring into question.
Did the herrin’ really go all the way down to South America in the
wintertime? Was it true that each fish returned to the stream it was
born in? Did they come inland on their spawning journey and then die,
like the west coast salmon? I overheard a man say, “Poor fish! All that
work just to die!” But that was one interpretation I could dispose of
early, having seen them go back to salt water the year before. Did they
only come in from the Bay at night or on foggy evenings? To find out
would take more watching and waiting than I had done so far.
You might deduce this much to start with: the alewives, only a few at
first, started to come inland in the spring when the brackish waters
from the Stony Brook outlet were warmer than the Bay into which they
flowed, if only by a few degrees. They responded with sensitivity to
the temperature. If the earliest fish were the oldest, it was possible
that the later runs also corresponded to age groups, guessing by their
size, and that the youngest came last of all. Evidently schools of
alewives stay together during their ocean life according to the years
when they were spawned. Yet why, between March and June, any given
schools would come in when they did would be hard to tell.
There are places where you can watch the alewives approach, at the
junction between tidal and inland waters. At Damariscotta, Maine, they
swim up a wide tidal river until a fresh-water stream flows into it
from a height above. I was told that the fish are seen massing and
circling, sometimes for days, at this point, until by some communicated
decision, or joint response--perhaps to pressure of numbers, combined
with the right temperature conditions--they start going up. A cold snap
may make them drop back to tidewater. In the same way, cold weather may
discourage their coming in from Cape Cod Bay.
You can also see them schooling in the Cape Cod Canal at the entrance
to the Bournedale run, but not at Stony Brook where the outlet flows
into the Bay through low sand dunes, or sand flats at low tide.
Whatever the local topography may be, the alewives are evidently
attracted to the warmer currents and the lack of salinity in a stream
where it flows into salt water.
In general the cause of their moving in together from the offshore
depths is their sexual development. I have heard the speculation
that this is affected by the increase in light at this stage of the
season, but unfortunately know no more about it. In any case at the
age of four, or sometimes three, they are ready to spawn, to follow
out the new force that is in them, on an old track. Their timing, when
to migrate, is a question of generation, a decision that has to be
made once again in the earth’s timeless schedule. Perhaps there is a
comparison to be made once more with the weather, in which the element
of surprise is constant during the usual course of the season, the
intangible variant still plaguing prediction. The turns to storm or
sunshine have their own order in the years beyond the immediate one.
Who knows when anything will happen? Suddenly the cicadas start to sing
in the August trees. Why that day or hour? Because “conditions are
just right”? Perhaps, if we could ever track down all the conditions.
Natural acts may be repetitive, but no flight, or song, or new growth
has ever existed before at exactly the same time, pitch, or ratio. They
are part of the indefinite context of generation.
What about the alewives during their years in the sea? Very little
seems to be known. According to _Fishes of the Gulf of
Maine_ by Bigelow and Schroeder: “The alewife is as gregarious
as the herring, fish of a size congregating in schools of hundreds of
individuals (we find record of 40,000 fish caught in one seine haul
in Boston Harbor) and apparently a given school holds together during
most of its sojourn in salt water. But they are sometimes caught mixed
with menhaden, or with herring. Alewives, immature and adult, are often
picked up in abundance in weirs here and there along the coast, and
it is likely that the majority remains in the general vicinity of the
fresh-water influences of the stream-mouths and estuaries from which
they have emerged, to judge from the success of attempts to strengthen
or restore the runs of various streams.... But it is certain that some
of them wander far afield, for catches up to 3,000 to 4,000 pounds per
haul were made by otter trawlers some 80 miles offshore, off Emerald
Bank, Nova Scotia at 60 to 80 fathoms, in March 1936.”
They also say, with circumspection: “It seems likely from the various
evidence that the alewives tend to keep near the surface for the first
year or so in salt water, and while they are inshore when older. But
practically nothing is known of the depths to which they may descend if
(or when) they move offshore, there being no assurance that those taken
by trawlers were not picked up, while the trawls were being lowered or
hauled up again.”
The view that most of the alewives stay in coastal waters near the
fresh waters where they were hatched seems to be generally accepted,
though the proof is sometimes hard to find. They occur at various
depths in the sea as well as considerable distances offshore. They are
as likely to be found in deep as in shallow waters. I am told there
are recorded views that landlocked alewives winter in the deep waters
of Lake Ontario, and that shad, a close relative, have been found with
near-bottom animals in their stomachs. I also have the information that
during the summer of 1956 draggers in Passamaquoddy Bay were catching
a large quantity of alewives and that “it looked as if they were near
bottom.” Despite some having been picked up in weirs close to the shore
at various times during the year, they have not commonly, if at all,
been taken by draggers on the continental shelf except when approaching
the shore during the spawning season. In other words their oceanic
whereabouts have not been pinned down. All we can say, still presuming
stocks are local along the coast, is that mature alewives move in from
deeper waters offshore in the springtime, progressively later from
south to north.
What might seem to be a curious exception to the rule is a run in
St. John Harbor, New Brunswick, that occurs in the dead of winter.
Alewives are taken there in late January and early February; but I find
that this may not be so peculiar a phenomenon as it sounds. To begin
with, St. John Harbor is joined with the Bay of Fundy, and when the
fish move into it they are still at sea. The reasons for their move
at that time is not clear, but as there appears to be winter seining
of alewives farther down the coast along the shores of neighboring
Charlotte County, it is at least not unbelievable. The alewives then
start through the harbor and move up the St. John River to their
spawning grounds in the usual migratory months of April and May. I am
told by the St. Andrews Biological Station that: “The inflow of the St.
John River, particularly in April and May, dilutes the harbor water,
especially at the surface. Whether it attracts alewives to the harbor
or carries them there by deep circulation is a question.” This last
point brings up the problem, quite beyond my powers to understand, of
how the alewives orient themselves, how they find or are attracted to
the waters in which they spawn. We may know very little about their
life at sea, but their ability to find a particular stream or river may
be an even greater mystery, which is not lessened by the probability
that they have been there before. Whether as first-year spawners or
repeaters the alewives seem to come back to the streams from which they
migrated during the first summer and fall of their lives--when they
were not more than a few inches in length. Not consistently--a certain
amount of shifting between schools and change of locale may go on. Many
go astray like migrating birds, or men out of crowds perhaps, but in
general they do tend to return to their home streams. As a proof of
this, ponds that were empty of alewives have been stocked with them,
and the spawn returned as adults in three or four years’ time. This is
the “parent stream” theory. With salmon it has apparently been shown
to be a fact; although it is not so much the stream they were born
in to which they return as the stream in which they grew up. Salmon
eggs have been taken out of one river, moved to another, and then the
hatched fry were tagged. They migrated to the sea and returned to spawn
in the second river where they had their growth.
So what is to account for the alewives being able to find a “parent
stream” that might be only a few yards wide, out of all the great
stretches of the Atlantic coastline? They left it when they were no
more than one and two-fifths to four inches long, but somehow, growing
up in the sea, they must always have been oriented to that home base.
They may have stayed reasonably near by, but even so this ability is
hard to fathom.
Disregarding the question of how they arrived at that point, how could
they tell one stream from another? They enter innumerable rivers,
streams, inlets, some of them in close proximity. One theory has it
that they are able to find their home waters by their characteristic
odor, their special composition, to which they were conditioned when
young. Even so, how did they get there? How can fish way offshore in
waters of a consistent temperature, without any landmarks, tell which
direction will take them to their home street? It is quite likely that
they would be able to detect the outlet waters where they merged with
the sea, but a stream may not reach very far, perhaps a few hundred
yards or more at low tide, before being totally absorbed. All the way
along the coasts, rivers and streams pour in fresh water, mixed in the
estuaries so that it is brackish when it reaches the sea. The sea water
increases in salinity as it gets deeper over the continental shelf. An
alewife may detect very slight differences in salinity comparatively
far out, but we are still not much closer to realizing how it finds its
way.
What it amounts to is that no particular factors seem to be able
to explain this directional ability of theirs. Not the response to
changing currents in the spring sea, not the perception by fish of
varying pressures in salt water, or of differences in salinity,
nor their possible ability to use the sun as a reference point in
navigation ... none of these approaches have yet solved the great
mystery. Do they have some special sense, some perceptiveness, about
which we know nothing? Scientists have measured and probed their
reactions for a long time, but so far have not found any evidence of
a special sensory ability. Biologically, fish do have several unique
characteristics. For example, they have an “air bladder” by means of
which they are able to adjust themselves to changing densities in the
water. They also possess a “lateral line” organ, consisting of a tube
or canal under the skin filled with mucus and connected to the nervous
system. This sense, closely associated with hearing, enables them to
detect vibrations of a very low intensity in the water and to avoid
obstacles, such as an approaching bank or another fish. Aside from
that, fish can smell, they have sight, and they have a sense of touch
and taste.
These known senses are what scientists count on in investigating the
migratory behavior of fish. They test their responses to different
stimuli. On that basis, one of the most recent directions to be
explored centers around the environmental factors which the fish
are subjected to, such as currents, temperatures, the physical and
chemical nature of the waters through which they swim. These factors
are supposed to guide them successively on their migrations and to be
so consistent year after year that the responsive fish return to their
streams of origin because they never got off the track. Different
schools, or age groups, of alewives would go to separate streams,
because they responded differently, as Gerald B. Collins puts it in
his study of alewives at Bournedale, “to the existing patterns of
environmental stimuli.” Homing, from the environmentalists’ point of
view, is neither a matter of memory nor mystery.
I do not have enough knowledge behind me to discuss such a method or
approach, but it does seem to have the advantage of comprehensiveness,
of taking the whole journey in. It does not depend on any single factor
to explain migratory behavior, and it provides a good long track of
exploration, step by step.
Whether the migrant fish behave as mechanically as this suggests,
or whether the factors involved are separately either as consistent
as they are supposed to be, or amount in the aggregate to as much as
they should, remains to be seen. We are still in the realm of theory,
however rationally expressed, and do not know yet how the fish find
their destination.
Can a fish judge its course by the sun, or by the circulation of the
waters of which it is so much a part? Can we talk about a homing
instinct, or orienting ability, in connection with it? What are we
defining? I don’t think I beg the question by finding it pertinent that
civilized human beings have to some extent lost their ability to find
their way in the woods, or no longer rise and sleep with the sun, or
that they are not aware of the changing tides. Some old directional
knowledge may still be innate in us, though we seem to think we have no
need of it. Our puzzle, or lack of definition, may lie with ourselves
as much as the alewives. In any case, what we try to find out by fact
or abstraction is already known to the fish.
They are still ahead of us. So much of their motion seems to be a part
of the race as a whole, synonymous with its great water world, that it
is almost as if they found their way like the wind and tides, elemental
forces that we find it hard to evaluate. We try to pin down that which
expands immeasurably beyond us.
VII
Port of Entry
With a certain amount of half-determined knowledge behind me, I decided
early one morning to follow up the question of how far the brackish
waters of the Stony Brook outlet extended into Cape Cod Bay, and so
went down to Paine’s Creek. This is the place where the stream, which
has been winding through tidal marshes like a small river, ends in a
basin where several dories are moored, then takes a last turn and long
curve, cutting through low dunes anchored by beach grass that border
the sands. I saw a kingfisher rising up over the creek, a green crab
shifting along the shelving bank; and on the beach were the remains of
a black duck, sodden, bedraggled, the feathers loaded with wet sand,
the breastbone sticking up like the white prow of a helmet, flies
buzzing over it--the smell of salted carrion around it.
The sound of the waters along the creek is constant and musical,
following and followed up, broadly roaring, rushing, or slipping
lightly, as they rise, pushed back by the incoming tide, or run out
low and easy with the ebb. At low tide these creek waters spread
their channels and fingered rivulets some three hundred yards straight
out over the sands, to a point where they are joined by the waters of
Quivett Creek which has an inlet a few hundred yards upshore to the
west. Then the one channel finds its way past a fish weir until it is
lost in the salt waters coming in over a long bar in the distance. The
alewives also swim into the other creek; though not in the numbers that
run up Stony Brook, because of less access to spawning grounds beyond.
The tide was well out when I started to follow, or rather taste the
fresh water over the sands. The Brewster flats, as they are called,
were alive with light and constantly changing where they stretched
out on the earth’s curve. Minor investigation took place in maximum
horizons. I walked toward the weir, or fish trap, one of three in
the distance, long-poled stockades a quarter of a mile or so apart,
hung with nets like veils or the peaked coifs of nuns. A silver sun
was beginning to lift through sheets of low fog, and a cool wind blew
across the sands. It made my ears boom with that hollow sound of deep
marine that you hear in a shell. I saw a small flock of brant standing
off, their heads alert for danger, ready to thrust up and go when I
came. I approached lines of brown dunlins, red-backed sandpipers,
sanderlings, black-bellied plovers, which stood and scurried, peeped
and cried, flew forward into the wind for short stretches, and came
down again.
