Reminiscences of Glass-making

By Deming Jarves

Project Gutenberg's Reminiscences of Glass-making, by Deming Jarves

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org


Title: Reminiscences of Glass-making

Author: Deming Jarves

Release Date: November 25, 2013 [EBook #44284]

Language: English


*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK REMINISCENCES OF GLASS-MAKING ***




Produced by the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
generously made available by The Internet Archive)






Transcriber's Note: Minor typographical errors have been corrected
without note. Irregularities and inconsistencies in the text have
been retained as printed. Words printed in italics are noted with
underscores: _italics_.




REMINISCENCES OF GLASS-MAKING.


BY

DEMING JARVES.


SECOND EDITION, ENLARGED.


NEW YORK:
PUBLISHED BY HURD AND HOUGHTON,
401 BROADWAY, COR. WALKER STREET.
1865.


Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1865, by
DEMING JARVES,
in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of
Massachusetts.

RIVERSIDE, CAMBRIDGE:
PRINTED BY H. O. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY.




PREFACE.


The articles upon the history and progress of Glass Manufacture herein
presented to the public were originally published in the columns of a
village newspaper.

They are the result of investigation upon these topics made in the few
leisure moments gained from the engrossing cares of business, and
consequently make no pretension to anything of literary character or
execution.

The object of the writer has been to gather, in a condensed form,
whatever of interesting information could be gained from authentic
sources, in regard to a branch of manufacture which has attained a
position among the useful and elegant arts scarcely rivalled by any
other of those which mark and distinguish the progressive character of
our country.

It is believed that they present, in a condensed and convenient form,
much valuable information, useful alike for reference and instruction.
Aside from historical or mechanical facts, there is much of romantic
interest attaching to the progress of this department of art. The
partiality of friends interested in the topics herein presented, rather
than his own opinion of their value, has induced the writer to present
the articles in a more permanent form.

BOSTON, _March 17, 1854_.

                     *      *      *      *      *

The above was the Preface to a small pamphlet in 8vo. of the
"Reminiscences of Glass-making," printed for private circulation in
1854, and now enlarged into a more permanent form, and brought down to
the present year, in order to meet the demand for information which has
unexpectedly sprung up from those interested in the manufacture of
Glass in America.

BOSTON, _January, 1865_.




REMINISCENCES OF GLASS-MAKING.


It may be safely asserted that no department of art has, from its
earliest period, attracted so much attention and investigation, none
involved so extensive a range of inquiry, or been productive of more
ingenious, interesting, and beautiful results, than the manufacture of
glass.

The question of the origin of glass goes back to the remotest
antiquity, and is involved in almost entire obscurity. All that modern
writers on the subject are enabled to do, is to glean hints and
indistinct statements in reference to the subject, from the very brief
and unsatisfactory accounts of the ancients. These, however, throw but
a feeble light upon the precise point of the origin of the manufacture;
and little is proved beyond the fact of its great antiquity.

That the subject held a very prominent place in the technological
literature of the ancients is clearly proved; Pliny, Theophrastus,
Strabo, Petronius Arbiter, Berzelias, Neri, Merrit, Runket, and others,
referring constantly to it. The writings of all these demonstrate the
deep interest existing upon the subject at their various times, but
still fail to present us with any connected or detailed account of the
rise and progress of the art.

When it is considered that the elements involved in the manufacture of
glass are derived from the earth,--not one of its components being in
itself transparent, but earthy, opaque, and apparently incapable of
being transmuted into a transparent and brilliant substance,--when it
is considered that from these a material is produced almost rivalling
the diamond in lustre and refractive power, and sometimes so closely
resembling the richest gems as to detract from the value of the
costliest; can it be wonderful that in the earliest ages the art was
invested with a mysterious interest attaching to no other mechanical
department?

From the earliest periods, up to the eighteenth century, the art, from
the peculiar knowledge and skill involved, could only minister to the
wants or pleasures of the luxurious rich. The rarity of the material
rendered the articles greatly valuable, as tasteful ornaments of dress
or furniture; indeed, it is well known that the glass of Venice, at one
period, was as highly valued as is the plate of the present day; and
the passion for possessing specimens, promised in England, at least, to
excite a spirit of speculation fully rivalling that exhibited in the
tulip mania, so ridiculous, as well as ruinous, in Holland.

It has been reserved for the present age, however, to render the art of
glass-making tributary to the comfort of man,--to the improvement of
science,--and by its moderate cost to enable the poorest and humblest
to introduce the light and warmth of the sun within, while excluding
the storms and chilly blasts; to decorate his table with the useful,
and minister to his taste, at a cost barely more than that of one of
his ordinary days' labor. That which once was prized and displayed as
the treasure and inheritance of the wealthy, and which, with sacred
carefulness, was handed down as of precious value, may now be found in
the humblest dwellings, and is procured at a charge which makes the
account of the former costliness of glass to partake almost of the
character of the fabulous and visionary.

That the art of glass manufacture is destined to greater progress and
higher triumphs cannot for a moment be doubted; and the time will
arrive when, from increased purity of materials and progressive
chemical development, the present position of the art will fall
comparatively into the shade. It is no undue stretch of the imagination
to conceive that lenses shall be perfected whose purity will enable the
astronomer to penetrate the remotest region of space; new worlds may
perhaps be revealed, realizing all that the "moon hoax" promised--

    "The spacious firmament on high,
    With all the blue ethereal sky
    And spangled heavens"----

be read as a book, and man perhaps recognize man in other worlds than
his own. It may be that in its triumphs it is destined to concentrate
the rays of the sunlight, and make the eye to pierce into the secrets
and deep places of the sea,

    "Full many a fathom deep."

Man may be enabled to read the wonders and the hidden works of the
Almighty; it may be, that the power of the traditional lens of
Archimedes upon the fleet of Marcellus shall be realized, in the
absorbing and igniting, and perhaps useful power of some feature of its
progress; and in its sphere, the art become fruitful in practical
results, rivalling the highest attainments in the department of
scientific progress. It is no visionary speculation to believe, that,
by the aid of machinery, it may be readily rolled into sheets, as is
iron or lead now in use. It will minister more and more to the
necessities and comfort of mankind, and contribute largely to the many
and various manufacturing purposes of the age. That its practical
adaptations are not already known or exhausted, cannot be doubted; and
its applicability, in some cheaper form, for vessels of large size and
certain shape, and (strange as it may seem) for tessellated and ordinary
flooring and pavements, are among the results which we think yet to be
demonstrated in its progress.

An elegant writer, in a late number of "Harper's Magazine," says:--

"The importance of glass, and the infinite variety of objects to which
it is applicable, cannot be exaggerated; indeed, it would be extremely
difficult to enumerate its properties, or estimate adequately its
value. This, then, transparent substance, so light and fragile, is one
of the most essential ministers of science and philosophy, and enters
so minutely into the concerns of life that it has become indispensable
to the daily routine of our business, our wants, and our pleasures. It
admits the sun and excludes the wind, answering the double purpose of
transmitting light and preserving warmth; it carries the eye of the
astronomer to the remotest regions of space; through the lenses of the
microscope it develops new worlds of vitality, which, without its
help, must have been but imperfectly known; it renews the sight of the
old, and assists the curiosity of the young; it empowers the mariner to
descry distant ships, and trace far off shores; the watchman on the
cliff to detect the operations of hostile fleets and midnight
contrabandists, and the lounger in the opera to make the tour of the
circles from his stall; it preserves the light of the beacon from the
rush of the tempest, and softens the flame of the lamp upon our tables;
it supplies the revel with those charming vessels in whose bright
depths we enjoy the color as well as the flavor of our wine; it
protects the dial whose movements it reveals; it enables the student to
penetrate the wonders of nature, and the beauty to survey the marvels
of her person; it reflects, magnifies, and diminishes; as a medium of
light and observation its uses are without limit, and as an article of
mere embellishment, there is no form into which it may not be moulded,
or no object of luxury to which it may not be adapted."

In contrast with the foregoing, we will make one more extract, from an
English writer of ancient date. Holinshed, in his "Chronicles,"
published during the reign of Elizabeth, says:--

"It is a world to see in these our days, wherein gold and silver
aboundeth, that our gentility, as loathing these metals, (because of
the plenty,) do now generally choose rather the Venice Glasses, both
for our wine and beer, than any of these metals, or stone, wherein
before time we have been accustomed to drink; but such is the nature of
man generally, that it most coveteth things difficult to be attained;
and such is the estimation of this stuff, that many become rich only
with their new trade into Murana, (a town near to Venice,) from whence
the very best are daily to be had, and such as for beauty do well near
match the Crystal or the ancient Murrhina Vase, whereof now no man has
knowledge. And as this is seen in the gentility, so in the wealthy
commonality the like desire of glasses is not neglected, whereby the
gain gotten by their purchase is much more increased, to the benefit of
the merchant. The poorest endeavor to have glasses also if they may;
but as the Venetian is somewhat too dear for them, they content
themselves with such as are made at home of fern and burnt stone; but
in fine, all go one way, that is to the shades, at last."


PROPERTIES OF GLASS.

Glass has properties peculiarly its own; one of which is that it is of
no greater bulk when hot, or in the melted state, than when cold. Some
writers state that it is (contrary to the analogy of all other metals)
of greater bulk when cold than when hot.