As the sun rose farther up, clouds began to be reflected in the lanes
between the ribbed sands, and there were thousands of gulls standing in
a silver, immeasurable distance, while those sharp, light arrows, the
terns, flew overhead. The flats with their brown deserts, their lakes,
and pools, and veins, were like the patterned floors, the reaches of
the great civilizations of man. The dawn fogs blew off. I was waking up
to an architecture of space.
Now from these tidal areas the plains of the sea rove out indefinitely.
You can get a look at the universal map without benefit of signposts,
and the coming on of fish represents great standards of inevitability.
“But look,” a scientist might say, “in this unlimited space of yours,
the mating animal only has a tiny area to travel in; a few miles at
sea, if in the case of the alewives, they do stay offshore, and perhaps
two or three miles inland. They are limited in space, and limited in
numbers accordingly.”
True, but we might add that it is this limitation, in alewives at
least, that makes increase possible. They are one of the most easily
managed of all marine species. Clear out the obstructions in their
way; restock a lake and river system, or pond and stream, and the fish
return, the population rises. Alewife management depends on their
almost relentless drive to go back where they came from. No life
insists on its locality more strongly. Home in their case is a definite
route, a round way, small if you like, but spinning in larger circles,
where birth leads back to its necessity.
So I walked the sea lands, following the alewives’ avenue of approach.
Well beyond the weir I began to get in too deep to qualify as an
investigator. I judged that the brackish water of the outlet went
at least five hundred yards out, and probably several hundred yards
more than that, before it flowed into the salt waters of the Bay and
then was lost in them. It seemed, during low tide at least, that the
alewives might detect the fresh water reasonably far out in the Bay,
disregarding the question of how they arrived at that point.
As I went back across the wind again, under the hovering, crying birds,
and saw where the waters of the two creeks came out, that strange fish
knowledge of where to go was still unbelievable. I imagined alewives
coming in here, or to a shore where there were even more creek inlets
fairly close together, and wondered whether the schools joined in
the Bay like concentric circles and then separated, each going to
the stream in which it grew up. I also wondered about that supposed
chemical sense, or sense of odor, that might explain the alewife’s
knowledge of its home stream. Would not the composition of the waters
of any one stream change greatly at various times of the year? It must
be very different in the hot summer, when the little alewives come
down to salt water, from the cool months of spring when the adults
came in. Would that not be just as important a factor as the stream’s
difference from another close by?
Two miles farther up along the shore is another inlet at the mouth
of Sesuit Creek. Many years ago the Sesuit and Quivett inlets were
interconnected at some point back in their tidal marshes; and before
the roads and banks were built that now divide them there was also
more access to several ponds in the vicinity, both large and small.
Since the glacial ponds of Cape Cod seem to fill up and dry out in
time, turning to wooded or grassy hollows, it is possible too that the
alewives had even more entryways, and went even farther inland, having
longer fresh-water routes to travel--water veins open and flowing
everywhere. In any event, the alewife population now starting up these
two inlets is very small compared to that of Stony Brook, which shows
that the fish are balanced in numbers according to the relative ease
or difficulty of getting inland to adequate spawning grounds. In part,
it also seems to be an added proof of the parent stream theory. The
fish know their way. For whatever reason, and whether or not they are
entirely consistent in coming back to the exact stream, it seems to us
that they have a remarkable sense of direction, although, for all we
know, it may not be any more remarkable than the accuracy of the tides
or the timing of the sun.
VIII
The Common Night
Did the alewives choose the night or late evening hours to come in by?
So I had been told. By daylight evidence, the fish population increased
at the Herring Run on the mornings following a nightly high tide. I
had also heard that there were more alewives running during the tides
of the full moon, in the farthest monthly reaches of ebb and flood;
but this was a correlation that would be hard for me to make without
more years to judge by. In the middle of May on the days just after the
first quarter of the moon, which came on the sixteenth, the fish seemed
to be running just about as hard as they did during the days preceding
the full moon in April, which had appeared on the twenty-fourth.
Judging accordingly, it seemed as though their migration had its own
ebb and flood during those months. All this was not much better than
impression plus hearsay, but there seemed to be some justice to the
night tide theory, so, to begin with, I went down to the shore late one
evening during an incoming tide to see if there might be any sign of
the alewives.
About eight o’clock, an hour before high tide, the tide was running
strongly in at Paine’s Creek. The channel in the marshes flooded over
its banks and marsh grasses were floating and stirring as the swaying
waters rose around them. It was near dark. I could see some seaweed
flinging by against the sandy bottom at the mouth of the creek, and a
big, ghostly green eel slithered up at the edge of the bank the waves
were licking, seemed to look up at me, looped back into the water, and
disappeared; but it was too dark to see much more than those black
clumps of seaweed racing by. I saw a group of gulls standing in shoal
waters beyond the beach, where waves were rolling in hard under a
steady northwest wind. The sun’s cauldron had dropped down, a raw,
glistening orange-red, into the sea and back of the curved horizon,
leaving its horizontal flush behind.
[Illustration]
I walked back under the lee of the sand banks bordering the curving
creek. The tide was pulsing and roaring, its waters loping in to the
creek which began to turn a harder, darker blue under the sky. Then I
began to hear the innumerable soft slaps of fish breaking the surface.
The alewives were making their entry from the sea.
And the gulls proclaimed their coming. Out in the Bay, they began to
gather by the hundreds, clambering up with a scrambled yelping and
hollering. The last smoky, red line of sunset was disappearing and
they hovered over it in a maddened, high, wide swarm like huge bees.
It grew darker, and a black-crowned night heron, or “quawk,” sometimes
“quok,” a name true to the sound it makes, flew by with rounded wings
against a star. The gulls began to disappear, streaming faintly like
ashes against the last fires on the sea, but still crying vastly and
collectively toward a world of distances. And in terrible simplicity,
the alewives were swimming toward the inland gauntlet they would have
to run, having a title, by their common, wild, and ancient advent, to
all great kindled things. Who will see more than that in his short
life, with its many meetings and separations?
I by an old and natural right felt a fierce water-deep wonder of the
spirit. The beyondness in me went back to its beginnings. I thought of
the nights on which children I have known were born, and of the voyages
of war, leave-takings at railroad stations and at ports of embarkation,
and of dreams in which I struggled toward new meetings and other lives.
The wind blew through the arches of the stars, and the surfaces of the
dipping earth, water, and sky in their lasting communion made me dizzy.
I felt a cold inevitable grandeur, below consciousness, a swim and go
in an uttermost wild world, past home or my life’s memory.
So by this evidence the alewives came in at night, and, as a further
discovery not to be denied, so had I. Perhaps it was the closest
I would ever get to the non-human fish in a darkness where all
the components of existence ran the same race. That real depth,
fish-oriented, nakedly omnipotent, fills men when they recognize it
with more awe than their limited worlds can encompass.
As I started back, about a quarter of an hour before the full tide,
headlights swept over where the road ended at the shore, and in a
minute or two a couple of fishermen lurched down the sand with high
rubber waders on, carrying their casting rods. They stood on the beach
in the dark, one of them coaching the other in baiting his hook. I came
up and spoke to them, hardly able to make out their faces. The older
one, he who did the coaching, told me that they had just got a pail of
herrin’ from the Brewster run to use as bait. They had hopes that there
would be some bass here, the famous “stripers” chasing the alewives in.
They brought their long rods sideways and back to sling the bait out
into the black and silver waves. The older man spoke low words against
the wind, and I strained to hear him. Suddenly he thought he felt what
must be alewives nosing his line and bumping against it on their way
by into the mouth of the inlet. Last year, he told me, he had seen
hundreds of them dead on the flats, and the gulls, he said, had slit
their sides open as if with knives to get the roe. The waves had begun
to slacken off when I left, and the fishermen were still casting, but
without much hope of a strike.
IX
The Hunt
For a little while I felt satisfied that I knew the alewives only
chose to come in on the night or late evening tides, until they proved
me wrong. I say _they_ proved me wrong because I give myself no
credit for more than moderately ignorant perseverance in following up a
hypothesis. The alewives did a good deal of proving and disproving for
me. They would probably show me up again.
At the beginning of the third week in May there had been a fresh run
of fish crowding into the Herring Run, if not as heavily as those that
came in a month before. After the migration starts there are very few
days in either April or May when some fish are not to be seen in the
brook waters. One man can only judge by eye plus the amount of barrels
being hauled out as to how many there are in any period, but there may
have been a climactical run during the week after the nineteenth of
May when the high tides came at night. On the twenty-first I had been
taking temperature readings, out of curiosity and to keep up with the
advancing season. It had been around 40 degrees Fahrenheit during the
night and rose to 47 at 7:30 A.M., 53 at 9:00 and 55 at 9:30
as the sun’s rays heated the land. Just offshore, down the beach from
Paine’s Creek, at around 9:30, high tide being at 9:57, the temperature
of the salt water, more consistent than the land, was 49, and the
reading I then took of the brackish water at the mouth of the creek was
51.
I noticed a small crew of alewives in the tea-dark channel. Had they
come in the night before? They were schooling back and forth, as though
getting accustomed to the waters in which they newly found themselves.
The tide began to turn. The waters going out at the creek mouth were
yellow-green. I walked along the beach, and the surface of the Bay was
long and smooth, a blue-green stretching and easing under a light wind
with purple patches showing above seaweed and shelving banks of peat.
I could hear the slow, gentle, labial sounds of the lightly ebbing
waters. There was a small school of unidentifiable minnows turning
and slipping-in-silver just offshore. A long frieze pattern of gull
tracks showed, where the sand was damp, crisscrossed here and there by
the little tracks of sandpipers and plovers. This cool, seaside world
seemed full of equipoise to me, with a searching air of freedom playing
over.
There had been several clumps of herring gulls standing in shoals in
the creek where it flowed out into the Bay. I noticed that some of them
had begun to fly up. Then I saw a great black-backed gull swoop at the
water farther out, and a number of herring gulls beyond it plummeting
down, then chasing each other over the surface. They were after fish,
but what kind? I went off for twenty minutes to get some field glasses,
and by the time I returned the gulls had increased by the hundreds. Big
clouds of them were circling and moving in from up the coast, higher
and higher like drifting paper, some of them way up in the blinding
blue sky, but coming closer, joining the feast.
I could see that the gulls were diving straight down the course of
the Paine’s Creek waters where they went out into the Bay, and that
the fish they flung up between them clearly had the general size and
shape of alewives. What was going on then was a great interception.
The fish in their deliberate way had found the mouth of the creek, and
made their instinctive move to go in, but as the water became shallower
during the ebb tide they were ripe prey for the birds and there was no
turning back.
The violent, reckless activity of the gulls went on all morning. In
the way they have of riding each other: “You’ve got it. Show you can
keep it!” they were picking up fish, dropping them, and running away
with them again, in a scrambling frenzy. There seemed to be almost more
excitement, more energy, spent in the chase than in the fruits of it,
though they gobbled what they could. I could hear an over-all sound of
struggle as their wings rushed and they yawked and screamed. This world
seemed pantingly, gruntingly, wildly busy.
The victims of this natural slaughter seemed to have moved on a little,
with their fatal determination, but as the tide and morning ebbed the
white, frantic crowd above them seemed to stay in the same general
area. It was not likely that many fish managed to reach the inlet. I
imagined them dashing from side to side or circling in panic, the crowd
knowing nothing but its own entity and safety. I talked to a man who
was watching the scene from the window of his car. He told me that
there had been a high bluff, washed away some years back, from which
you could actually see the fish in the water as they struggled to swim
in.
“We had a good stream went out there that wouldn’t a happened,” he
said, suggesting that if there were a deeper channel meeting the
Bay waters, most of the fish might be able to get up the creek in
comparative safety.
Along this stretch of rhythmic work of greed and death little groups
of gulls began to settle down on the water, glutted and loaded down.
Then long lines of them, looking like white shoals, rested on the water
upshore, digesting their meal. Low tide that afternoon came at 3:57. By
two o’clock when the sands began to show, well out toward the weirs,
the great tribal company of gulls were finished with the hunt. For a
mile along the flats they were standing into a stiff wind. In the
distance I could see a litter of dead fish along the bed of the creek
waters. When I walked out I saw them, silver, blue, and white, with
brassy tints from the sun, flung along, strewn on like debris through a
wide city square.
Even though there may be no waste in nature--with everything used,
fired, and consumed in the interactions of the living world--what an
enormous, careless expenditure! The bed of the outgoing waters was
paved with this alewife coinage for hundreds of yards. Each one I
picked up, and there were thousands, had its body scraped and clawed,
or its head torn, its eyes gouged out. For every one gobbled during the
chase there must have been many more left uneaten. Remembering what
the night fishermen had said, it seemed like an indiscriminate feast,
and it was not clear to me that the gulls were primarily after roe.
But since fish eggs are a delicacy to other animals, gulls may find a
special enjoyment in them too.
So the alewives did not choose to come in by night or evening only,
seeing that they chose to come in by day--provided there was much
choice in the matter. I heard the theory put forward that they must
have been chased in by bass; but if they were so chased, it did not
seem likely that they would choose the narrow waters of this particular
creek for refuge, or have that much calculation in them. That is not
why they came in. Those thousands of years the alewives had migrated
provided their own track. The fish knew instinctively when and where
to go, and all risks were incidental to that. The only possibility was
that they might have been schooling around in the farthest reaches
of the creek waters in the bay and were hurried in by the bass; but
they were there first. Many others may have gone in the night before.
Those trying to come in during the morning waited their turn after
an ebb tide. This rhythmic deliberation and then going seemed very
characteristic of the fish as I had watched them in inland waters, and
in a larger way it might be similar to their schooling in salt water.
I found out subsequently that the alewives coming into the Bournedale
run in the Cape Cod Canal do so both day and night, but that there is
less chance of the gulls intercepting them there because of the deeper
waters.
I went down to Paine’s Creek the following morning, May 22, and the
frenzied hunt was going on again. I had checked the previous night and
did so the night of this day too and there were no fish coming in, so
far as I could tell. There was no sign of them in the water during the
late evening, no sound of their soft slapping on the surface later on.
It is my impression that though they start into the creek in the
dark--perhaps not later than ten-thirty or eleven o’clock--they do not
move upstream very much until daylight comes. Sunlight stimulates them,
or, to be exact, its radiation. You can see them swimming up faster in
Stony Brook after the bright sunlight warms the water in the morning.
They might enter the creek more successfully under the protection of
fog, or darkness, combined with deep water, but did not prefer such
conditions to broad daylight. When the temperature was right and they
were physiologically ready, alewife schools began to move in from salt
water on an incoming tide ... swing in might be a better term, since a
circular movement is characteristic and sends them on. According to my
observation, incidentally, this is very likely to be counterclockwise.
In any case the power and direction of the migration came from their
combined rhythmic impulses.
Alewives seemed to me to demand a study of universal motions and their
interrelationships. The body of a fish must have in it the declination
of the globe and all its years. If I had read some of my limited
science reading correctly, there was a time system in the world of
life which had nothing to do with clocks, and their specific minutes
and hours. It was built into its creatures so that their stages of
development, their growth and movements, followed the direction and
change of all other forces affecting them. It is a running world; and
who, in that context, is more automatic than another?
X
Transition: Salt and Fresh
The change, for those fish that make it in, is from salt to fresh,
wide to narrow, deep to shallow. Watched at Paine’s Creek in the first
sheltered inland curve, the movement of those I was able to see was
like the movement of tides and estuary waters, a flowing back and
forth, a waving and interweaving. Some dropped back like leaves, then
swam up again with the rest as they all turned together. At the start
of an incoming tide--when the salt water moved in under the fresh and
the creek began to rise--the fish seemed stimulated and swam faster,
back and forth against it. Then gradually, though it was hard to see
them in the high tide waters, they appeared to move farther up the
inlet.
It was an encounter at the dramatic approaches of sea and land, on the
long shoreline where continuous transitions are made between water and
earth and air.
If you say the “anadromous habit” started somewhere in geologic time,
it is difficult to conceive of, and it is probably not accurate, in
the sense that these adaptations to environment do not start so much
as develop and evolve. In any event the incredibly long history of
the earth is not broken down with any facility. First of all, leaving
out the question of whether fish originally evolved in fresh waters
or the sea, and then blithely skipping one hundred million years or
so, you have an evolved race of alewives, established residents of the
sea. As to their habit of spawning in fresh water, it is possible that
alewives, like other coastal fish, may gradually have explored the
inland rivers and streams, until they began to use their comparative
quiet and refuge in which to spawn. Along the northern coasts their
inland migration would have been interrupted during the glacial epochs,
and their range would have started farther to the south. There are
landlocked varieties of alewife in Lake Ontario and in New York State,
which also suggests a period when the continental glaciers retreated,
leaving an access by water to inland lakes from the sea which was later
cut off. In any case this anadromous habit was arrived at gradually,
involuntarily, over a very long time. But, in a sense, what you see
_now_, your center of history, is a routine which is neither old
nor new but both various and inexorable, having in it the pull of the
land, the blood of the sea.
This starting, circulatory movement of the few small schools I had seen
was succeeded by the swimming of steady herds in the brown water of
the channel. I couldn’t find them at first. On the ebb tide, when the
water had receded enough from the banks along the inlet I walked there
for a while and then cut across the tidal marsh. The day was cool and
fresh, with a light northeast wind lifting in, and it smelled of the
sea. (You can live a mile or so inland on the narrow peninsula of Cape
Cod, in the towns or oak woods, and never smell that rich combination
of salt water, shellfish, and tidal marsh, unless the wind is from
the right quarter, with a special condition of the atmosphere.) Light
rippled up the broad inlet--the coppery waters seemed to move slowly
and reliantly. The season had hatched its enthusiasms everywhere, from
flies, to crabs, to birds. The tidal ground was pitted with holes made
by fiddler crabs. They backed away in front of me, the males comically
holding up their one big claw--little characters of a dull metal-blue,
with bubbling mouths--and disappeared into the safety of their burrows.
Ahead of me nine Canada geese, which had been resting and feeding in
the marshes, unfolded their wings and lunged up and out toward the Bay.
Then two black ducks flew off quacking in their deep, wild way. I saw
where a deer had left fresh hoofprints in the mud; looking down at them
made me notice many tiny shells, newly hatched whelks perhaps, carried
in by the tide, strewn between the stiff spikes of the marsh grass; and
I found a couple of empty pint bottles, sometimes as common in these
parts as Kleenex beside the highways of America. Insects, shells,
ducks, geese, crabs, wind, cloud rack overhead, brilliance and shadows
on the tidal ground--many lifetimes of learning. Is there any man who
knows the length and breadth of anything, let alone a creek? Yet such a
place keeps announcing its novelties and exacting from us whatever love
and discipline we are capable of; or so I felt, challenged in the keen
air and the high glitter of the light.
Several hundred yards around another bend in the inlet, where it was
some twelve to fifteen feet wide, I looked down into the water and saw
them again. The dark channel was alive with them. It had a floor of
turning, slowly moving alewives. A few at the end of this school would
run quickly back, revealing their shadows on the bottom. The procession
moved back and forth, as smoothly as the flow of the water, and across
the entire width of the channel. They were more numerous in the areas
where the sun hit the water directly.
Some of them looked torn and scarred. On that basis, and because many
thousands had either been trucked off from the Herring Run in barrels
by this time, or had reached the ponds, spawned, and returned to
the Bay, you could not say categorically that they were all moving
inland. As the season develops you can always find spent fish on
their way to salt water running through those still heading up to
the spawning areas. Aside from watching their movements, one method
of distinguishing between the two classes of fish is to see if they
bear any white patches on their backs and sides. A certain number of
the spent fish will show fungus growths after a period of time in
fresh water. What seems to happen is that an alewife, attacked by a
gull or predatory fish or flung against sharp rocks, will at first
show a “scaling” from the damage. This scaling, unless it is more
than that, a mortal wound, is likely to develop into a fungus growth,
which sometimes covers a large part of a fish’s body; but without,
apparently, any added injury. I believe experiment proves that the
fungus disappears fairly soon after the fish affected are back in salt
water.
The returning alewives will stay for a while in the brackish water of
the inlet, resting and feeding. They are spare and hungry and will feed
on shrimp, small eels, and small fish. Alewives that by chance stay
longer than the others in fresh water have been known to chase and eat
their own young, if they were small enough to swallow.
Their basic salt-water diet is plankton. The copepods and
amphipods--tiny animals similar to the well-known sand hoppers, beach
fleas, water fleas, or small shrimp--provide the staple part. On their
inland migration they will not eat much of anything. They are in the
service of a mission, and they fast. Still there may be occasions when
they snap at lures. I have heard of some, migrating inland, that were
caught by fishermen casting with flies at the Herring River in Harwich,
on the south side of the Cape.
Those herds now in the brown waters of the channel seemed to be
gradually moving inland as the day advanced, and I guessed that for
most of them it was the journey up.
As I watched them there was a slight, quick change of wind, a shift in
the breeze that flicked the water, and in the crosshatches this made on
the bright surface all the fish disappeared. Then the surface cleared
and I could see them again, swimming through a rippling weave of light
that was reflected on the channel floor.
They meandered along, an occasional lively one dashing through the
rest, or rushing up to the surface. I could hear light plops, faint
flips along the water. I walked closer to the edge so that my shadow
fell across them, and they turned back in one quick and graceful
stampede, some of them dashing to deeper water under the opposite bank.
That so many separate entities should have such an immediate response
to one another that they all moved like the beat of a wing was hard for
one individual to understand.
Alewives are able to stand the quick change from salt to fresh water
without any trouble. It would kill some other kinds of fish, but
neither the alewife fry growing up in fresh water nor adults growing
up in the sea seem to mind being taken out of one medium and plunged
into another. They are adapted to both. On the other hand, repeated
changes, such as occur sometimes under certain conditions in tidal
estuaries, are said to be able to kill them.
These changes, incidentally, are registered in an alewife’s scales. To
read them is difficult and requires a competent biologist. In general
they mark physiological changes, such as occur when young alewives
go from fresh to brackish water, or when the adults spend some time
in fresh water before returning to the sea. An alewife’s age can be
determined because a record of each spawning migration is etched on the
scales.
I had seen them flashing and swarming inland up in the Herring Run
area, but in this wide channel were new motions that needed more
patience and information to be understood. For example, where the
fish eddied and wheeled under the dazzling rays, I noticed one group
idling in front of a submerged sand bar or reef that ran across the
channel. I waited there for three-quarters of an hour before the fish
showed signs of any common impulse to cross over it. One or two dashed
over sportively to chase a minnow and then sped back, but the rest
of them--a hundred or more--would make no move. Finally, after many
circling approaches by the whole crowd, the measure of their circle
came closer and closer out of the brown water to the brightly lit,
coppery bar, until some of the vanguard spilled over. Then more and
more sped and skittered over until the move was accomplished. Why?
Were they afraid of the brightness? Did the contrast in light stop them
in some way? This would hardly seem consistent with what I had found
out so far. Perhaps it was just routine to their motion. Evidently
alewives idle in the deeper channels where the velocity of the water is
slower and easier to swim in. They respond to the relative force of the
flow. Where the current is more uniformly rapid, and they are going up
against it, they progress steadily. And perhaps the bar formed an eddy
behind it, so that the water where they swam moved against the current
in the channel and they were unable to tell their direction.
The alewife hordes puzzled me as they moved slowly but definitely
through the channel. A new animal, moving to unknown needs is hard to
understand. You grasp for some translation between you that will not
come. Relationships in the water world seem to need other senses than
your own. It could be said that to understand the transition of the
alewives from salt to fresh water and back you must know about the
effect of the endocrine glands on the reproductive system, as well as
adaptations of the kidney, along with the temperature, the time of the
tides, and the chemical composition of a particular stream--just to
begin with. If you are wise and devoted enough to put all the known
factors together, you may come out with a unified interpretation, and
be abreast of the latest theories of process. Knowledge is the motion
by which the human animal may come closest to a fish. Still I looked
in my ignorance for another familiarity in which we shared. Where the
sea pushed inland and the alewives moved ahead or returned, I saw an
indefinite route, of surpassing, complex elaboration; but in their
pulse and tempo I felt something that gave me present assurance, and a
touch of joy.
XI
Up the Valley
When you leave the channel that elbows through the tidal marshes and
then goes under the shore road, Route 6 A, through the valley ending
at the Herring Run, you go from one living community to another. You
leave the thousands of fiddler crabs tunneling through marshy ground,
the fat, olive-colored little salt-water minnows, or mummichogs,
darting through green clouds of muck in the warm pools left by the
tide, and muskrats, kingfishers, herons, ducks, or gulls. Some are
permanent residents, others are itinerants, but all are presently bound
together in the tidal grounds. They feed off one another, being both
producers and consumers of food, and so sustain the balance of all
their lives together. Such communities are the principal study of the
ecologists--the interrelationship of living things in their environment.
The alewife migrates from sea to ponds through the inland vein, from
crabs and shellfish to robins, and frogs beyond the tide. Its migration
runs through several different life communities, of which it is not
strictly a part, although its progeny, the fry, will be a part of
the food chain all the way along, the prey of many different kinds
of fish and birds, and eaters themselves of food the ponds provide.
But the alewife’s migrant continuity is like the water itself that
runs unceasingly down the valley, and ties all the life together that
adjoins it.
The stream, on the north side of the shore road, used to run up the
center of the valley where there is still a ditch dividing once
cultivated cranberry bogs, but the watercourse was long since diverted
to the eastern side of the valley. It was in that direction I went one
half-showery, half-sunny day for a further exploration, but first by
way of the short, bordering range of hills before going down again.