It is transparent in itself; but the materials of which it is composed
are opaque. It is not malleable, but in ductility ranks next to gold.
Its flexibility, also, is so great that when hot it can be drawn out,
like elastic thread, miles in length, in a moment, and to a minuteness
equal to that of the silk-worm. Brittle, also, to a proverb, it is so
elastic that it can be blown to a gauze-like thinness, so as easily to
float upon the air. Its elasticity is also shown by the fact that a
globe, hermetically sealed, if dropped upon a polished anvil, will
recoil two thirds the distance of its fall, and remain entire until the
second or third rebound. (The force with which solid balls strike each
other may be estimated at ten, and the reaction, by reason of the
elastic property, at nine.) Vessels, called bursting-glasses, are made
of sufficient strength to be drawn about a floor; a bullet may be
dropped into one without fracture of the glass; even the stroke of a
mallet sufficiently heavy to drive a nail has failed to break such
glasses. In a word, ordinary blows fail to produce an impression upon
articles of this kind. If, however, a piece of flint, cornelian,
diamond, or other hard stone, fall into one of these glasses, or be
shaken therein a few moments, the vessel will fly into a myriad of
pieces.

Glass of the class called Prince Rupert Drops exhibits another striking
property. Let the small point be broken, and the whole flies with a
shock into powder. Writers have endeavored to solve the philosophy of
this phenomenon; some by attributing it to percussion putting in motion
some subtle fluid with which the essential substance of glass is
permeated, and thus the attraction of cohesion being overcome. Some
denominate the fluid electricity, and assert that it exists in glass in
great quantities, and is capable of breaking glass when well annealed.
These writers do not appear to have formed any conclusion satisfactory
to themselves, and fail to afford any well-defined solution to the
mystery.

Another phenomenon in connection with glass tubes is recorded in the
"Philosophical Transactions," No. 476:--

"Place a tube, say two feet long, before a fire, in a horizontal
position, having the position properly supported, say by putting in a
cork at each end supported by pins for an axis; the rod will acquire a
rotary motion round the axis, and also a progressive motion towards the
fire, even if the supporters are declined from the fire. When the
progressive motion of the tube towards the fire is stopped by any
obstacle, the rotation is still continued. When the tubes are placed in
nearly an upright position, leaning to the right hand, the motion will
be from east to west; but if they lean to the left hand, their motion
will be from west to east; and the nearer they are placed to an upright
position the less will be their motion either way. If the tubes be
placed on a sheet of glass, instead of moving towards the fire they
will move from it, and about the axis in a contrary direction from what
they did before; nay, they will recede from the fire, and move a little
upwards when the plane inclines towards the fire."

Glass is used for pendulums, as not being subject to affections from
heat or cold. It is, as is well known, a non-conductor. No metallic
condenser possesses an equal power with one of glass. In summer, when
moisture fails to collect on a metallic surface, open glass will gather
it on the exterior; the slightest breath of air evidently affecting the
glass with moisture. Dew will affect the surface of glass while
apparently uninfluential upon other surfaces.

The properties of so-called "musical glasses" are strikingly singular.
Glass bowls, partly filled with water, in various quantity, will, as is
well known, emit musical sounds, varying with the thickness of their
edges or lips. When rubbed, too, with a wet finger, gently, the water
in the glass is plainly seen to tremble and vibrate.

Bells manufactured of glass have been found the clearest and most
sonorous; the vibration of sound extending to a greater degree than in
metallic bells.

Glass resists the action of all acids except the "fluoric." It loses
nothing in weight by use or age. It is more capable than all other
substances of receiving the highest degree of polish. If melted seven
times over and properly cooled in the furnace, it will receive a polish
rivalling almost the diamond in brilliancy. It is capable of receiving
the richest colors procured from gold or other metallic coloring, and
will retain its original brilliancy of hue for ages. Medals, too,
embedded in glass, can be made to retain forever their original purity
and appearance.

Another singular property of glass is shown in the fact, that when the
furnace, as the workmen term it, is settled, the metal is perfectly
plain and clear; but if by accident the metal becomes too cool to work,
and the furnace heat required to be raised, the glass, which had before
remained in the open pots perfectly calm and plain, immediately becomes
agitated or boiling. The glass rises in a mass of spongy matter and
bubbles, and is rendered worthless. A change is however immediately
effected by throwing a tumbler of water upon the metal, when the
agitation immediately ceases, and the glass assumes its original quiet
and clearness.

All writers upon the subject of glass manufacture fail to show anything
decisive upon the precise period of its invention. Some suppose it to
have been invented before the flood. Nervi traces its antiquity to the
yet problematical time of Job.

It seems clear, however, that the art was known to the Egyptians
thirty-five hundred years since; for records handed down to us in the
form of paintings, hieroglyphics, &c., demonstrate its existence in the
reign of the first Osirtasen, and existing relics in glass, taken from
the ruins of Thebes, with hieroglyphical data, clearly place its
antiquity at a point fifteen centuries prior to the time of Christ.

Mr. Kennett Loftus, the first European who has visited the ancient
ruins of Warka, in Mesopotamia, writes thus: "Warka is no doubt the
Erech of Scripture, the second city of Nimrod, and it is the Orchoe of
the Chaldees. The mounds within the walls afford subjects of high
interest to the historian; they are filled, or I may say composed, of
coffins piled upon each other to the height of forty-five feet."

"The coffins are of baked clay, covered with green glaze, and embossed
with the figures of warriors, &c., and within are ornaments of gold,
silver, iron, copper, and _glass_."

Layard, in his discoveries among the ruins of Nineveh and Babylon, in
chapter 8th, says: "In this chamber were found two entire glass bowls,
with fragments of others. The glass, like all others that come from the
ruins, is covered with pearly scales, which, on being removed, leave
prismatic, opal-like colors of the greatest brilliancy, showing, under
different lights, the most varied tints. This is a well-known effect of
age arising from the decomposition of certain component parts of the
glass. These bowls are probably of the same period as the small bottle
found in the ruins of the northwest palace during the previous
excavations, and now in the British Museum. On this highly interesting
relic is the name of Sargon, with his title of King of Assyria, in
cuneiform characters, and the figure of a lion. We are therefore able
to fix its date to the latter part of the seventh century B.C. It is
consequently the most ancient known specimen of _transparent_ glass."

In chapters 22d and 25th, he gives us the form of many glass vessels
from the mound of Babel, similar in form to the modern fish-globes,
flower-vases and table water-bottles of the present day--the latter
being reeded must have been formed in metallic moulds--and pieces of
glass tubes, the exterior impression exactly like our modern patch
diamond figure.

Of the several specimens of glass brought to England by Mr. Layard,
one, the fragment of a vase, when examined, was of a dull green color,
as though incrusted with carbonate of copper. This color was quite
superficial, and the glass itself was opaque and of a vermilion tint,
attributed to suboxide of copper. The outer green covering was due to
the action of the atmosphere on the surface of the glass, and the
consequent change of the suboxide into green carbonate of copper. This
specimen is interesting, as showing the early use and knowledge of
suboxide of copper as a stain or coloring agent for glass. The ancients
employed several substances in their glass, and colored glazes for
bricks and pottery, but of which there remains no published record. But
these glasses and other ancient works of art prove that they were
familiar with the use of oxide of lead as a flux in their vitreous
glasses, and with stannic acid and Naples yellow as stains or pigments.

Other writers believe that glass was in more general use in the ancient
than in comparatively modern times, and affirm that among the Egyptians
it was used even as material for coffins. It is certainly true that so
well did the Egyptians understand the art, that they excelled in the
imitation of precious stones, and were well acquainted with the
metallic oxides used in coloring glass; and the specimens of their
skill, still preserved in the British Museum and in private
collections, prove the great skill and ingenuity of their workmen in
mosaic similar in appearance to the modern paper-weights. Among the
specimens of Egyptian glass still existing is a fragment representing a
lion in bas-relief, well executed and anatomically correct. Other
specimens are found inscribed with Arabic characters.

All writers agree that the glass-houses in Alexandria, in Egypt, were
highly celebrated for the ingenuity and skill of their workmen, and the
extent of their manufactures.

Strabo relates that the Emperor Hadrian received from an Egyptian
priest a number of glass cups in mosaic, sparkling with every color,
and deemed of such rare value that they were used only on great
festivals.

The tombs at Thebes, the ruins of Pompeii and Herculaneum, and the
remains of the villa of the Emperor Tiberius, go not only incidentally
to establish the antiquity of the art, but also prove the exquisite
taste and skill of the artists of their various periods.

The first glass-houses, well authenticated, were erected in the city of
Tyre. Modern writers upon the subject generally refer to Pliny in
establishing the fact that the Phoenicians were the inventors of the
art of glass-making. The tradition is that the art was originally
brought to light under the following circumstances. A vessel being
driven by a storm to take shelter at the mouth of the river Belus, the
crew were obliged to remain there some length of time. In the process
of cooking, a fire was made upon the ground, whereon was abundance of
the herb "kale." That plant burning to ashes, the saline properties
became incorporated with the sand. This causing vitrification, the
compound now called glass was the result. The fact becoming known, the
inhabitants of Tyre and Sidon essayed the work, and brought the new
invention into practical use. This is the tradition: but modern science
demonstrates the false philosophy, if not the incorrectness, of Pliny's
account; and modern manufacturers will readily detect the error, from
the impossibility of melting silex and soda by the heat necessary for
the ordinary boiling purposes.

It is a well-authenticated fact, however, that there were whole streets
in Tyre entirely occupied by glass-works; and history makes no mention
of any works of this character at an earlier period than the time
mentioned by Pliny.