Hills and scoured valley were left by the most recent continental
glacier as it melted back from the terminal moraine of Cape Cod perhaps
some twelve thousand years ago. I climbed the steep slope on the west
side of the valley, nearest the Herring Run. Below me the long, snaky
turns of the run went down from its rocky top where the waters were
churning white and spilling over. As I walked up and down the slopes
and across the small ravines between them, I could hear voices receding
down by the Herring Run; and then a woodchuck whipped a whistle and
dove when I came up, its brown rump disappearing into a freshly dug
hole, which had an arc of sandy yellow dirt piled outside. On the way
there were wild cherry, viburnum, hawthorn, pitch pine, and juniper
sparsely growing, and I passed a dipping stone wall that marked an old
boundary line. I picked up a wing from the remains of a dead herring
gull on the ground, put it before the light wind, and was struck with
what broad strength it held the air. As I came toward that knob of a
hill where the gulls congregated, they flocked away with a simultaneous
rush of wings and went crying high toward the Bay. The hill was bald,
except for a few wild rosebushes on its crown, and its slopes were
covered with a wild pink, moss campion, and patches of sorrel made
more profuse by nitrogen and ammonia from gull droppings. On the other
side of the valley there was a wood of twirling, gnarled, gray tupelo
trees with the pink of their buds still showing. Bay waters and the
curving, final shore carried distance out along with the gulls; while
this valley with its dips and slopes and the migratory waves of life to
which its land and water were hosts seemed wide enough for many worlds.
As I clambered down a slope toward the stream, three ducks that were
coming in to settle on marshy ground changed course, two black-crowned
night herons flew out of a tree, clucking like hens, and a yellowlegs
stalking through muddy peninsulas flew up and away, its sickle wings
in reckless flight, with a cry both tremulous and sharp. Everything
fled before me. I might be a part of these communities myself but as
an itinerant, it seemed, and a dangerous one. How difficult it is to
prove to anything but domestic animals, long since tamed and lost, that
a man is not dangerous! Men have a hard time trying to prove it to
themselves.
I had come down near the point where Stony Brook started to turn to the
east side of the valley. The banks behind me were streaming with spring
water and the wet edges were lush with new growth: lettuce-green grass,
succulent-looking leaves of skunk cabbage, fiddlehead ferns newly
uncurling, and clumps of violets, flowers of a sky-delicate light blue.
At this edge of the valley the water was full of thicketed islands,
hummocks, and muddy shallows, but as the stream stretched on, ten to
twelve feet wide, the current swung along at a man’s fast walk over a
brown and sandy bottom, and in it, constantly eddying by and turning
over, were innumerable silver fish scales, debris of the striving and
death at the Herring Run, several hundred yards behind.
Where the stream turned at right angles across the valley it was
bordered by a low man-made dike. Halfway down the dike, at the end
of a long narrow ditch bisecting the old bogs, was the remains of a
_stop water_, a kind of three-sided dam designed to raise or lower
the water in a cranberry bog to its desired level. I looked down into
its still, dark square of water and there was a split-second rush of
a fish, and perhaps two or three others coiling in the small space
together. They may have been spawning. In any case, intentionally
or not, they had come down the ditch instead of by the main stream
and could go no farther. There are many areas in a run, side pools,
ditches, marshy land, to which some alewives may be sidetracked, before
the main spawning grounds.
I saw a few later in a dead-end offshoot of the Herring River that
looked very much as if they were trying to go back, though I have no
reason to suppose they felt that they had made a mistake. If they were
not ready to spawn they may have circled back with the ebb tide, which
reached that point, and found the main flow where they had lost it on
the way up.
I have idly wondered whether a single fish, isolated from its brethren,
might not suffer some kind of unknown hell of estrangement. I have seen
one swimming wildly down a narrow ditch off a tidal inlet as if it knew
the crowd had left it behind, and was frantic to get back. Still, for
all we can say about their lack of consciousness, they carry out their
great decisions, their deep harmonies, together, by natural laws which
we ourselves cannot completely explain, and by which we too may carry
out our migrant purposes.
The creek flowed on through banks tangled with poison ivy, blueberry
bushes, briars, and grapevines--at times almost impassable. Once, as
I peered out from the tangle, I saw a bird I had never seen outside a
field guide--a Virginia rail, moving along a muddy shelf under the
opposite bank. It moved almost humped over, neck and head forward, like
a great mouse, with a docked tail and red-orange beak. Then farther on
I saw an egret with head and slender neck above some high pitch pines,
pure sky-white, Grecian, out of a stately, impenetrable world, almost
too secret for an ecologist.
Where the stream was wider and the shallow water flowed along, lightly
and unobstructed, a group of some ten or twelve fish ran easily across
it. Then they stopped and circled with the current like a nest of eels,
in a slow, fluid mass.
I turned back. After light sunshine there was a faint shower, a spray
of rain. The valley was full of sound. A slow plane flew over; a
truck’s gears ground over the road; I heard a song sparrow staking out
his territory; crows cawed; blue jays gave harsh and silvery shouts; I
heard my own breath and the almost silent touch of cool air and rain
spray on the ground--a narrow valley, but with melodious resources from
everywhere. Why “back to nature”? I thought. Is there anything in it
but forwardness?
In the stretch below the Herring Run again I suddenly saw, in the
blank, dark water under gray skies, a wave, an eruption, a rushing
ahead of a group of fish. Then they moved over to the side of the
shallow stream, thirty or forty of them, and stayed there almost
stationary for a while in deeper, slower currents where an overhanging
shrub shaded the water. I threw a stick in their direction ... when
it hit the water they wheeled wildly on their group axis, but stayed
in the same place. Then in a minute or two they all made a break for
open water at once, and I noticed that another group had come in unseen
behind them. They would progress in this way, group after group, until
they met the denser population below the fish ladders. One of them
would come out first with a kind of flitting, darting, weaving forward
against the current and the rest wheeled in behind it.
I took off my shoes and waded out into the stream. A lead fish working
its way back and forth with the current swung around as I came and fled
back. I stood still for a while, noticing that the gulls I chased out
of the valley had returned and were hovering over, chuckling, crying,
mumbling, or barking like seals. After a few minutes of waiting the
fish came right through and around my legs. My slightest change in
posture would send the ones in front looping back, but they still kept
coming. It was a quickening thing to see a fish race up in a long reach
and then drop part way back again--a tentative, fast exploration of
the current, the living current as perpetual as its own communicated
impulses.
One hundred yards or so upstream the alewives covered the stream bed
where Stony Brook’s divided waters met. Some schooled slowly around
below the unsurmountable falls, the rocks of death, the majority headed
up the main stream toward the fishway where hundreds were massed,
slipping and turning, arched in the white waters. Fishways are so
designed as to allow the alewives an easier way to mount an incline,
but they do have the effect of concentrating them in narrow quarters.
The resting pools are compartments deep enough to check the velocity of
the water and so permit the fish to wait before leaping on again. Even
so the water roared down with great force on the alewives crammed in
them. I could hardly hold my cupped hand against it. As they leaped up
they were tunneled in spouts of water, and then they would flip through
the boiling surface from one pool to the next, sometimes being thrown
back to try again.
XII
The Imperfect Ladder
There is no such thing, I have been told by men who were in the
business of making them, as a good or even adequate fishway. There is
always an imbalance between the purposes they serve and the results.
All the same, fishways are the best we can do to remedy a situation
that blocked great populations of fish from entry to their natural
routes. They are built to try and bring back what man has taken away;
though it should be said that they are as much in man’s interest as the
alewife’s. Commerce is the main benefactor of their success.
Fishways help open up free passage to the fish, and so increase their
numbers. In a good fishway alewives can be counted or sampled. They can
be taken out and transferred to other areas that are to be stocked with
them. In other words, the removal of obstacles and the construction of
a fish ladder means, in most cases, that a run can either be introduced
or improved, and, above all, kept under control.
The trouble is that they cannot be built so as to result in
free-and-easy passage for the fish at all times. In fact, if they are
not properly placed, they can even be a hindrance. A fishway requires
engineering and research in its preparation. They vary greatly, of
course, according to local conditions. A fish ladder’s length depends
on the distance of the slope down which a flow is directed, or the
kind of banks, rocks, or stream formation through which it is built.
I imagine there are no ideal specifications. For alewives, fishway
construction depends in general on the size and habits of the fish and
the nature of the waters in which they travel. The great fish ladders
built for salmon at the Bonneville Dam, on the Columbia River, have
pools in them that are forty feet wide, sixteen feet long, and six feet
deep, each being a foot above the other. One foot is no problem to the
salmon, which have been known to leap as high as ten.
At Stony Brook the pools on the down, or north, side of the road are
ten in number and various in size, extending some distance downstream.
The first six are smaller and deeper than the others, being so designed
as to round a bend in the stream. Their depth, subtracting several
inches of sand that keeps washing down from the road, is about two feet.
[Illustration]
On the upper side, above the seining pool, leading from one of the pond
outlets, is a straight ladder, some twenty feet long. Its pools are
four and a half feet square and twenty-eight inches deep, each being
about five inches above the other, thus graduating to fit the slope.
Whatever their design, fishways are all built so as to assure the
alewives quick transit from one pool to another. In most cases they
seem to work satisfactorily, but unless they are well managed they
can effect full use of the stream by the migrant fish. Alewives have
their own crowd pressure and motion, their way of moving on, and any
reduction in their numbers at any one time or counterpressure, keeping
them back, may result in a decline because less will get to the ponds
to spawn.
Fishways are more rigid than a natural stream bed, though sometimes
less hazardous. Water levels change; the flow varies both in angle and
pressure; and managers of a good fishway must be constantly on the
alert for new conditions. A marked increase or decrease in the volume
of water, especially as it is reflected at the head of a fish ladder,
which usually has a gate or wooden dam of some kind, may create a
barrier instead of an aid. Unless the adjustment in the dam is just
right the head of water coming down may be almost impossible for a fish
to surmount.
Alewives are not like the muscular west coast salmon with their
spectacular leaps, as if shot by a giant sling. An alewife does not
leap over a pool and up a falls so much as swim through it rapidly,
being a much smaller fish and in smaller streams. If a head of water
coming over a dam or sluice is at the wrong pitch, the fish will not be
able to climb it. In designing a fishway an engineer has to take into
account the relationship between the water head and the angle of the
flow below it, which has to be translated into how far an alewife can
swim at what speed.
A fish is supported by water--an advantage over cumbersome human beings
in their own surrounding medium, the air--its specific gravity being
close to that of its own body. The fish is so made as to swim through
the water with as little resistance as possible. It also gets energy
from the water, orienting itself by the current, or the various changes
of pressure in the flow, the way a bird uses currents in the air. In
so far as a bird is streamlined too, and finds in air pressure and
weight the means to fly up and forward, their actions have something
in common. A bird, like an alewife, may lose its momentum if the angle
of climb gets too steep. Swimming and flying take place in fluid
surroundings.
The difficulty in making an artificial aid like a fishway comes from
the problem, in part, of understanding a fish’s behavior; of meeting
its needs; arranging its passage; trying, if not to control nature, at
least to be a substitute for it. The positive results are plain to see,
but there is something almost as elusive about it as trying to explain
a fish in human language.
At one point along the Herring River in Harwich is a concrete fish
ladder, twenty-five feet long and six feet wide. The pond above was
high, after this same rainy spring, and the waters were roaring and
frothing down. The alewives migrating upstream were being held back.
Only a few I noticed were getting through. The flow had tremendous,
deep force, so that the resting pools were not serving their function,
and most of the fish that did manage by extraordinary effort to reach
the head of water at the top were not able to pass it.
The racing torrent dropped to a wide, shallow basin which ended in the
river winding on within its banks. A continuous long line of fish kept
swimming through to the bottom of the ladder, where they would vainly
skip and twist and strain through the water’s force. Then they swung
back in a semicircular arc across the basin and re-formed at its edge.
There was a wide shiver on the water. They wheeled as in a dance, or
like the planets in pursuit of light, where they ran up again into
the flood. It happened time after time, in this futile but concurrent
motion, a beauty to watch--its tension, effort, and relief were exactly
co-ordinated with the water. These fish _were_ the water. But I
saw in them the mechanics of breath ... contraction and expansion; and
systole, diastole, balance and counterbalance, within the dynamics
of all nature. They showed the push of life against a current, its
running back and leaping forward, its fulfillment and defeat. It was
the alewife circle again, as we have ours, in a motion of entirety; but
almost impossible to translate.
“You never enjoy the world aright,” wrote Thomas Traherne, “till the
sea itself floweth in your veins.” In the knowing and encompassing
sense of his word _enjoy_, we will never know alewives until the
motion, lift, light, weight, and changing beauty of the water is in
some degree a part of us. In any case, we will never build the perfect
fishway.
XIII
Persistence
When the little wire gate on the upper side of the seining pool was
left open during the weekends the fish could pursue their destiny past
the concessionaires. One weekday night during the last run in May some
prankster took the gate out and caused much excitement in the alewives
committee.
“Gawd! Gawd! ... running all night long. Here’s the town selling this
young feller the fish, and he doesn’t get any. We’ll have to put a
padlock on it ...” etc. etc.
I may have had such a delinquent impulse myself at one time, but I kept
it way down.
There are two streams falling into the seining pool. Both start as pond
outlets some fifty yards above, one with the fish ladder going down
from it, and the other falling into a pool that ends above the old
mill, the water of which can be used to run the water wheel on occasion
by being diverted to a wooden sluiceway, instead of taking its natural
course down over rocks into the seining pool. This second stream cannot
be traveled by fish going up to spawn although they can go down it on
their return journey.
One weekend I watched the fish at the top of the ladder as they jumped
over the board dam, to meet at last the quiet stretch of pond water
above it. The waters were growing green with algae as the season
developed, and were penetrated by deep shadows, blue shafts from the
sun, yellow and pink reflections from the spring leaves on the bank.
Some were unable to make it and slipped back into the rushing, narrow
flow in the ladder, and then tried again. Jumping the dam, they would
give a final, vibrant, struggling push into the smooth, heavy weight
of water over the rim and then shoot off, wriggling away, easing into
a new peace. The impetus of this leap was enough to send some of them
skittering along the flat surface on their sides, like skimmed stones.
Others going into the pond would start back again toward the head of
the ladder, and then return and wait a while as if they wanted company.
As some new arrivals came they would swim a kind of half circle in
relation to them, and then all would go on, having established a
communication; but the general movement was a bolt into deeper water
and then a rejoining into groups as they went on. After that, where do
they go?
As far as fish migration in general is concerned the spawning route
beyond Stony Brook is not very great. Roughly, the distance from the
outlet through Lower Mill Pond and Upper Mill Pond to the end of
Walker’s Pond is about two and a quarter miles. Upper Mill is the
largest of these, being about one and a half miles long and a quarter
mile wide. Where the fish spawn in this area is not too easy to find
out at first. Their preference as to spawning grounds seems to lie
along stony, pebbly shores, or shallow beaches. Many of them, before
spawning, will travel to the farthest reaches of any given water route.
Others, depending perhaps on how far the season is advanced and on
their bodily development, will either go the entire distance and then
return part way, or spawn before they get there.
It may be that the earliest, coming in during the month of March, or
early April, when the pond waters are still cold, will go farther
than the later arrivals. Their eggs develop more rapidly as the
temperature of the water advances, from around the late forties say,
at the beginning of the season, to a maximum of 72 or 74 degrees. When
the spawn is not ready they may keep going, schooling, roaming in the
ponds for days. But there are no hard-and-fast rules about which of the
alewife schools goes where, and any generalizations would have to be
varied to suit conditions in other localities where they are found. At
one extreme they may travel for six or eight miles up a tidal river,
or at another they may come into a pond connected with salt water by a
waterway or cut only a few feet long.
Many of them swim up headwaters as far as they can go, through the last
ditch to its stagnant end. I have heard of their going through marshy
land in the direction of Pine Pond, a small pond beyond Walker’s,
once connected with it I believe. There were cranberry bogs in this
land, bordered by wire fences. The alewives would slip sideways under
the wire so as to get to the other side. This is characteristic of
them. When in very shallow water, inches deep, hardly enough for their
bodies, they will skitter on, almost flat on their sides at times,
going as far as they can until the water gets deeper.
Occasionally they have been known, on their way upstream, to butt their
heads against a leaky dam where the flow of the water continued to come
rather than go up a fishway to which it had been rerouted. (In one case
an old log dam obstructing a stream had enough leaky cracks in it so
that fish slithered through them.) Such behavior may not make sense
from our point of view, but it is part of a life necessity to them.
Returning alewives are not concerned that we bypass a stream or send it
off its course. They continue to follow the direction and limits of the
flow that is in them, even as it might have been before we came.
Behind their persistence, if one term can encompass enough, is
the “homing instinct.” This is not only a matter of reacting to
environmental waters, but insisting on that area where they were
spawned, and where they grew, in the first few weeks or months before
they migrated to salt water. In trying to rehabilitate the alewife
population, men in fishery management are greatly helped by this
powerful drive to return. Sometimes they are hindered by it.
There have been some areas in which the construction of dams across a
stream or river has almost destroyed an old run, although there were a
few fish left over, making a yearly, token migration. They continued to
come in and spawn below the last, impassable obstruction in their way;
but when the dams were abandoned and removed and new fishways built so
that they could travel upstream to the headwaters, the alewives stayed
where they were. They did not migrate beyond their original limit, and
the population failed to increase. It was as if there were an invisible
wall in the water where the last, accustomed barrier had stood. Not
until the headwaters above were newly stocked with spawning fish was
there any chance of the run being fully used.
This built-in reaction to home waters might go back for thousands
of years in an unobstructed stream, or, in a new run, only three or
four. It has its limits, and its wisdom. What can go farther back, or
forward, than its own birth?
When I started watching the alewives I heard of one phenomenon that
seemed to me to surpass all analysis. It tempted me to look for magic.
The run that comes up from Nantucket Sound on the south side of the
Cape by way of the Herring River goes through a pond called Hinckley’s,
then through a stream ending in a fairly large body of water called
Long Pond. The migrating alewives are also able to go into another pond
out of Hinckley’s--north of it, and east of Long Pond--called Seymour
Pond, but the majority seem to spawn in Long Pond, from which there is
only one clear exit. The fish must go back to Hinckley’s, the way they
came. But this outlet was not always the same. Early in the nineteenth
century the natural outlet was a brook going into Seymour Pond, but it
was blocked and banked off by the construction of some cranberry bogs,
and the present outlet was dug some five hundred yards away. Now the
extraordinary thing is that on their return, the alewives still school
in the banked-up area of the old outlet. I went over there and could
find nothing to distinguish it from the rest of the sandy, water-lapped
shore, except that there was a slightly boggy area on the other side of
the road where the brook used to run, and a trace of its route through
the underbrush.
Was there any reason at all why these fish should be able to detect
an old route cut off a hundred years ago? The direction of its flow
no longer existed as currents in the water. Yet the “damfool herrin’”
were certainly behaving according to report. I could see them, a school
of several hundred, running freely along the shore, slipping lightly
over the sand through the unruffled pond waters. When they reached the
area of the old outlet they began an almost puzzled circling, which
continued for some time before they swung back again. There should have
been a common-sense reason for it, but I was tempted to ask, “What is
verifiable truth?” and not stay for an answer.
This story does not end in mysticism. It was suggested to me that there
was a certain amount of seepage at the outlet, probably going under
the bank and road, which the alewives felt and to which they reacted.
I can only say that all has not been told about their sensitivity and
perceptiveness ... transmitted from generation to generation through
thousands of years. I was quite sure at least that they knew more about
Long Pond than I.
Even if all the long-range problems about their movements cannot be
fathomed, there are enough local ones to keep a searcher busy. Given
enough persistence of one’s own, they may all be solved; helped of
course by the consistent fish. As the weeks went by I learned about
most of the local areas where they spawned. I had noticed a school
running offshore in the Upper Mill Pond, although I had not seen them
in the act of spawning. But there was one place where I had seen them
without knowing why. A few miles west of Stony Brook the fish come into
the tidal inlet known as Quivett Creek, where they appear to reach a
dead-end stretch of marsh ditched for mosquito control. I had tramped
around in this boggy region, seen a few alewives there, and come to
the quick conclusion that this was where they spawned. No one of whom
I inquired in the vicinity could tell me otherwise. I did not know
whether it was logical or not. They were not inclined, apparently, to
spawn in the full ebb and flood of the tides, but looked instead for
quiet waters. On the other hand, I had a pamphlet from the Fisheries
Research Board of Canada which said, about alewives: “... in the
Miramichi and other river systems extensive spawning takes place in the
swift waters of the main tributaries.” This was not swift water but it
drained and flooded daily. However, the fish did not seem to stay long
in the ditches, for whatever reason. It was hard to believe that they
would return to the Bay so quickly, when they had come to spawn.
Being puzzled about it, I went back some days later. I walked again
through the marsh at low tide when the ground was firmer, and finally I
saw where the main flow narrowed into one of the ditches, then ran into
a very small, almost imperceptible culvert that went under the highway,
Route 6 A. Sure enough, on the other side of the road, in a ditched
area tangled with briars, I could see many fish, slowly crowding
on--but this was not the end of it either.
Beyond was an impenetrable tangle of woods and thickets and an old
abandoned house, reproachfully dying, with large empty eyes where the
windows were, tall, unpainted, with dark-brown clapboards, and broken
inside. You could reach this house from a side road off the highway.
To one side of it was a small pond, which I had caught a glimpse of
before, covered with water lilies in the summertime. I went in over a
long high bank, part of an old road, that ran back of the house between
the tangled ditches and the pond. There seemed to be no access from one
side to the other; but toward the middle, on the side of the bank where
the ditches ended, I saw a few alewives circling in a pool of still
water. Then I heard a light splashing on the other side. I walked over
through the thickets and saw a number of fish wiggling and thrashing up
and over a little neck of water that ran out of the pond.
On one side this action, and on the other an apparently aimless moving
through rocks and sodden branches in the water. Undoubtedly there was
an old, hidden culvert that ran under the bank, but the underground
passage must have been partly clogged and certainly very small. So
the alewives that came into Quivett Creek spawned in that pond. Most
of them had probably been hatched there. The flow from the sea had a
logical termination. What else, the fish might ask me, had I expected?
XIV
Spawning: the Dance
During the third week in May, when the run seemed about over I had
still not seen them spawning, although I had heard a description of it
from my local authority, Mr. Alexander.
“A kind of swish dance is what they do,” said he, giving a hula-hula
motion with his hands.
Harry also described them as sidling up at the shallow edges of the
ponds, rocking as you would rock a baby; and then shooting out the
spawn, their fins lifting up with the effort. The pond suckers, as he
related it, would swim up to grab the eggs almost as soon as they came
out of their bellies.
What about that school I had seen running along the shore of the Upper
Mill Pond?
“Well, they were kind of getting acquainted, you know. Just cuddling
together!”
This was on May 25, as I have it in my notes, and when I started out
from the Herring Run to walk up to the ponds above it, Salvadore was
still there with his truck, barrels, and net; but he said he was going
to quit soon and deal in some redfish (another name for rosefish,
or ocean perch). The redfish made tougher, better bait for lobsters
anyway. While he had been in Brewster he had netted forty barrels a day
on the average, sometimes as many as eighty, but he told me that he
had not yet reached the four-hundred mark. One barrel, weighing some
two hundred pounds, might contain around three hundred fish or more,
so that about 120,000 alewives might be pulled out of Stony Brook in a
season, though I imagine this is a very low estimate. I have heard it
said that there are a potential two thousand barrels in the Brewster
run during the full season, taking all fish. In an abundant year
there might be close to six or seven hundred thousand adult alewives
migrating up the brook. Even so, subtracting the mortality, the
necessary minimum of fish allowed through the gate during the week have
a very heavy job to do to assure the return of hundreds of thousands of
their race in three and four years’ time.
Because of some kind of alewife caution or deliberation, not enough of
them were going into the seining pool to make a good haul. They were
delaying on the down side of the road. Salvadore waded in with his
rubber boots on to drive them under and through the bridge, but they
hardly budged, so he crouched down with little more than three feet
of height for body room, and swashed in after them. They skittered
before him, landing with a simultaneous series of quick dashes into the
pool.
It was a warm day. There was a new lassitude in the air, and the sweet
smell of lilacs. The gulls were gone that had flocked in quarreling
and screaming when the run was heaviest, hovering and rising over the
waters and their hordes of fish, bold enough sometimes to perch on the
bridge over the run, looking very large, with their pale-yellow eyes
glaring as naked as stone.
Once I saw a herring gull display its fantastic eating capacity by
dropping down into the fish ladder, grabbing an alewife, and swallowing
it whole. Down went the fat, foot-long fish in a few gulps, headfirst
so that neither scales nor sawbelly would stop the progress. Then the
loaded gull flew very heavily away as I came up, the alewife’s tail
having barely disappeared.
Now, in place of gulls, there were a few dove-gray, black and white
quawks perched on the outer branches of overhanging trees like heavy
sculptured ornaments, or standing in the water with their spear-head
bills ready poised for a frog or small fish. I have heard it said,
incidentally, that these night herons keep the gulls away. I have never
witnessed any aggressive action between the two races. On the whole
they seem to respect each other’s territory and to keep their distance
from each other; but I have seen quawks and gulls together waiting for
little alewives on the flats beyond Paine’s Creek.