That Tyre possessed peculiar advantages for the manufacture, is very
clear from geographical and geological data, the sand upon the shore at
the mouth of the river Belus being pure silica, and well adapted to the
manufacture. The extensive range of Tyrian commerce, too, gave ample
facilities for the exportation and sale of the staple; and for some
ages it must have constituted almost the only article, or at least the
prominent article, of trade. Doubtless the rich freights of "the ships
of Tyre," mentioned in Scripture, may in part have been composed of a
material now as common as any of its original elements.

From Tyre and Sidon the art was transferred to Rome. Pliny states it
flourished most extensively during the reign of Tiberius, entire
streets of the city being then occupied by the glass manufactories.
From the period of Tiberius the progress of the art seems more definite
and marked, both as relates to the quantity and mode of manufacture.

It was during the reign of Nero, so far as we can discover, that the
first perfectly clear glass, resembling crystal, was manufactured.
Pliny states that Nero, for two cups of ordinary size, with handles,
gave six thousand sestertia, equal in our currency to about two hundred
and fifty thousand dollars; and that rich articles of glass were in
such general use among the wealthy Romans as almost to supersede
articles of gold and silver. The art, however, at that period, seems to
have been entirely devoted to articles of luxury, and from the great
price paid, supported many establishments,--all however evidently upon
a comparatively small scale, and confined, as it would appear, to
families.

Up to this period, no evidence appears to prove that any other than
colored articles in glass-ware were made. It is clear, too, that the
furnaces and melting-pots then in use were of very limited capacity,
the latter being of crucible shape; and it was not until the time of
Nero that the discovery was made that muffled crucibles or pots, as at
the present day, were required in order to make crystal glass. (Without
them, it is well known, crystal glass cannot be perfected.) It appears,
further, that a definite street in the city of Rome was assigned to the
manufacturers of this article; and that in the reign of Severus they
had attained such a position, and accumulated wealth to such a degree,
that a formal tax was levied upon them. Some writers take the ground
that this assessment was the primary cause of the transfer of the
manufacture to other places.

That the peculiar property of the manufacture at this period was its
clear and crystal appearance is abundantly evident; and this, and the
great degree of perfection to which the manufacture of white or
crystal-like glass was carried, are by many writers thought to have
been proved from classical sources,--Horace and Virgil both referring
to it, the one speaking of its beautiful lustre and brilliancy, the
other comparing it to the clearness of the waters of the Fucine Lake.

The decline of this art in Rome is clearly defined by various writers;
and its gradual introduction into Bohemia and Venice is plainly marked
out. At this latter place the art flourished to a remarkable degree,
and being marked by constant progress and improvement, enabled Venice
to supply the world without a rival, and with the beautiful manufacture
called "Venice drinking-cups." The beauty and value of these are
abundantly testified to by many authors, among whom is Holinshed,
referred to previously. The manufacture of these and similar articles
were located, as stated in the "Chronicles," at Murano, a place about
one mile from the city, where the business was carried on, and assumed
a high position in the order of the arts. And from thence we are
enabled to date its future progress and gradual introduction into
Europe, Germany, England, and the Western World.

It is not strange that the strict secrecy with which the business was
conducted in these times, should have invested the art with an air of
romance; and legends, probably invented for the purpose, created a
maximum of wonder among the uninitiated. The government of Venice also
added, by its course, to the popular notions regarding the high mystery
of the art, conferring, as it did, the title of "Gentleman" (no idle
title in those days) on all who became accomplished in the manufacture.
Howell, in his "Familiar Letters," dated from Venice in 1621, says:
"Not without reason, it being a rare kind of knowledge and chemistry,
to transmute the dull bodies of dust and sand, for they are the only
ingredients, to such pellucid, dainty body, as we see crystal glass
is."

That the art had greatly improved in the hands of the Venetian artisans
cannot be doubted. The manufacture was carried to a degree far beyond
any previous period; and the more so, because sustained by the
governmental protection and patronage. Venice being then in the height
of her commercial glory, she herself being "Queen of the Sea," ample
facilities existed for the exportation of her manufactures to every
part of the known world; and for a long period she held the monopoly of
supplying the cities of Europe with crystal glass in its various
departments of ornament and utility.

A French writer, who published an elaborate work in twelve books upon
the subject of glass manufacture, after it had been introduced into
France, gives an interesting account of the rise and progress of the
art in that country, the encouragement it received, and the high
estimation in which it was held. After stating that it was introduced
into France from Venice, he says:--

"The workmen who are employed in this noble art are all gentlemen, for
they admit none but such. They have obtained many large privileges, the
principal whereof is to work themselves, without derogating from their
nobility. Those who obtained these privileges first were gentlemen by
birth; and their privilege running, that they may exercise this art
without derogating from their nobility, as a sufficient proof of it,
which has been confirmed by all our kings; and in all inquiries that
have been made into counterfeit nobilities, never was any one attainted
who enjoyed these privileges, having always maintained their honor down
to their posterity."

Baron Von Lowhen states, in his "Analysis of Nobility in its Origin,"
that, "So useful were the glass-makers at one period in Venice, and so
considerable the revenue accruing to the republic from their
manufacture, that, to encourage the men engaged in it to remain in
Murano, the Senate made them all Burgesses of Venice, and allowed
nobles to marry their daughters; whereas, if a nobleman marries the
daughter of any other tradesman, the issue is not reputed noble."

From this statement a valuable lesson can be drawn, viz., that a strict
parallel is constantly observable between the progress of this art and
the intellectual and social elevation of its possessors.

Those engaged in it now do not indeed occupy the same social position;
still it is probable that in foreign lands the blood of noble ancestors
still runs in their veins; and even in our own democratical land, with
all the tendencies of its institutions, workers in glass claim a
distinctive rank and character among the trades; and in the prices of
labor, and the estimate of the comparative skill involved, are not
controlled by those laws of labor and compensation which govern most
other mechanical professions; and similarity of taste and habit is in a
degree characteristic of the modern artisan in this department, as in
the case of those who, for their accomplishment in the art, were
ennobled in the more remote period of its progress. The same writer
says:--

"It must be owned those great and continual heats, which those
gentlemen are exposed to from their furnaces, are prejudicial to their
health; for, coming in at their mouths, it attacks their lungs and
dries them up, whence most part are pale and short-lived, by reason of
the diseases of the heart and breast, which the fire causes; which
makes Libarius say, 'they were of weak and infirm bodies, thirsty, and
easily made drunk,'--this writer says, this is their true character:
but I will say this in their favor, that this character is not general,
having known several without this fault."

Such was the character and habits of noble glass-makers four hundred
years since; and whether their descendants still retain their blood or
not, the habit of drinking, believed at that time necessary as
consequent upon the nature of the employment, is, at the present day,
confined to the ignorant, dissolute, and unambitious workmen. The habit
will, doubtless, ere long be done away. Still, so long as the workmen
of the present day cling to their conventional rules,--act as one body,
the lazy controlling the efforts of the more intelligent and
industrious,--so long will the conduct of the dissolute few affect the
moral reputation of the entire body. They must not forget the old
adage, that "One bad sheep taints the whole flock." The spirit of the
age in no degree tends to sustain the old saying, that "Live horses
must draw the dead ones."

The writer already referred to, dwelling with great interest upon the
social position of those then engaged in the art, goes on to say:--

"Anthony de Brossard, Lord of St. Martin and St. Brice, gentleman to
Charles d'Artois, Count of Eu, a prince of noble blood royal, finding
this art so considerable, that understanding it did not derogate from
their nobility, obtained a grant in the year 1453 to establish a
glass-house in his country, with prohibition of any other, and several
other privileges he had annexed to it. The family and extraction of
this Sieur de Brossard was considerable enough to bring him here as an
example. The right of making glass being so honorable, since the elder
sons of the family of Brossard left it off, the younger have taken it
up, and continue it to this day. Messieurs de Caqueray, also gentlemen
of ancient extraction, obtained a right of glass-making, which one of
their ancestors contracted by marriage in the year 1468 with a daughter
of Anthony de Brossard, Lord of St. Martin, that gentleman giving half
of his right for part of her fortune, which was afterwards confirmed in
the Chamber of Accounts. Messieurs Valliant, an ancient family of
gentlemen, also obtained a grant of a glass-house for recompense of
their services, and for arms a Poignard d'Or on azure, which agrees
with their name and tried valor. Besides these families, who still
continue to exercise this art, there are the Messieurs de Virgille, who
have a grant for a little glass-house. Messieurs de la Mairie, de
Suqrie, de Bougard, and several others, have been confirmed in their
nobility during the late search in the year 1667.

"We have, moreover, in France, several great families, sprung from
gentlemen glass-makers who have left the trade, among whom some have
been honored with the purple and the highest dignities and offices."

Enough is recorded to show in what estimation the art was held in
France by the government and people of that period; and it is in nowise
wonderful that an art invested with so much distinction, conducted with
so much secrecy, and characterized with so great a degree of romantic
interest, should have given rise to strange reports and legends,
hereafter to be referred to.