In the brook there were still some fish ascending, but many more were
going back. It is a little hard to tell the difference at first, since
both face up against the current, but the returning alewives gradually
drop back, and many of them have the characteristic white marks on them
of fresh-water fungus infection. The strain of spawning and using up
their store of fat makes them thin, slow, and weary. They have lost a
good deal of their vigor, though not to the extent of preventing the
return journey.
In spite of this “spring fever” day it was not that the greatness of
events was over ... only the first great toppling of a wave, only the
first violent forwardness with its illimitable sounds and changes.
There was a steadier greenness on the trees, and blossoms on the
high lilacs. The run waters went on with a constant wail and wah, if
without the turbulence of a few weeks earlier. I left the Herring Run
and walked up into the warm pine woods to try and find the culminative
point of the migration.
A light wind was running straight down the long surfaces of the
Upper Mill Pond when I reached it, and little waves scudded ahead. I
walked on the north side where sandy banks descended to the shore,
shaded by pitch pines and covered with viburnum bushes and bearberry,
a pink-blossomed, shiny-leaved ground cover locally known as “hog
cranberry.” There were stretches of amber sand, small stones, or
gravel, along the pond’s edge. A fat sucker jumped for a fly and
crashed heavily back into the water.
All at once I heard a light thrashing and noticed a large water
snake under a blueberry bush. It had dropped a small salamander that
was twisting over and over on the ground, its damp body collecting
bits and shreds of dry leaves. As I came up, the snake hung over a
low-lying branch and watched me, its mouth slightly open with a little
toothed white and pink jawline showing. I picked up the salamander and
dropped it into the pond, where it hesitated for a few seconds and
then wiggled away into a patch of green ooze and deeper water. With a
stick, I tossed the snake twenty feet away, thus establishing myself as
universal arbitrator.
As I walked and watched along the shore I saw one group of alewives,
and then another, running by, looking light-colored and bright in the
sunny water. Sometimes these groups seemed to be made up of one female
escorted by several males, but the closer they came to shore the more
intermingled they were, and it was not clear to me that this was a
definite pattern. When she is running upstream, the female’s eggs
are unripe, but ripen soon after arrival in the ponds, provided the
water temperature is high enough--between 55 and 60 degrees may be the
average spawning temperature during the big April and early May runs.
As to the act of spawning, the female, depending on her size, deposits
anywhere between sixty thousand and a hundred thousand eggs (each some
0.05 inches in diameter) in shallow places; and because they are
sticky they adhere to gravel, sticks, stones, or whatever they settle
on. The males, who have been following the females closely, immediately
cover the eggs with milt, thrashing and scattering it with their tails.
The eggs hatch out in some six days’ time when the water is at 60
degrees, and in three days or less at 72.
When I first watched them spawn I saw a group of alewives run, circle,
and weave offshore, sometimes slowing up at deeper holes on the bottom,
or behind rock-protected water, and then come in close, with one quick
impulse. They raced in together to the gravelly, shallow edge, through
water not much more than ankle deep, with a sinewy, rippling motion.
Then in the shadows under an overhanging shrub there was a flipping,
whirling, and thrashing, a breaking of the surface. The female slapped
up against the side of a rock with a rising, shuddering motion of the
body as though it were shaking everything out of it, while the others
simultaneously writhed, coiled, thrashed tails, and shimmered through.
Then it seemed to me that there were a few seconds in which they slowly
reassembled their senses to go elsewhere. The word “deposit” was hardly
active enough.
A fat pond sucker was hanging around the center of activity, following
the alewives slowly like a small sunken log. It was obvious that eggs,
to this crude, crass, lazy taster of a fish, were the ultimate delicacy.
There were other occasions when the alewives, in greater numbers,
swam next to the shore, spawning in what might have been concentric
groups for several hundred yards. Some at the edge would be coiling
and thrashing while others swam on or circled back. The fish that were
farther out in the pond ran nervously, with eager movements, making
quick turns as if reconnoitering, or practicing for a culminating
turn. They collected suddenly when spawning, with quick, spontaneous
decision. I noticed that the males while running in would often
shoulder or press the females on. The characteristic thrashing whirl
they make is sudden and amazing, almost like a pinwheel in a short
burst.
Their attendants, the pond suckers, would loll in the slow rock of the
pond waters. They are large, soft-looking fish, with round, pink fins,
and white, fleshy lower lips with which they go nibbling and nuzzling
with snail-like speed over the bottom. The alewives by contrast are
small, gray, and quick. If alewife eggs are deposited between rocks the
suckers go down in after them, and, if the water is shallow enough,
present the odd picture of a large topheavy body sticking down with its
tail above the surface.
It is not I think, incongruous to apply the word love to a cold-blooded
fish. In this spawning act there is an imperative rhythm, with grace in
its preparation and power in its fulfillment.
Sometimes the war cry of gulls, in small flocks settling on the shore
waters or rising up, told me where the alewives were, but most of the
time I found them in accustomed places like that stretch of shore on
the Upper Mill Pond. Sometimes I could hear them splashing before I saw
them. They seemed to be more inclined to spawn when the water was not
too rough. On the other hand, I watched them spawning when the ponds
were very choppy and the small waves were pushing them as they thrashed
at the edge. Once, on the south side of the pond, I noticed the suckers
before the alewives. There were twenty or more lined up as if they were
giving the bottom a slow going over. When groups of alewives ran in and
characteristically heaved, flipped, and writhed at the edge, the big
suckers would move up closer. They were so oblivious to anything but
their slow gluttony that I could tap them on the head with a stick.
Occasionally a couple of alewives would give a sucker a little rush, a
brief chase, as much, so it looked, by way of sport as aggressiveness.
They were certainly incapable of damaging it very much, and it could
not be driven away for long. An overdose of suckers in any one area
seemed to discourage the alewives a little and make them move on, but
on the whole they too were so intent on what they were doing that they
hardly noticed anything else. They had to fulfill themselves; then,
stunned, go on. The eggs were expendable.
XV
The Return
After the first week in June there were very few if any alewives coming
up over the dam at the head of the run. An increasing number, on the
other hand, were going down, and I could find very few in the ponds. I
was to see them returning well on in July, which indicates that while
many, perhaps a majority, will leave the ponds a few days or a week
after spawning, others may stay there for weeks longer. For reasons
known only to the individual fish, occasional strays have been found
lingering in fresh water well into the winter.
On the morning of June 10, after a lapse of a few days in which I
had seen only a few returning, a boy who was weekending on the Upper
Mill Pond told me he had seen thousands go by in the direction of the
Herring Run. So they were still schooling for the return to salt water,
progressing again by accumulative motion. In a few weeks some of the
little ones, hatched out earlier, would start down too.
I stood on a rock and looked down into the water along that peaceful
stretch above the dam. This is an area where Indians gathered and
camped when the alewives were running, spearing them, or taking them
with nets made out of reeds. Many Indian artifacts have been found on
the surrounding slopes. On this June day insects were settling down
on the still surface. A shower was due--the air heavy. An alewife
slanted slowly up to the surface and then dropped down again. It left
a perfect circle behind it that gently widened over the blended images
of clouds, leaves, and rocks. Then as other small circles, raindrops
falling, began to show on the water, a belt of flying herons passed in
reflection. A breeze corrugated the surface slightly and the fish swam
slowly on toward the roar of the seaward-casting falls.
The returning migrants now have a choice between two outlets: one at
the top of the fish ladder, and the other at a board dam where the
water drops into a long pool above the old mill. At the far end of the
pool the waters fall again a short but precipitous distance, often
roaring full and hard down the rocky slope into the seining pool.
The alewives use both outlets, but the majority seem to prefer the
falling second stream to the ladder by which they came up, perhaps
because it is the point of greatest flow. Where they drop down over
the falls it looks to the proportionate, or disproportionate, senses
of a human being almost suicidal. Most go over tail first. Then they
appear to be dashed headlong down the jagged incline that ends in rocky
narrows going off at an angle to the pool. One after another they
flip and fall, their bodies bent like bows, and flash finally, swift
and vibrant--not, surprisingly, having been broken to pieces--at the
bottom. Occasionally a fish near the end of the slope will frantically
try to skitter back up. Presumably it is trying to reduce the speed
at which the ground is going by it, in the way a man tries to brake
himself when running downhill. But this almost helter-skelter falling
reveals almost as much of the alewife’s supple strength as its leaping
up against the current.
As June went on and polliwogs turned to frogs, the leaves came fully
out, clover and buttercups were blooming, and the pond algae had
increased at a fast rate so that a thick green scum gathered behind the
dam, and the pond waters were yellow-green. Still you could see the
fish gathering at intervals massed sometimes fifty feet or more behind
the two outlets. There is a small wooden footbridge over the board dam
at the head of the pool. When I lay down on the bridge and looked under
at the curved lip of the water I could see the fish gathering behind.
Against the steady rush and whine I could hear a dull, deep change in
sound as the fish suddenly turned and plummeted over. Their bodies,
enlarged behind a green curve of water, had a metallic sheen, a dull
silver, as they would wheel in, loom up, and drop away. I came back at
night, and could still hear that heavy sound in this lens, or gong, of
water.
In each new phase of migrant action there is an old ceremony. The
alewives approach the dam, in groups of varying sizes. They circle,
withdraw, and swim back again. Some of them swim between the two
outlets as if to decide which one to take. Coming closer, they show
an increasing animation, a quicker circling and flipping, as if the
outward pull of the water resulted in a more vital excitement between
them. After many more starts and withdrawals, lasting anywhere from
fifteen minutes to an hour or more from the approach of a given group,
or school--using that term in the sense of larger numbers--one or more
fish will drop over, and then the rest will follow.
I watched one school making these ceremonious retreats and approaches
for two hours. When they finally started dropping over I counted some
fifty fish a minute for about fifty-five minutes, until there were only
three left. This remaining three must have lacked the common stimulus
to go, the rhythm of sufficient numbers, and they stayed behind, as
more fish began to draw in closer from the pond. I have seen this
often. Sometimes seven, nine, and up makes enough of a group to start
over on its own; very occasionally one alewife will go it alone; but it
does seem as if a certain variable minimum will not take the move upon
itself.
Though a single fish may be the first to go over, or to advance
upstream, it is hard, from my observation, to attribute any leadership
to individuals, male or female. The crowd provides its own pressure
and momentum. Perhaps the circling of these groups and schools, and
their dropping over, might be analogous, though it is a looser motion,
to a flock of sandpipers flying off simultaneously as if they were
cast out by a lithe, invisible wire, and then turning on an instant,
glinting in the sun. The impulse is in the rhythmic unity of the group,
even though in the case of the fish some may be left off or behind
until they are rejoined in it.
The speed at which they drop over seems to depend on the size and
pressure of the oncoming school--population pressure, in other words,
unless pressure of numbers is a better term, which must also affect
the timing of their entry from the sea. Sometimes they go over:
one--two--three--four--one a second; but if the group is small the rate
may be ten to twenty a minute. Finally there are those few fish left
behind that circle around at the outlet or turn back into deeper water
where another school will be coming up.
All morning, as the alewives massed, circled, and dropped, there was
one fish that kept wandering through and over the others in a puzzling
way. It was a conspicuously darker color, which is characteristic
of blindness, as I learned later on. Its loss of sight, then, had
deprived it to some degree of the community action, though it had been
able to feel its way toward the outlet. Occasionally one that looked
exceptionally tired and slow would drop over the falls by itself. I
noticed also that those which were scarred and infected seemed to have
lost some of the fire of communication.
To the casual eye the spent fish may not look any thinner or weaker
than the rest, though when they hit the seining pool they are obviously
in no hurry to move on, but circle slowly around it for some time.
Their flesh, for the human carnivore, is of poorer quality than when
they came in from salt water. Going back to history again, it seems
that the recipients of alewives in the Caribbeans were not always
pleased with the product. There were complaints in the eighteenth
century, as I have indicated, and in the early nineteenth as well,
when plantation owners in the West Indies objected that this food was
doing bad things to their slaves. They said that alewives taken when
they were going downriver after spawning were “poison fish,” and “the
very worst food that can be given to slaves, as it both disheartens
them, keeps them continually murmuring, and brings on those scorbutic
diseases so common among negroes in that climate.”
Bad food or not, they were in all things directional, with the water
and the season, moving on and out, taking the rhythms of perpetuation
with them, these “reflex machines,” bearers of strong tides. They had
been giving me something of a lesson in cosmic weather, though I was
still a hopeless beginner. From one place, one road, around one circle,
they had led me through so much variety that I was left to wonder at
my omissions. The man-made world must still have far to go to learn its
inner and outer relations to a greater, expanding world of lives that
are given, not made.
What further connections are there, say, between the sun and sight,
between our tactile senses and the medium of earth and air in which
we are born, between the moon and the tides and the rhythms of water
and of blood? Who knows more about the universe--I with my conscious
measurements, my personal faltering, or the poor fish with its
unthinking precision through the various unknown? Can we not combine?