The writer referred to above states that there were two modes of
manufacturing glass. One he denominates that of the "Great
Glass-Houses," the other the "Small Glass-Houses." In the large houses
the manufacture of window-glass, and bottles for wine or other liquors,
was carried on. He states:--

"The gentlemen of the Great Glass-Houses work only twelve hours, but
that without resting, as in the little ones, and always standing and
naked. The work passes through three hands. First, the gentlemen
apprentices gather the glass and prepare the same. It is then handed to
the second gentlemen, who are more advanced in the art. Then the master
gentleman takes it, and makes it perfect by blowing it. In the little
glass-houses, where they make coach-glasses, drinking-glasses,
crystals, dishes, cups, bottles, and such like sort of vessels, the
gentlemen labor but six hours together, and then more come and take
their places, and after they have labored the same time they give
places to the first; and thus they work night and day, the same workmen
successively, as long as the furnace is in a good condition."

Every glass-maker will perceive, from the foregoing description, that
the same system prevails at the present time, as to the division of
labor and period of labor, so far at least as "blown articles" are
concerned. The names, too, then given to glass-makers' tools are
retained to the present day, and, with slight difference, the shapes of
the various tools are the same.

At the best, the manufacturers of glass in France were for a long
period much inferior to the Venetians and Bohemians; but after the
introduction of window-glass, from Venice, the making of crystal glass
greatly extended and correspondingly improved.

In the year 1665 the government of France, desirous of introducing the
manufacture of window-glass, offered sufficient inducement in money and
privileges to a number of French artists (who had acquired the process
at Murano, at Venice) to establish works at Tourtanville. At these
works the same system of blowing was followed as that used in the
Venetian glass-works. A workman, under this system, named Thevart,
discovered the art of casting plate-glass, and obtained from the
government a patent for the term of thirty years. He erected extensive
works in Paris, and succeeded in what was then deemed an extraordinary
feat, casting plates eighty-four inches by fifty inches, thereby
exciting unbounded admiration.

The credit of the invention of casting plates of glass belongs to
France, and the mode then adopted exists at the present day, with but
slight variation. France monopolized the manufacture over one hundred
years before it was introduced into any other country.

Writers generally agree that the manufacture of glass was introduced
into England in the year 1557. "Friars' Hall," as stated by one writer,
was converted into a manufactory of window-glass,--other writers say,
for crystal glass, (called by the English "flint," from the fact of the
use of flint-stones, which, by great labor, they burnt and ground.) In
1575 Friars' Hall Glass-Works, with forty thousand billets of wood,
were destroyed by fire.

In 1635, seventy-eight years after the art was introduced into England,
Sir Robert Mansell introduced the use of coal fuel instead of wood, and
obtained from the English government the monopoly of importing the fine
Venetian drinking-glasses, an evidence that the art in England was
confined as yet to the coarser articles. Indeed, it was not until the
reign of William III. that the art of making Venetian drinking-vessels
was brought into perfection,--quite a century after the art was
introduced into England; an evidence of the slow progress made by the
art in that country.

As France was indebted to Venice for her workmen, so also was England
indebted to the same source. Howell, in one of his "Familiar Letters,"
directed to Sir Robert Mansell, Vice-Admiral of England, says: "Soon as
I came to Venice, I applied myself to dispatch your business according
to instruction, and Mr. Seymour was ready to contribute his best
furtherance. These two Italians are the best gentlemen workmen that
ever blew crystal. One is allied to Antonio Miotte, the other is cousin
to Maralao."

Although Sir Robert procured workmen from Venice, they were probably of
an inferior character, and a space of fifty years elapsed before the
English manufactories equalled the Venetian and French in the quality
of their articles.

Evelyn, in his "Diary," states: "On the proclamation of James II., in
the market-place of Bromley, by the sheriff of Kent, the commander of
the Kentish troops, two of the King's trumpeters, and other officers,
drank the King's health in a flint wine-glass three feet tall."

In the year 1670, the Duke of Buckingham became the patron of the art
in England, and greatly improved the quality and style of the
flint-glass, by procuring, at great personal expense, a number of
Venetian artists, whom he persuaded to settle in London. From this
period, _i.e._, about the commencement of the eighteenth century,
the English glass manufactories, aided by the liberal bounties granted
them in cash upon all glass exported by them or sold for export, became
powerful and successful rivals of the Venetian and the French
manufactories in foreign markets. The clear bounty granted on each
pound of glass exported from England, which the government paid to the
manufacturer, was not derived from any tax by impost or excise
previously laid, for all such were returned to the manufacturer,
together with the bounty referred to; thereby lessening the actual cost
of the manufacture from twenty-five to fifty per cent., and enabling
the English exporters to drive off all competition in foreign markets.
This bounty provision was annulled during the Premiership of Sir Robert
Peel, together with all the excise duty on the home consumption.

In 1673 the first plate-glass was manufactured at Lambeth, under a
royal charter; but no great progress was made at that time, and the
works for the purpose were doubtless very limited. One hundred years
later, _i.e._ 1773, a Company was formed, under a royal charter,
called the "Governor and Company of the British Cast Plate-Glass
Manufactory," with a capital of eighty shares of five hundred pounds
each, their works being at Ravenshead, in Lancashire. These works have
been very successfully conducted, and, according to a late writer, are
rivalled by none, excepting those at "St. Gobain," in France. Since the
excise duty on plate-glass has been repealed, its manufacture has
increased to a wonderful extent; the quantity used in the construction
of the Crystal Palace, for the World's Fair, being probably many times
larger than that manufactured twenty years since in the kingdom of
Great Britain in any one year.

An English paper states that Roger Bacon, at sixty-four years of age,
was imprisoned ten years for making concave and convex glasses, and
camera-obscura and burning-glasses.

It is to many persons matter of great surprise that the manufacture of
plate-glass has never been introduced into this country. The whole
process is a simple one. The materials are as cheap here as in England
or in France. Machinery for the polishing of the surface is as easily
procured, and water-power quite as abundant, as in either country. The
manufacture, with the materials so ready to the hand, and these
together with the skill, labor, and demand, increasing every year, is
most certain to realize a fair remunerating profit and steady sale.
Besseman has lately introduced a new method of casting plate-glass,
which, should it equal the inventor's expectation, will reduce the
cost, supersede the old plan, and eventually, of course, increase the
consumption.


CURIOSITIES OF GLASS-MAKING.

We gather from the ancient writers on glass-making, that the workers in
the article had, at a very early period, arrived at so great a degree
of proficiency and skill as to more than rival, even before the period
of the Christian era, anything within the range of more modern art. The
numerous specimens of their workmanship, still preserved in the public
institutions of Europe, and in the cabinets of the curious, prove that
the art of combining, coloring, gilding, and engraving glass was
perfected by the ancients. Indeed, in fancy coloring, mosaic, and mock
gems or precious stones, the art of the ancients has never been
excelled. Among the numerous specimens it is remarkable that all
vessels are round; none of ancient date are yet found of any other
form. And no specimen of crystal glass of ancient date has yet been
found.

Among the numerous antiques yet preserved, the "Portland Vase" must
hold the first place. Pellat, in his work on the incrustation of glass,
states: "The most celebrated antique glass vase is that which was
during more than two centuries the principal ornament of the Barberini
Palace, and which is now known as the 'Portland Vase.' It was found
about the middle of the sixteenth century, enclosed in a marble
sarcophagus within a sepulchral chamber, under the Monte del Garno, two
and a half miles from Rome, in the road to Frascati. It is ornamented
with white opaque figures in bas-relief upon a dark blue transparent
ground. The subject has not heretofore received a satisfactory
elucidation, but the design and more especially the execution are
admirable. The whole of the blue ground, or at least the part below the
handles, must have originally been covered with white enamel, out of
which the figures have been sculptured in the style of a cameo, with
most astonishing skill and labor." The estimation in which the ancient
specimens of glass were held, is demonstrated by the fact that the
Duchess of Portland became the purchaser of the celebrated vase which
bears her name, at a price exceeding nine thousand dollars, and bore
away the prize from numerous competitors. The late Mr. Wedgwood was
permitted to take a mould from the vase, at a cost of twenty-five
hundred dollars, and he disposed of many copies, in his rich china, at
a price of two hundred and fifty dollars each.

The next specimen of importance is the vase exhumed at Pompeii in 1839,
which is now at the Museum at Naples. It is about twelve inches high,
eight inches in width, and of the same style of manufacture with the
"Portland Vase." It is covered with figures in bas-relief raised out of
a delicate white opaque glass, overlaying a transparent dark blue
ground, the figures being executed in the style of cameo engraving. To
effect this, the manufacturer must have possessed the art of coating a
body of transparent blue glass with an equal thickness of enamel or
opal-colored glass. The difficulty of tempering the two bodies of glass
with different specific gravities, in order that they may stand the
work of the sculptor, is well known by modern glass-makers. This
specimen is considered by some to be the work of Roman artists; by
others it is thought to be of the Grecian school. As a work of art it
ranks next to the "Portland Vase," and the figures and foliage, all
elegant and expressive, and representative of the season of harvest,
demonstrate most fully the great artistic merit of the designer.


THE ROYAL CLARENCE VASE.

William Hone, in his "Day-Book" for 1831, says, "This superb glass
vase, designed by John Gunby, and exhibited at the Queen's Bazaar,
Oxford Street, London, is an immense basin of copper, and its iron
shaft or foot clothed with two thousand four hundred pieces of glass,
construct a vase fourteen feet high and twelve feet wide across the
brim, weighing upwards of eight tons, and capable of holding eight
pipes of wine. Each piece of glass is richly cut with mathematical
precision and beautifully colored; the colors are gold, ruby, emerald,
&c.; the colored pieces being cemented upon the metal body and rendered
air-tight. The exterior is a gem-like surface of inconceivable
splendor; on a summer afternoon it forms a mass of brilliancy. The
vase, by illumination of gas alone, glittered like diamonds upon melted
gold. Mr. Reingale says the human mind, in all of its extensive range
of thought, is not able to conceive a splendid glass vase cut in a more
elaborate and novel way. At the first sight one is confounded with
astonishment, and knows not whether what we see is real, or whether on
a sudden we have not been transported to another globe. To England is
due the honor of its production, and it comes from the hands of one of
its numerous celebrated artists, Mr. Gunby. The precious metal, gold,
glitters in all its glory, intermixed, or rather united with
extraordinary beauty of cutting and rich and splendid enamelled
painting. One is at a loss whether most to admire the shape, the
gorgeous brilliancy, the sparkle of the gems, the beauty of the
cutting, the enamelling, the general conception, or the immense bulk of
this magnificent and astounding work of art."

The "Scientific American" states, "The troupe of glass-blowers at Hope
Chapel furnish a very interesting evening's entertainment for those who
are fond of practical things. A steam-engine, most beautifully
constructed of different colored glass, is worked by steam all the
time. The nature of the material affords an opportunity to see all the
several parts moving at once, and it is really a very curious sight,
even to an engineer, and one that will well repay a visit."

Among the numerous specimens of ancient glass now in the British
Museum, there are enough of the Egyptian and Roman manufacture to
impress us with profound respect for the art as pursued by the earlier
workers in glass. Among them is a fragment considered as the _ne plus
ultra_ of the chemical and manipulatory skill of the ancient workers.
It is described as consisting of no less than five layers or strata of
glass, the interior layer being of the usual blue color, with green and
red coatings, and each strata separated from and contrasted with the
others by layers of white enamel, skilfully arranged by some eminent
artist of the Grecian school. The subject is a female reposing upon a
couch, executed in the highest style of art. It presents a fine
specimen of gem engraving. Among the articles made of common material
are a few green vases about fifteen inches high, in an excellent state
of preservation, and beautiful specimens of workmanship. In the
formation of the double handles and curves, these vases evince a degree
of skill unattained by the glass-blowers of the present period.

The cases in the Egyptian room at the Museum contain several necklaces,
small figures, scarabæi, and other objects, which would appear to an
ordinary observer to be composed of precious stones. They are, in fact,
at least most of them, formed either of glass throughout the whole
substance, or of materials covered with a glass coating. The
manufacture of articles of this description presupposes a market for
them; and the desire upon the part of the less affluent members of
society to possess, at a cheap rate, ornaments in imitation of their
superiors, necessarily leads to the conclusion that, even at the most
ancient of the periods I have mentioned, the Egyptians had made a
remarkable advance in the customs of civilized life. The Museum cases
also exhibit networks of glass bugles, with which the wrappers of
mummies were often decorated; and there is abundance of evidence to
show that wine was frequently served at table in glass bottles and
cups. Alexander the Great is said to have been buried at Alexandria in
a coffin composed wholly of glass.

The specimens taken from the tombs at Thebes are also numerous. Their
rich and varied colors are proofs of the chemical and inventive skill
of the ancients. These specimens embrace not only rich gems and mosaic
work, but also fine examples of the lachrymatory vase. Some of the
vases are made from common materials, with very great skill and taste.
The specimen of glass coin, with hieroglyphical characters, must not be
omitted; as also a miniature effigy of the Egyptian idol "Isis"; a
specimen of which proves that the Egyptians must have been acquainted
with the art of _pressing_ hot glass into metallic moulds, an art
which has been considered of modern invention. English glass-makers
considered the patent pillar glass a modern invention until a Roman
vase was found (it is now to be seen in the Polytechnic Institution in
London), being a complete specimen of pillar moulding. Pillat states in
his work that he had seen an ancient drinking vessel of a Medrecan
form, on a foot of considerable substance, nearly entire, and procured
from Rome, which had the appearance of having been blown in an
open-and-shut mould, the rim being afterwards cut off and polished.
This is high authority, and, with other evidences that might be cited,
goes far to prove that the ancients used moulds for pressing, and also
for blowing moulded articles, similar to those now in use.

Pompeian window-glass, of which panes have been discovered as large as
twenty by twenty-eight inches, has proved, on examination, to have been
cast in a manner similar to that now followed in making plate-glass,
except that it was not rolled flat, as now, by metal cylinders, but
pressed out with a wooden mallet, so that its thickness is not uniform.

A glass has been discovered at Pompeii, about the size of a crown
piece, with a convexity, which leads one to suppose it to be a
magnifying lens. Now, it has been said that the ancients were not aware
of this power, and the invention is given to Galileo by some, to a
Dutchman, in 1621, by others, while a compound microscope is attributed
to one Fontana, in the seventeenth century. But without a magnifying
glass, how did the Greeks and Romans work those fine gems which the
human eye is unable to read without the assistance of a glass? There is
one in the Naples Royal Collection, for example, the legend of which it
is impossible to make out, unless by applying a magnifying power. The
glass in question, with a stone ready cut and polished for engraving,
are now to be seen in the Museum of Naples.

Specimens of colored glass, pressed in beautiful forms for brooches,
rings, beads, and similar ornaments, are numerous. Of those of Roman
production many specimens have been found in England. Some of these
were taken from the Roman barrows. In Wales glass rings have been
found; they were vulgarly called "snake stones," from the popular
notion that they were produced by snakes, but were in fact rings used
by the Druids as a charm with which to impose upon the superstitious.
We find, too, that the specific gravity of the specimens referred to
ranges from 2034 to 3400, proving oxide of lead to have been used in
their manufacture; the mean gravity of modern flint-glass being 3200.

From what we gather from the foregoing facts, we are inclined to the
belief that, in fine fancy work, in colors, and in the imitation of
gems, the ancient glass-makers excelled the modern ones. They were also
acquainted with the art of making and using moulds for blown and
pressed glass, and forming what in England is now called patent pillar
glass. All these operations, however, were evidently on a very limited
scale, their views being mainly directed to the production of small but
costly articles. Although in the time of the Roman manufacturers vases
of extra size were made, requiring larger crucibles and furnaces than
those used by the glass-makers of Tyre, yet it is evident that they
produced few articles except such as were held sacred for sepulchral
purposes, or designed for luxury. And while they possessed the
knowledge of the use of moulds to press and blow glass by expansion, it
does not appear that they produced any articles for domestic use. If it
were not thus, some evidences would be found among the various
specimens which have been preserved.


LEGENDS OF THE GLASS-HOUSE, ETC.

Enough has been adduced to show the peculiar estimation in which the
art of glass-making was formerly held, and the privileges conferred on
it by the various governments of Europe.

The art was thus almost invested with an air of romance; and a
manufacture commanding so much attention on the part of the governments
was regarded with a great share of awe and wonder.

It is not strange that, in this state of things, various legends should
have been identified with the manufacture and its localities. Among
these legends was that which ascribed to the furnace-fire the property
of creating the monster called the Salamander. It was believed, too,
that at certain times this wonderful being issued from his abode, and,
as opportunity offered, carried back some victim to his fiery bed. The
absence of workmen, who sometimes departed secretly for foreign lands,
was always accounted for by the hypothesis that in some unguarded
moment they had fallen a prey to the Salamander. Visitors, too, whose
courage could sustain them, were directed to look through the bye-hole
to the interior of the furnace, and no one failed to discover the
monster coiled in his glowing bed, and glaring with fiery eyes upon the
intruder, much to his discomfiture, and effectually as to his retreat.
Some gallant knights, armed _cap-a-pie_, it is said, dared a combat
with the fiery dragon, but always returned defeated; the important fact
being doubtless then unknown or overlooked, that steel armor, being a
rapid conductor of heat, would be likely to tempt a more ready approach
of the fabled monster.

There was another current notion, that glass was as easily rendered
malleable as brittle, but that the workmen concealed the art, and the
life of any one attempting the discovery was surely forfeited. An
ancient writer on glass, "Isidorus," states that, in the reign of
Tiberius, an artist, banished from Rome on political considerations, in
his retirement discovered the art of rendering glass malleable; he
ventured to return to Rome, in hopes of procuring a remission of his
sentence, and a reward for his invention; the glass-makers, supposing
their interest to be at stake, employed so powerful an influence with
the Emperor (who was made to believe that the value of gold might be
diminished by the discovery), that he caused the artist to be beheaded,
and his secret died with him. "Blancourt" relates that, as late as the
time of Louis XIII., an inventor having presented to Cardinal Richelieu
a specimen of malleable glass of his own manufacture, he was rewarded
by a sentence of perpetual imprisonment, lest the "vested interest" of
French glass manufacturers might be injured by the discovery. Even at
the present day the error is a popular one, that if the art of making
glass malleable were made known, it would have the effect of closing
nearly all the existing glass-works; while the truth is, that quite the
reverse would be the result. Whenever the art of making glass malleable
is made known, it will assuredly multiply the manufacture to a tenfold
degree.

It was formerly the custom for the workmen, in setting pots in the
glass-furnace, to protect themselves from the heat by dressing in the
skins of wild animals from head to foot; to this "outre" garb were
added glass goggle-eyes, and thus the most hideous-looking monsters
were readily presented to the eye. Show was then made of themselves in
the neighborhood, to the infinite alarm of children, old women, and
others. This always occurred, with other mysterious doings, on the
occasion of setting the pot, or any other important movement attendant
on the business. The ground was thus furnished for very much of the
horrible _diablerie_ connected with the whole history of the manufacture.