In any case, whatever human beings decide about what is effective or
ineffective, what shall stay or what shall go, the alewives know where
they live.
The crowd in the seining pool moved slowly, in a wide circle around
its rim. Most of their inland enemies had gone now. The human hunters
had driven away. The herring gulls had flown to other feeding grounds.
Not that one enemy or another made much difference to them, except in
terms of sudden fear. Like their eggs, they were expendable. Nature’s
ruthlessness, the using and the building up of that which fed and that
which was food, would keep them on the way of primordial energy. For
the same reason they were also spenders--one of the great sacrificial
coinages of the living world.
Still this point in their migration before the return to salt water
might be called a place of demobilization, a separation center. They
swam slowly around in the pool, passing between each other, but always
a part of the circle, each fish with its body and its large black
eyes leading forward, obedient to it. They dispersed very gradually
throughout the day. One small group after another broke off, sparks
from a wheel, and the fish let themselves be carried back down the
brook where the outlet of the pool led under the road. In the run
below where they went back step by step to the sea--whose pull was in
them--they faced up against the current, their orientation, with a
tired, slow weaving. I noticed a little perch attendant on them. It ran
down backward with the large procession, giving the alewives a look of
ceremonial grandeur. I have seen sunfish join up too, although there
could be a point on the approach to brackish water when they decide
that home life is better than parades. These motions must be catching,
communicating to other lives and races than those in which they
originate. All have their way stations, or orbits, along a route that
is being followed out with primal grace and power.
XVI
The Young Follow After
When the last adult alewife of the season drops down Stony Brook for
the tidal inlet and the sea, it has left the renewal of its continuity
and motion behind it. The little alewives follow out the route of their
elders with a silent animism, sent by ancient habit and unknown need.
The repetitive ways of the anadromous fish come out of geologic time.
On the long track since then, the adults, reaching their spawning
grounds, have had the drive of the sperm toward the egg. From the top
of a falls to the depth of the sea there are equivalent lifts and falls
in their own being. The young, tiny and perishable though they may be,
have the same inalienable motion in them.
After hatching, young alewives form dense schools, and begin to feed
on the plankton--tiny organisms and plant life--in the pond waters.
Occasionally they can be seen flipping on the surface. They are subject
to attack by all kinds of predators: perch, pickerel, frogs, herons,
kingfishers, water snakes, and many others, from the time they are out
of the egg. Landlocked waters are often stocked with spawning alewives
for that very reason. The fry make an excellent diet for such popular
game fish as bass, trout, and salmon.
The survivors begin to move out of the ponds about the beginning of
July. In other areas I have heard that the majority do not start
down until September. The first time I saw them was on the second
of July, when they were being drawn down by the thousands through
the dam opening at the head of the fishway. They were scarcely over
an inch long, and as they came in from the ponds they reflected the
summer-green of the water. Their eyes seemed huge in proportion to
the size of their bodies. They were poured down the boiling water
of the ladder, tossed around like chips and slivers, spilled down
helter-skelter; but where the current slowed, farther down the brook,
they held together in the fashion of their race.
There is an account, in a _Report of the Alewife Fisheries of
Massachusetts_, 1921, of some alewives hatched out in the
fisheries at Sandwich, Massachusetts, in June of 1919. The eggs were
put in water of 72 degrees Fahrenheit and half of the lot, in that warm
temperature, were hatched in only forty-eight hours. “In the surface
water were thousands of tiny alewives with food sacs nearly transparent
in appearance, and with tails resembling fine silk threads. The tiny
creatures, about one-fifth of an inch in length, wiggled through the
water with surprising activity. The eyes in both the egg and the
hatched fish were but faintly visible. At the end of ninety-six hours
their size had increased considerably, the outline of the yolk sac and
the body was plainly marked, and the eyes showed prominently. By this
time all the eggs had hatched. In cold water the period of development
is retarded proportionately to the lowering of the temperature.”
In a month the young alewives were about three-fifths of an inch long
and by autumn between two and four inches. At three-fifths of an inch
they look more like a sand eel than an alewife--an observation quoted
in the same report. When they are an inch and a fifth long they look
more like the adults. Their bodies are shorter at that size and they
have a large head and relatively large eyes. When they reach one and
two-fifths inches, about the size of those I saw, they look much the
same, but with the addition of the alewife’s sawbelly--“serrations of
the middle abdominal scales.”
It may be that in times past little alewives have been unable to
migrate out of the waters in which they were hatched, and local races
of a landlocked variety were established. The landlocked alewives
are much dwarfed in comparison with the salt-water variety. Some
years ago there were a number of complaints from householders in New
York City that small fish were coming out of the faucets. The Deputy
Commissioner of the Department of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity,
referred the matter to the New York Aquarium, which investigated and
found that these were none other than landlocked alewives: _Pomolobus
pseudoharengus_. They had been spawned in the Kensico Reservoir,
and in the autumn they passed through the 5/8-inch mesh of the screens
at the outlet. This might suggest the migrating habit of their ocean
cousins. A friend of mine, getting the parent stream theory turned
around, speculated as to whether a study might not show them returning
from the same faucets over a period of years!
But no conclusive evidence was found that these fish were following
out any consistent migration. For a period of eight years during the
course of the survey hardly any fish were reported as dropping into the
kitchen sinks of New York.
One interesting thing about the landlocked alewives is that they
are subject to mass mortalities, or “die offs,” for reasons yet
undecided. In some areas, like Cayuga Lake in New York State, this
happens occasionally, but in others, Lake Ontario, for example, fairly
regularly. This does not necessarily happen after spawning, so invites
no analogy to the west coast salmon. Many of the dead fish have not yet
reached sexual maturity.
As to the normal, coastal migration of the fry from fresh to salt
water, why do they leave when they do? Is there any theory that can
account for these little fish suddenly moving out of the waters in
which they were born, so rich with the fresh-water food that gave them
their initial growth? Are they fleeing their enemies? Yet the young of
the fresh-water fish are preyed upon too, and they stay behind.
There is an explanation about salmon fry which has them gradually going
seaward in order to escape the brighter light in the shallow fresh
waters; but is there anything in the constitution of an alewife that
is not accustomed to sunlit waters? They do not escape them so much
as seek them, because of their warmer temperature. Aside from that,
I would think, from my own observation, and the comments of others,
that they have no preference between the dark and light along their
way--they run through both--but do not like a sudden change. For
example, they waited all one morning before coming out of the shaded
waters under Stony Brook Road to go into the brightness of the seining
pool, only moving when a shadow fell across it that was cast by the old
mill.
If the adults swim toward the coast in the spring because of some
change in their make-up consonant with changes in the waters where they
swim, is there also some change in food and temperature which makes
the young start to leave fresh water at a particular time? The little
alewives are creatures of such sensitivity to their medium, to its
changes, and to what they eat, that a factor in the timing of their
migration might be some internal discomfort, or so it was suggested
to me. To begin to find out, a scientist would have to follow all the
stages of a little alewife’s birth and growth, tracing where it goes,
what it eats, and what the temperature, depth, and density of the
water is along the way. He would also have to do this for every age
group that leaves the three ponds from July through October, analyzed
pond by pond, since conditions differ in each one. During this period
the little fish leave at all stages in the seasonal development of
the ponds, while not all of one age group seem to go with the others.
Many appear to stay in the ponds for several months. So attempting
consistency with such findings might result in more indigestion for the
investigator than the fish themselves.
From the outward evidence all I can say is that these little ones do
not start schooling to move out of the ponds until they are over an
inch in length. I have seen them, still not much more than pin size,
circling a few hundred yards above the outlet, but neither swimming
with the flow nor letting themselves be drifted on. Logically then, the
point at which they are stimulated to leave must coincide with growth,
the rate of which depends on food and temperature in the ponds.
Warm-water ponds are more favorable to growth than cold-water ponds.
They turn out better fish, larger and healthier. By the same token a
cold spring and summer will result in a poorer crop of alewives. They
will probably be hatched later. The colder pond waters will bring
down the “plankton bloom,” in other words less food for the fish. As
a result, young alewives going to salt water that year will be
smaller, weaker, more subject to disease, and less able to escape their
enemies.
It is just possible, then, that some spring when the annual run of
alewives is smaller than usual, for no apparent reason, you might find
an answer to the mystery in a cold season, four years before.
After the first young alewives have moved out, having attained the size
and response necessary for it, you can see a gradual increase in size
from early summer until autumn. One of the unsolved questions is why
the earliest to go will not stay longer in the ponds. Why not relax, if
a fish can, and eat well until autumn, as in fact large numbers of them
do. Were they nearest the outlet? Perhaps the larger fish that begin to
appear later on were hatched earlier and therefore came from farther
back in the chain of ponds.
Of course there is nothing rigid about their timetable, nothing exact
about their migratory behavior. Whatever stimulates it, their new
momentum takes the form of a gradual circling out. I have heard that
in some areas they will start down and then return when they can swim
back up the outlet, if the force of the water is not too strong for
them. They may be in a state of indecisive action for a while, or so
it sounds, but most of them are moved to go at some time before winter
sets in, though there have been many exceptions to the rule. John
Burns, of the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, tells me
that he saw a “generous school of fry” one January, coming down under
the ice of a frozen pond at Bournedale.
Perhaps this phenomenon of migration in the young fish is not
susceptible of final analysis. Might that be because it is so simple,
however complex in detail and circumstance, simple though intangible in
the life rhythm it embodies? However slow or fast their response to it
may be, the little fish must be obeying an organic, directional drive
that goes back beyond history. As a part of their growing up they may
develop the same kind of built-in response to the waters in which they
find themselves as their parents schooling offshore in the spring; and
they come to have an intercommunication that knows its way. It is not
the adult call of sexual maturity that moves them, and yet they must
have a biological need to start out together on the same living track.
I recognize how much an amateur may leave out of his calculations, and
only proffer my individual guess that they follow the outward flow of
the ponds when they grow to feel a rhythmic, habitual motion in them
that responds to it and that belongs in its balance to the whole race
of alewives between land and sea. The fresh-water minnows stay where
they are, no matter how hard the pull of the waters may be. I have seen
them lazing in the shallows while a school of little alewives darted
over them, restlessly moving on. And as I followed the young migrants
I saw in them a roaming, roving sweep like sea birds made for distant
journeys.
I watched them coming down from July through October and into November,
from the lush green of early summer to the red and brown of dry weeks
in August, and on to the cool days of autumn when the sea turned a
brighter blue and winds and clouds blew full--all the way almost to
the hardening in of winter and its sullen skies. The alewife is a part
of the life of Stony Brook and the ponds above it for at least seven
months out of the year. And the fact that so many return again to the
particularity, the uniqueness of these waters is a reminder of the
power of living form and place together, the welding of those strands
of near and far in the body of a fish, the body of the world. The fish
egg rolls around on a greater axis than its own.
So the first of the tiny fish came down by the thousands during the
first week in July. After that there was hardly a day until the middle
of August when there were not at least a few to be seen in the brook.
Gradually they grew larger, so that in August they were up to two
inches on the average. The next big movement, after an August lull,
began on September 6 and 7. Their size by then had increased to between
two and two and one-half inches. A few were considerably larger. I
measured one at the surprising length of four and one-half inches, and
another, which escaped my net, looked to be well over five.
It was easy enough to get a sampling, because they had a tendency,
owing to their very light weight perhaps, to be caught at the bottom of
the little falls that poured out of each resting pool in the ladder.
They were tossed, turned, tumbled in the bubbling water, flung out from
it but returning to be tossed again. On the surface of that turbulence
they sometimes managed like gulls riding drafts of wind, but then they
would drop down and under and be carried off to the edge once more.
This would go on for a long time, although they were very gradually
dropping down the brook. Because of this tendency of theirs I was able
to scoop them out of the falls with a sieve--although the larger they
were the more elusive.
I noticed their absence during a number of cloudy and rainy days in
September and their return when the sun shone; which is not to say that
I did not see them on overcast days too, but the good days started them
going. They responded to warmth like the adults. Beginning in October
the next schools of fish coming down had increased in size, so that the
average seemed to have gone up to about two and three-quarters to three
inches. This movement, off and on, kept up until the end of the month.
I saw one last small group coming in to the upper falls on November 16.
In the larger individuals I noticed a wider radius of response, even
though they circled with fish much smaller than themselves. They were
faster. They were gaining more control, and more apparent ability to
see what was coming, my hand or sieve, for example, and to avoid it.
These later age groups were not tossed downstream so helplessly as the
earlier one-and-a-half-inchers had been. They showed more strength
against the current. Yet the motion of them all was consistent with
what I had seen in the adults going the same course.
I would see a little gray school of fish circling above the dam between
the two outlets, with a beautiful, light swinging, and running by.