A belief was long prevalent that glass drinking vessels, made under
certain astronomical influences, would certainly fly to pieces if any
poisonous liquid was placed in them; and sales of vessels of this kind
were made at enormous prices. Another idea pervaded the community, that
vessels of a certain form, made in a peculiar state of the atmosphere,
and after midnight, would allow a pure diamond to pass directly through
the bottom of the vessel. Various articles, such as colored goblets,
were thought to add to the flavor of wine, and to detract materially
from its intoxicating quality.

All these, and many other popular notions, added greatly to the mystery
and renown of glass manufacturers. We close this number with an extract
from "Howell's Familiar Letters." "Murano," says he, "a little island
about one mile from Venice, is the place where crystal glass is made,
and it is a rare sight to see whole streets where on one side there are
twenty furnaces at work. They say here, that although one should
transfer a furnace from Murano to Venice, or to any of the little
assembled islands about here, or to any other part of the earth beside,
to use the same materials, the same workmen, the same fuel, and the
selfsame ingredients every way, yet they cannot make crystal glass in
that perfection for beauty and lustre as at Murano. Some impute it to
the circumambient air, which is purified and attenuated by the
concurrence of so many fires, that are in these furnaces night and day
perpetually, for they are like the vestal fires, never going out."

There is no manufacturing business carried on by man combining so many
inherent contingencies, as that of the working of flint glass. There is
none demanding more untiring vigilance on the part of the daily
superintendent, or requiring so much ability and interest in the work.
Unlike all other branches of labor, it is carried on by night and day,
is governed by no motive power connected with steam or water, and has
no analogy to the production of labor by looms or machinery.

The crude material of earth being used, each portion requires careful
refining from natural impurities, and when compounded, being dependent
upon combustion in the furnace for its completion, (which combustion is
effected by change of the atmosphere beyond the power of man to direct,
but exercises a power to affect the heat of the furnace acting for good
or for evil,) much responsibility rests upon the furnace-tenders;
constant care on their part is required. A slight neglect affects the
quality of the glass. A check upon the furnace in founding-time will
spoil every pot of metal for the best work. Overheat, too, will destroy
the pots, and the entire weekly melt will be launched into the cave, at
a loss of several thousand dollars. Even with the utmost care, a rush
of air will not uncommonly pass through the furnace and destroy one or
more pots in a minute's space. And when the furnace has yielded a full
melt, and is ready for work, many evils are at hand, and among the
ever-jarring materials of a glass-house, some one becomes adverse to a
full week's work; vigilance is not always the price of success.

Again: no branch of mechanical labor possesses more of attraction for
the eye of the stranger or the curious, than is to be witnessed in a
glass-house in full play. The crowded and bee-like movements of the
workmen, with irons and hot metal, yet each, like the spheres of his
own orbit, presents a scene apparently of inextricable confusion.

It is a difficult task to describe the curious and interesting
operations of the glass-blowers; for the present we may say, that there
is no other employment so largely dependent upon steadiness of nerve
and calm self-possession. The power of manipulation is the result of
long experience. The business of the glass-blower is literally at his
"fingers' ends." It is most interesting to witness the progress of his
labor, from the first gathering of the liquid metal from the pot, and
the passing it from hand to hand, until the shapeless and apparently
uncontrollable mass is converted into some elegant article. Equally
interesting is it to witness with what dexterity he commands, and with
what entire ease he controls the melted mass; the care, also, with
which he swings it with force just enough to give it the desired
length, joins it to other pieces, or with shears cuts it with the same
ease as paper. The whole process, indeed, is one filled with the most
fascinating interest and power.

Of all the articles of glass manufacture, none command a greater degree
of attention than the article called the salver, and no other develops
so pleasing and surprising effects in its processes. When seen for the
first time, the change from a shapeless mass, the force with which it
flies open at the end of the process, changing in an instant into a
perfect article, all combine to astonish and delight the beholder.

Mystery is as much a characteristic of the art now as at any former
period; but it is a mystery unallied to superstition,--a mystery whose
interpreter is science,--a mystery which, instead of repelling the
curious and frightening the ignorant, now invites the inquiring and
delights the unlearned.

By the following, we find that the romance of glass-making has not yet
died out. We copy from the "Paris Annual of Scientific Discovery," for
1863, the following:--

"It would appear there is yet some secret in glass-making unknown to
the world at large, as the manufactory of Mr. Daguet, of Soletere,
France, is known to be in possession of an undivulged method, which
enables them to make glass of a purity which all other manufacturers
are not able to rival. A railway, recently constructed and running past
Mr. Daguet's works, has so affected the glass-pots, by the tremor
occasioned by the locomotives and trains, that work has had to be
suspended. For this Mr. Daguet brought an action, during the past year,
against the railway company for damages; but when the case came on for
trial, the court held that it would be impossible to assess damages
unless it were made cognizant of the secret, and its pecuniary
advantage to Mr. Daguet. The latter declined imparting this, and the
court refused to proceed further."

We have shown that glass, while it has contributed so largely to the
material well-being of man, has also administered profusely to the
pleasure of woman. The belle enjoys the reflection of her beauty in its
silvered face,--a pleasure peculiarly her own, as we all know,--and if
we may believe poesy, the mermaid, her rival of the coral groves in the
fathomless ocean, looks with equal satisfaction upon her dubious form,
as seen in her hand-mirror. And what would Cinderella be to the nursery
without her glass slipper!

But leaving poetry to its own prolific devices, where would science
find itself without the aid of glass? The astronomer's and chemist's
vocation would be gone. Suns, planets, and stars would have no exact
existence to us, and their laws be unknown. The seaman would blunder
his way on the ocean, lucky if he guessed aright his course, and
cursing his "stars," when he did not. In short, glass is the
indispensable servant of science in almost all its forms, and where it
does not discover it protects. Its loss would throw back the world into
antediluvian ignorance, not to mention the countless eyes it would
deprive of sight, of their intellectual food, and freedom of way.


MANUFACTURE OF GLASS IN THE UNITED STATES, ETC.

The last number of our series of articles upon this highly interesting
subject--interesting both as concerns the various features of the
manufacture, and as indicative of the progress of the art in the
successive ages of the world's history--closed the sketch of the rise
and progress of the manufacture of flint glass. Our sketch has covered
the ground so far as time would allow, from the introduction of the art
into Egypt, through its transfer to Tyre and Sidon, and from thence, in
its order, to Rome, Venice, France, and finally into England.

The reader will notice that this progress, like that of many others, is
almost identical, for a time at least, with the gradual extension of
conquest, and especially with this, as connected with the extension of
the Roman sway.

We now reach the period of its introduction into the Western continent,
and propose giving an outline of its gradual extension and
characteristics in our own land.

Our opportunity of research as to the period of the introduction of
glass manufacture into this country, induce the belief that the first
effort was made some years before the American Revolution.

This attempt was by a company of Germans, who selected the town of
Quincy, in this State, as the place in which to establish the
manufacture.

We are acquainted with little beyond the fact, that such an attempt was
made; their success, or the length of time during which they carried on
the work, are matters equally beyond our knowledge. Some specimens of
their articles still exist, showing mainly that they engaged in the
manufacture of what is called black metal only; these also are of the
rudest style of the art.

The place in Quincy in which their manufactory was established acquired
the name from them of "Germantown," which name it retains to the
present time. The site of their manufactory is now occupied, we
believe, by the institution called "The Sailors' Snug Harbor."

A Connecticut paper states a patent was granted by that State, in 1747,
for twenty years, to Thomas Darling, for the exclusive privilege of
making glass. This Act appears to have become void, because of the
patentee not fulfilling its conditions, and at various times after this
special grants were made to others to introduce the manufacture of
glass.

The Historical Society of Brooklyn, N.Y., has in their cabinet "a
glass bottle, the first one manufactured at a glass-works started, in
1754, near the site of the present glass-works in State Street. This
enterprise, we are informed, was brought to an untimely end for want of
sand,--that is, the right kind of sand." From this we infer, it must be
a flint-glass bottle, as the sand suitable for green or black glass
abounds on their shore.

Shortly after the close of the Revolutionary struggle, we think about
the year 1785, the late Robert Hewes, a well-known citizen of Boston,
made, probably, the first attempt to establish a window-glass
manufactory on this continent. This manufactory was modelled upon the
German system. Mr. Hewes carried his works to the fuel, and erected his
factory in the then forest of New Hampshire. The writer well remembers,
when a boy, hearing Mr. Hewes relate, that when building his
glass-works the tracks of bears were frequently seen in the morning in
and around his works.

From the best information in our possession, we think that to Mr.
Robert Hewes must be conceded the first attempt to establish
window-glass making in the United States, or in the western world. The
aim of Mr. Hewes was doubtless to supply the most important and
necessary article made of glass, and called for by the immediate wants
of the people, viz., window-glass. It ended, however, in disappointment
to the projector, probably from the frequent error of carrying such
works into the interior, to the vicinity of fuel, or from lack of skill
on the part of the workmen.

This attempt was followed, about the year 1787, by Messrs. Whalley,
Hunnewell, and their associates, and by the workmen Plumback and
Cooper, who erected a large factory in Essex Street, Boston (where
Edinboro' Street now is), for the purpose of making the Crown Window
Glass. This was without success, until a German, of the name of Lint,
arrived in the year 1803, and from this period there was great success
in the manufacture, for the State of Massachusetts, to encourage the
manufacture of window-glass, paid the proprietors a bounty on every
table of glass made by them. This was done to counteract the effect of
the bounty paid by England on the exportation of glass from that
kingdom. The State bounty had the effect to encourage the proprietors
and sustain their efforts, so that by perseverance many difficulties
were overcome, and a well-earned reputation supported for the strength
and clearness of their glass; a glass superior to the imported, and
well known throughout the United States as "Boston Window-Glass." This
reputation they steadily sustained, until they made glass in their new
works at South Boston, in the year 1822. Their charter from the State
was highly favorable to the stockholders; among the privileges it
granted an exclusive right to manufacture for fifteen years, and to
manufacture glass without their consent subjected the offender to a
fine of five hundred dollars for each offence. Their capital was exempt
from taxation for five years, and the workmen exempted from military
duty.

From the founding of this establishment may be dated the founding of
all the Crown and Cylinder, Window and Flint Glass-Works in the
Atlantic States. Indeed, this may be considered the fruitful parent
tree of the many branches now so widely spread abroad.

The wonderful mystery attached to the art of glass-making seems to have
followed its introduction into this country. The glass-blower was
considered a magician, and myriads visited the newly-erected works, and
coming away with a somewhat improved idea of an unmentionable place and
its occupants; and the man who could compound the materials to make
glass was looked upon as an alchemist who could transmute base metal
into pure gold.

The fame of the works spread into a neighboring State, and in 1810 or
1811 a company was formed in Utica, to establish glass-works in that
place, and quite a number of workmen in the Essex Street Works were
induced to leave their employ and break their indentures from the offer
of increased wages; while, however, on their way, and just before they
reached the State line, they, with the agent, were arrested, brought
back, and expensive lawsuits incurred. The Utica Works were abandoned,
and, we believe, never revived.

Subsequently another company was formed in New York, being influenced
by a fallacious view of the silicious sand. This company erected their
works at Sandy Lake, a locality abounding both in silex and fuel. A few
years' trial convinced the proprietors the place was ill chosen, and,
after the experience of heavy losses, it was abandoned.

A Doctor Adams, of Richmond, Virginia, made large offers of increased
wages to the workmen of the Essex Street Works, who were then induced
to abandon their place of work and violate their indentures. They
succeeded in reaching Richmond to try their fortune under the auspices
of the Doctor. A few years' experience convinced them of the fallacy of
increased pay; for, after very heavy losses, the works were abandoned
and the workmen thrown out of employ. The proprietors of the Essex
Street Works had engaged workmen in the mean time, at a very heavy
expense, from England--a most difficult task, for the English
government made it a penal offence to entice workmen to leave the
kingdom at that period.

In 1811 the proprietors of the Essex Street Works erected large and
improved works on the shore at South Boston. To supply the workmen
enticed away, and also to meet the wants of their factory, an agent was
sent to England to procure a set of glass-workers. By the time they
reached this country the war with England broke out, and the enterprise
was thus defeated; for it became difficult to procure fuel and the
various means for carrying on the Essex Street Works.

The making of window-glass in Boston led to the introduction of the
manufacture of flint-glass, arising from the excess of window-glass
blowers, brought into the country by the enterprise of the Boston
Window-Glass Company; many among the number from Europe had worked more
or less in flint-glass works (no unusual thing in England), for a good
flint-glass blower, with manual strength, can fill the part of a
window-glass blower, and exceedingly well.

Among the number was a Mr. Thomas Caines, now living at South Boston,
having retired from the business with an independent property, the
honest fruit of his skill and industry; he may be truly considered as
the father of the flint-glass business in the Atlantic States.

Mr. Caines proved competent to the task, not only as a first-rate
workman, but possessed the art of mixing the materials and being able
to sustain all the other departments appertaining to the business. He
prevailed upon the proprietors to erect a small six-pot flint furnace
in part of their large unoccupied manufactory in South Boston.

At that time the articles of flint-glass imported by the earthenware
trade were confined to a very few articles, such as German straw
tumblers, cruets, salts, and plain decanters of cheap fabric; of the
finer articles, to cut finger tumblers, sham diamond cut dishes, and
Rodney decanters; a quality of glass and cutting that would not at the
present day command one-fifth of their then cost.

War having interrupted the importation of glass, the manufactory
supplied the then limited demand, and gave full employ for their
factory.

Contemporaneous with the South Boston enterprise, a company was formed
and incorporated under the title of the Porcelain and Glass
Manufacturing Company. Their factory was located at East Cambridge,
then called Craigie's Point. Their china department was directed by a
Mr. Bruitan, but for want of proper materials it proved an entire
failure. Their glass-works were under the direction of a Mr. Thompson,
who built a small six-pot furnace, similar in size to the one at South
Boston. Thompson brought out a set of hands, at a heavy expense, to
work the furnace, but the result proved he was in no way qualified for
the task, nor possessed of the least practical skill or knowledge of
the business, and of course proving an entire failure. The attempt to
make porcelain and glass was abandoned by the company.

In 1815, some of the workmen left the South Boston Factory and hired of
the Porcelain Company their six-pot furnace, and commenced the making
of flint-glass under the firm of Emmet, Fisher & Flowers. They
succeeded for a time very well, and turned out glass suitable for the
trade; but want of concert of action prevented a successful result, and
they dissolved without loss. The Porcelain Company, discouraged by so
many failures, agreed to wind up their concern, and in November, 1817,
they disposed of their entire property at public auction.

As one manufactory dies out only to give place to another, so the
present New England Glass Company was formed, and became the purchasers
of the Porcelain Works. That company, from 1817, to the present time,
have pursued the business with signal success; beginning with the small
capital of forty thousand dollars, they have from time to time
increased it, until it amounts at the present time to half a million of
dollars. They commenced business with a small six-pot furnace, holding
seven hundred pounds to each pot; employed, all told, about forty
hands, and the yearly product did not exceed forty thousand dollars.
They now run five furnaces, averaging ten pots to each, capacity of two
thousand pounds to each pot. They employ over five hundred men and
boys, and the yearly product is not less than five hundred thousand
dollars.

In 1820 some of their workmen left them, built a factory in New York
City, and conducted their business under the firm of Fisher &
Gillerland. In 1823 Gillerland dissolved the connection and built, on
his own account, a manufactory in Brooklyn, N.Y., which he conducts at
this period with great skill and success, and is considered the best
metal mixer in the United States.

In 1825 a Flint-Glass Manufactory was established by individual
enterprise in Sandwich, Mass. Ground was broke in April, dwellings for
the workmen built, and manufactory completed; and on the 4th day of
July, 1825, they commenced blowing glass--three months from first
breaking ground. In the following year it was purchased of the
proprietor, a company formed, and incorporated under the title of
Boston and Sandwich Glass Company. Like their predecessors, they
commenced in a small way; beginning with an eight-pot furnace, each
holding eight hundred pounds. The weekly melts at that period did not
exceed seven thousand pounds, and yearly product seventy-five thousand
dollars; giving employment to from sixty to seventy hands. From time to
time, as their business warranted, they increased their capital until
it reached the present sum of four hundred thousand dollars. Their
weekly melts have increased from seven thousand pounds to much over one
hundred thousand pounds; their hands employed from seventy to over five
hundred; their one furnace of eight pots to four furnaces of ten pots;
and yearly product from seventy-five thousand dollars to six hundred
thousand dollars.

In 1820 another secession of workmen from the New England Glass Company
took place, to embark on their own account their savings of many years
in the doubtful enterprise of establishing flint-glass works in
Kensington, Philadelphia, under the title of the Union Flint-Glass
Company. The proprietors, being all workmen, were enthusiastic in the
project, happy in the belief that they could carry it on successfully,
work when convenient, and enjoy much leisure. All was _then_ to them
sunshine. Ere long they realized the many inherent evils attendant on
flint-glass works; the demon of discord appeared among them, and they
discovered, when too late, that they had left a place of comfort and
ease for a doubtful enterprise. Death thinned their ranks, and the
works, after passing into other hands for a short trial, have years
since ceased to exist.

From 1820 to 1840 very many attempts were made, by corporations and
firms, to establish the manufacture of flint-glass in the Atlantic
States, but almost with entire failure. The parent tree, the old South
Boston concern, failed; the works were revived from time to time by at
least five different concerns, and all ended in failure; and for years
the works remained closed, till the present occupant, Mr. Patrick
Slane, hired the premises, and by his enterprise and great industry has
greatly enlarged the works, and is now carrying on a large and active
business. In his factory we learn the old system among the operatives
he does not allow to have a foothold, and the individual industry of
his hands is not cramped or limited by the oppressive system of the old
school operative.

As a record of the past and a reference for the future, we find, in
reviewing the various attempts to establish flint-glass works in the
Atlantic States, that it would not be just to place the names of those
identified with them before the reader; for many were deluded by the
projectors with promises of the most flattering success, but realized
only disappointment and loss.

In enumerating all the concerns, companies, and corporations that have
been engaged in the manufacture of flint-glass in the Atlantic States,
we find the number to be forty-two; of which number two concerns have
retired, and ten are now in operation, viz., two at East Cambridge,
three at South Boston, one at Sandwich, three near New York City, and
one at Philadelphia; leaving two concerns who retired with property,
and twenty-eight out of the forty-two concerns entire failures,
involving the parties interested in heavy loss, the fate of the
existing ten to be determined by future events.