There might be a sudden split in the middle of them when a leaf fell
or a dragonfly touched close to the surface of the water. Then one or
two of the tiny fish would fall back over the outlet with an almost
electric beat, while the rest stayed. Then four or five more dropped
over, and suddenly all the rest spilled over after them. They were
tumbled down the first steep ladder; then they followed out the longer
stretches farther on, sometimes running with the current, sometimes
turning back against it; and on the down side of the road they were
caught in the in-boiling waters of the second fishway, before the
uninterrupted flow ahead.
A minority came down the side or waste stream instead of swimming down
the second fishway, and, because they were not contained there as they
were in the resting pools, I could see more clearly what happened to
them as they approached a falls. The current was consistently smooth
and swift, but it was a long, level, calm stretch of water. I watched
them swimming straight down with it and then, quite close to the
sudden tug of the high falls, they would turn back. They felt it, and
had a quick response to it. It was as though they suddenly had their
equilibrium tested, and that they were like trapeze artists feeling
wrists, body, and rope, before swinging out and over.
Then down where Stony Brook was broad, shallow, and swift, they ran,
or were carried on, like sticks and leaves. Where the water lost some
of its force they swam up against it, in little schools together, or
they swam off to the side of the main flow for a while, sometimes
lingering in deeper water, or the shelter of rocks and banks, but
continually returning to it, always a part of that outward seagoing
rhythm. Gradually they traversed the swirling, eddying, long-stretching
waters. They moved toward the influence of the tides where the brook
ran through the marshes. They held position or circled back when the
brackish water came in against them. Finally they swam, or were pulled
out, from Paine’s Creek on an ebb tide, and moved toward the new
shelter of the sea and its many dangers.
XVII
The Power of Fragility
I think one of the greatest challenges is to watch each bounded living
thing with care for its particularity, as far as we can go, to find
out we can go no farther. Flower, fish or leaf, child or man--they
take none of our suggestions as to rules. Each has a strong language
that we never quite learn. No matter how many times I try to describe
the alewife by the uses of human speech, or classify its habits, its
intrinsic perfection resists me. It is _something else_. It goes
on defying my own inquiring sense of mystery.
The beauty of a little alewife held between the fingers, struggling
out of water, dying, by human arbitrary reach, becomes the subject of
thought and language, creative protestation in themselves. But the
two-inch creature makes a mightier protest than my conscious sight
of it ... wild, fragile, vibrant, shivering with a quickness that
will die out in a matter of seconds. It is a marvelously knit animal,
compact, flexible, shining, with its tiny meshed scales that interlock
the light, iridescent silver like the adults, green, yellow, purple,
receiving earth and sky. And the eyes, wholly black, interminably
deep. By a chance scoop of my hand it is out in the long killing air,
the little vibrancy out with the bird-gray clouds, a leashed arrow
straining for the stars, that have their running too in the circle of
immensity.
Fragile they are, and powerful, a wonderful work of which so many are
made as to afford them death as well as life. Let us say, arbitrarily,
that 150,000 female alewives lay their eggs in the ponds above Stony
Brook each year. After the pond suckers take their share and the
remaining eggs hatch out, then the young alewives run the gauntlet
of their first few days and weeks of life. The toll taken would seem
incredible if it were not also natural and expected. From billions the
young are reduced to millions.
If a run is to keep up over the years, there has to be an annual
survival, or “escapement,” of somewhere between 3 and 7 per cent. Say
a hundred million hatched, out of the original nine billion eggs. Five
per cent of that, or five million, have to reach salt water in order to
assure a normal spawning migration in three or four years’ time. From
that figure, of course, you subtract the alewife mortality during their
years of growth in the sea. I claim nothing for my calculations, but,
rough as they are, they may help to indicate how much potential goes
into the end result.
It is not only the alewives that are provided for by these great
numbers, but the predators which hunt them. The alewives are only part
of a great complex of need. Sometimes I have watched the fry as they
swam out across the Brewster flats on an ebb tide, running in shallow
water from the mouth of Paine’s Creek. In September, before they have
migrated south, crowds of terns, along with the resident herring gulls
and ring-billed gulls, would be hovering over the water and diving or
flocking in as the alewives appeared. I watched the constant, sinewy
beat of their wings as they held against a west wind. The sky was
swept way up with long cirrus clouds. The young alewives were running
into death and beyond it, in a windy world that teemed with risk and
creation.
A friend of mine, who worked in the vicinity some years ago, watched
the tiny fish coming down above the old mill one autumn day. He saw
some night herons standing in the lip of the dam gobbling the “poor
little devils” up as they went over. He was amazed at their stomach
capacity. Then he noticed that at the rocky falls where the pool ended
above the water wheel and seining pool only a few were dropping over
as compared to the thousands coming in from the pond, and the toll
the quawks took did not account for it. Somehow, somewhere, in this
short stretch of water, they were disappearing into a gulf, or, more
properly, a maw. It didn’t seem right. It made him angry, although:
“You can’t get mad at nature because that’s the way it is.” He got a
hook and line, baited it, threw it into the pool; and in two hours he
had fished out seventy-six eels.
These slithering, hoselike creatures are still there in season waiting
to prey on the fish. It does not take long as a rule to see one coming
up at the edge of the bank, though I have never seen them in any
great quantity, because they usually lie hidden in the muddy bottom.
Sometimes you can see a small group of eels of varying sizes in one
of the resting pools of the fishway below the road, where the little
alewives as they go down must almost fall into their mouths. With
broad-ribboned tails on one end of their long-finned bodies and pointed
snouts on the other, they weave and flip over, arch and float in the
water. Partly because of the narrow space, and their tendency to stay
or be caught in the turbulent pools, many of the little fish cannot
avoid being eaten. They have only the safety of numbers.
Having developed a certain affection for the race by this time, I must
say I had feelings of pity for these little ones, helplessly tossed
in and out of death. They _are_ fragile, like the young of other
animals. They will not last more than about three-quarters of a minute
out of water. But they are not ones to know or care whether I think
of them or not. They are parts of a great ordered hunger, and a vast
provision for things. They are both victims and executioners, the
feeders and the fed upon, in the intercommunication of every single
plant and animal in the natural world. There is nothing for affection
in that order perhaps, unless we conceive of it in terms of love as
well as annihilation.
I have followed them out and seen where their consistent motion, their
automatic reaction to the waters they swim in, has brought them to
grief. It serves for survival and also for disaster. When the young
alewives get out to salt water on an ebb tide, they are not able to
calculate how long it will last, or so we presume, and whether they
should move out soon or stay behind. The result is that many are left
stranded and wildly skittering in the rivulets that thread the sandy
flats at extreme low tide. From the time the outgoing waters of Paine’s
Creek begin to get low, they are also subject to attack by crowds of
herons and gulls--but supposing they survive that and still have a
chance in a matter of an hour or an hour and a half to reach deeper
water? It is very often the case that because of their habit of heading
back against the current they delay too long and lose their chance of
escape. They are caught high and dry on the sand or in water so shallow
that they are unable to move on, and so are easy prey for the birds. I
have followed them through low water and seen them turn back, just as
they had a chance to follow one waning current to join another and so
out to safety; but when I use the word safety I have to remind myself
that the flow goes where it will.
Now it is possible that you might interpret this behavior as a
reluctance to leave the inland waters. They have a drive in them to go
to salt water eventually, but they may be in no hurry. In some areas
they stay in estuaries or tributaries for a long time. At Paine’s Creek
and the channel above it they may have no alternative but to be carried
out on the ebb tide.
When they finally reach Cape Cod Bay they probably school in fairly
shallow shoal areas where the water is warmest, inviting bass or
bluefish of course, to “come and get it.”
“Shiners” some call them, confusing alewife fry with fresh-water
shiners, of which there are a great many species, but shine they do. In
the summer at low tide the bathers try to catch them with their hands,
or jump after them where they glitter in the pools. Sometimes there are
trails of the little fish left behind by those gluttons the gulls. In
death they look frail, limp, almost diaphanous. No longer so reflecting
and vibrant, their bodies are a pale silver-white like the underside
of fallen poplar leaves. Some of the heads are left uneaten along with
the headless bodies strewn in the rivulets along the ridged sands.
Sometimes their bodies are ripped down, gashed, leaving raw stripes on
them. These wounds look no less cruel and vivid because of their tiny
size.
XVIII
Going Out
The first alewife I saw in early spring was wild and new to me, feeling
its way upcurrent alone, cautiously, as if testing out an old trail.
Down Stony Brook there were long patterns in the water dappled like
fish scales. In the sky above there were cloud tosses and wind turns
during a break toward spring that the fish itself exemplified. Later
on the fry in the apparently indiscriminate times they moved out and
headed for salt water seemed to be pulled as if by moon tides and
turning earth. The course I followed was full of natural complexity.
Forms and patterns were endlessly co-ordinate and suggestive, but with
the mystery of their making, the universal power, at once ordered,
vast, fluid, out of reach.
The alewife migration taught me how to start. Had we been two and a
half miles up from salt water to the farthest pond, then back again, or
was it three thousand? I had learned that measurement was indefinite.
I still knew next to nothing about their lives in salt water. And
what was ahead on land? I could expect them to follow certain rules
of behavior. They would come back year after year unless the run was
so consistently overfished that the population dwindled. I knew where
to look for them now, and had some acquaintance with laws of supply
and demand, plus the effects of management or the lack of it. Perhaps
alewives could be expected in general to do what they had done before.
But those laws that lead all migrants on have more in store for us
than we can anticipate. The variations I had found in action and
circumstance, following those fish, variations like the changes of air
and water, leaves, grass and ground, intermoving light and shadow, were
unexpected and perpetual. If the alewives ever proved that anything was
static, it could only have been in me. There is no personifying the
unknown fish. I am not acquainted with it yet; but now we are on a run
together.
The alewife is another of the amplifications and extensions of life.
In the flip of its body, its communicable “Let’s go,” it offers to
be followed. So that race with its recoil and approach, approach
and recoil, circling in consonance with the forces of the earth has
the lesson of migration in ourselves. When I watched them coming in
on their old, persistent track and felt so much in my own senses of
that exploring, through the growing and falling off of leaves, the
wind charging and easing off, the bright waters, I knew there was an
infinite sum in me of the unused. What _is_ migration? Is it to
“pass from one place to another”--just that? And its causes may be the
need for food or to reproduce in season; but surely the term comprises
a great deal more.
Whether the migration of animals seems random, or with definite intent,
it leads across the earth. All the studies made of individual species
result in new directions to be explored, new unknowns about the
actions of other lives, and the ways they follow. The mystery about
the travels of birds, eels, monarch butterflies, or alewives, is not
only a matter of routes or seasonal behavior. It has to do with an
internal response to this spinning globe and its unendingly creative
energies. As a result of a respectful regard for other animals we may
find that we are being led onto traveled ways that were once invisible
to us, and in their deep alliance with natural forces we find a new
depth in ourselves. This is the common ground for all living things,
where migration has in it the blood of contact, the winds and waters of
communication.
On that July week when I first saw the young alewives coming down
through the outlet, the roads of Cape Cod were roaring and humming
with cars. The tourist season had suddenly come to its height. The
population of the Cape had jumped from 60,000 to 200,000 or more. There
were new demands, new pressures in the air. This was the yearly coming
on of an immense, expanding world, a migratory phenomenon in itself.
Voices and prices were rising. Man’s abundance vied with the natural
summer.
It was a hot day, though it had started out cool in the early morning,
with drifts of fog along the shore and patches of it through the inland
hollows. I had followed the alewife fry down from the Herring Run to
the shore road. They had become increasingly hard to find; but when I
reached the slow waters of the channel at Paine’s Creek I could see
multitudes of them heading in the direction of the Bay. Farther on
where the water ran out through the sands on the ebb tide there were
groups of them moving with it like little clouds.
There were a few people walking on the flats in the distance where
herring gulls were yelping and an occasional tern gave a light, harsh
cry. An old panting setter dog lunged aimlessly across the sands, then
splashed through the shallow waters of the creek at its outlet. On the
beach a family crowd of bathers were listening to a portable radio
that noised out the baseball scores. Some of them got up and saw to
their children, or fell, sat down, or dove into the water at the edge
of the sands. They sounded low, then high, like the gulls--“Stop it!”
“Come on!” “Here, bunny” “Come back here!” “Jump in”--full of alarm,
solicitude, friendliness, irritation, communality.
Back in the channel where the tiny fish, progeny of _Pomolobus
pseudoharengus_, were swimming on in the brown water, a couple of
growing, gawky children, a boy and a girl, half round, half lean, were
pushing each other down, floundering and thrashing, while they laughed
and threatened each other, completely oblivious of the great migration
a few yards away. Or can anything be oblivious? I felt that I had come
to the middle of things.
=Transcriber’s Notes=
New original cover art included with this eBook is granted to the
public domain.
Perceived typographical errors have been silently corrected.
Illustrations have been moved nearer to the text to which they refer.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE RUN ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may
do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
license, especially commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE
THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when
you share it without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work
on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method
you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has
agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right
of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.
The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.
This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