Before closing, we may allude to the repeated failure of permanently
establishing window- and bottle-glass works in this vicinity. The
primary cause has been in the construction of the furnaces, no
improvement for centuries having taken place, but the old defective
plan being adhered to by workmen from Europe. A casual observer must
see they are defective, and consume double the quantity of fuel really
required for the weekly melts. The rate of wages for experienced
workmen, about threefold over the German rates, has heretofore checked
success, but at the present time is more than compensated by machinery
and materials.

The manufacture of plate-glass offers a profitable and inviting field
that should be improved. The consumption in this country is large and
increasing yearly. Materials are cheaper than in Europe, and as the
most essential part is performed by machinery and motive power, this
will more than equalize the extra rate of wages that may be taxed upon
a new undertaking.

We have recorded the rise and progress of the Glass Manufacture in the
Atlantic States, showing its course from its introduction in 1812 to
the present period, _i.e._ 1852, covering a space of time of just forty
years.

We now turn to the introduction of the manufacture in the Western
States, for the account of which we are indebted to Mr. Thomas
Bakewell, of Pittsburg, Penn. Mr. Bakewell advises us, that, prior to
the year 1808, glass-works were established by a company of Germans,
near Fredericktown, Maryland, under the direct control of a Mr.
Amelong, for the purpose of manufacturing glass in all its branches. We
have not ascertained the precise year in which Mr. Amelong commenced
the manufacture; but previous to the year 1808 the establishment was
broken up, and the workmen dispersed. Most of them reached Pittsburg,
Penn., and a part of them were engaged by Col. James O'Hara, in the
establishment of the first window-glass factory in the Western States.
The same factory is in operation to the present day, and others of the
Fredericktown company were instrumental in introducing the same branch
of the glass business into Pennsylvania, at New Geneva, upon the
property of the late Albert Gallatin. Others of the number, previously
mentioned, established themselves in Baltimore, and in all of the
places noticed. Some of their descendants still continue the business.

There are at this time ten window-glass factories in the vicinity of
Pittsburg, and fifteen in the river towns,--in all twenty-five
works,--manufacturing over 220,000 boxes of window-glass of 100 feet
each annually.

We now proceed to examine a more interesting topic, viz., the rise and
progress of the flint-glass business in the West. We have shown that
most of the workmen, on the breaking up of the glass-works in
Fredericktown, migrated to Pittsburg, attracted there, doubtless, by
the coal mines. Some of these persons were successful in establishing
the manufacture of window-glass, while a portion of the workmen, in the
spring of the year 1808, attempted to establish a flint-glass
manufactory upon part of the premises now occupied by Bakewell & Pears,
extensive flint-glass manufacturers. The persons engaged in the
enterprise, however, were deficient, both in the requisite knowledge
and capital; the effort proved abortive, the parties quarrelled, and
the establishment, in an incomplete condition, was offered for sale.

In the August following, a Mr. Bakewell and his friend, Mr. Page, being
on a visit to Pittsburg, were induced to purchase the concern, under
the representation of one of the owners that he possessed the
information and skill requisite for the proper pursuit of the business,
having been engaged (as he stated) in the business before he left
England. Mr. Bakewell had scarcely entered upon his new pursuit before
he discovered that the qualification of the person alluded to had been
entirely misrepresented, and that to succeed he must rely upon his own
experience and diligence in the attainment of the peculiar knowledge
indispensable to the success of his undertaking. In this the fortune of
his family and friend were, of course, deeply involved, and he
therefore set himself to the accomplishment of his task most manfully.
Those only who have practical experience of the character of the
undertaking can fully appreciate the various and almost insurmountable
difficulties to be encountered and overcome before success could be
attained.

His first difficulty arose from want of skill in the workmen, and the
inferiority of the materials employed in the manufacture of
flint-glass. So little were the resources of the West developed at that
day, that Mr. Bakewell had to procure his pearlash and red lead from
Philadelphia, the pot clay from Burlington, N.J.,--the whole being
transported over the mountains in wagons to Pittsburg. The only sand
then known was the yellow kind, obtained in the vicinity, and used at
this time only for window-glass. For many years Mr. Bakewell obtained
the saltpetre needed from the caves of Kentucky, in a crude state,
which article he was obliged to purify, until the period of 1815, when
the required supply was obtained from Calcutta.

The few workmen then in the country were not well instructed in the
making of glass articles, after the glass was prepared, to which was
added the great evil (which has too usually prevailed among the
imported workmen) of a determination to prevent the instruction of
apprentices by the most arbitrary and unjust means, and, so far as it
was in their power, endeavoring to prevent competition, by not only
controlling the hours of work, but the quantity of manufacture; in
fact, doing the least amount of work possible for the largest amount of
pay that could be coerced from the proprietors. Experience, however,
showed Mr. Bakewell how to construct his furnaces, or, at least, to
improve on the old; and he discovered better materials in his immediate
vicinity, and succeeded in making purer glass than he had before made.
The oppressive acts of the workmen, in the mean time, compelled Mr.
Bakewell to resort to England for new workmen, at a time when the
prohibitory laws there in regard to mechanics leaving England were in
full force,--an undertaking requiring great secrecy, and at the risk of
long imprisonment if detected.

Such were some of the embarrassing circumstances with which Mr.
Bakewell had to contend. Of the full force and extent of these, those
only can conceive who have been under like necessities and
circumstances. But a brighter day was dawning upon his exertions, and
at length his arduous and untiring labor was crowned with the desired
success. Good clay was procured from Holland, and purer materials
discovered; competent workmen were either imported or instructed, and
the flint-glass manufacture was firmly established at Pittsburg. From
this first establishment there originated, in a few years, many other
glass-works, erected chiefly by persons who had acquired the art with
Mr. Bakewell, or had obtained the requisite means while in his employ.
We may well consider Mr. Bakewell as the father of the flint-glass
business in this country; for he commenced the work in 1808, and by
untiring efforts and industry brought it to a successful issue.

For the skill, judgment, labor, and perseverance devoted by him to the
progress of the art, he truly merits the "Artium Magister" so often
bestowed on those least worthy of its dignity and honor. Theory in
Science too often receives the meed which practical progress in its
walks so richly deserves. Mr. Bakewell lived to realize an ample
fortune as the fruit of his industry, and his sons still carry on a
profitable business on the premises originally occupied by their
father. By father and sons this has covered a space of forty-four
years, a length of time rarely finding a business in the same family in
America. May the factory be always occupied and conducted by a
Bakewell.

The furnace built by Mr. Bakewell in 1808 contained only six pots,
twenty inches in diameter, which were replaced in 1810 by a ten-pot
furnace of a larger capacity, and in 1814 another furnace was added to
the works, of like capacity.

In 1809 another concern sprung up, and carried on the business on a
limited scale; in 1812 another succeeded, making three concerns
carrying on the business; and in 1810 another company was formed, but
failed in a few years.

There are now in Pittsburg nine concerns manufacturing flint-glass,
running thirteen furnaces and one hundred and five pots. There are also
three concerns at Wheeling, running five furnaces and forty-five pots.
There are also at Wellsville, Steubenville, and Cincinnati one or two
factories each, besides several manufactories for green glass jars, and
one for the making of porter bottles; one also for mineral-water
bottles.

The first glass-cutting works were opened in 1809 by a German of the
name of Echbaum, who had settled in Pittsburg some years previously.
Mr. Bakewell also carried on glass-cutting, and among his workmen was
an Englishman who had served as a soldier in Canada, being taken as a
prisoner in one of the battles on the Lakes in 1813. He proved not only
a good glass-cutter, but an excellent mechanic, in various branches;
but still a dissipated and idle man, and of course of but little
service in the manufactory.

One of the amusing incidents connected with the manufacture occurred
when General Clark (then Governor of Missouri) took a party of Osage
Chiefs to Washington. On their way they visited Bakewell's Glass-Works,
and their attention was greatly excited; they watched with great
curiosity the process of making various articles, and the mode of
affixing the handle to a glass pitcher quite disturbed the equanimity
of the head chief, who, after shaking hands with the workmen, said,
through the interpreter, "That man must have had some intercourse with
the Great Spirit."

The following, from Sigma's pen, shows a decanter-stopper can be made
to point a moral or illustrate a satire:--"Mr. Flint, in his 'Ten Years
in the Valley of the Mississippi,' tells a pleasant story of an Indian
who told him he had _big diamond_, for which he had given trader _much
beaver_. A time was appointed, and Mr. Flint visited the wigwam to
examine the diamond, which, after considerable mystery, was brought
forth from its place of concealment, and proved to be a broken glass
decanter-stopper. When an individual, eminent for his talents and
learning, has been justly decorated with the degree of LL.D., and finds
the same mark of distinction bestowed upon others who are remarkable
for neither, he cannot fail to perceive an amusing resemblance between
his diploma and Kunkerpot's diamond."


IMITATION OF MUSLIN-GLASS.

Here is a simple and ingenious means of giving to glass the appearance
of delicately wrought muslin:--

The process, which comes to us from Germany, consists in spreading very
smoothly a piece of lace or tulle, and covering it with some fatty
substance by means of a printer's roller. The glass being carefully
cleaned, the cloth is laid upon it so as to leave in fat a print on the
surface of all the threads of the fabric.

The glass is then exposed about five minutes to the vapors of
hydrofluoric acid, which roughens the spaces between the lines, and
leaves the polish on the surface under the fat.

A glass thus prepared becomes like a veil, protecting from exterior
indiscretion persons who, from their apartment, desire to look
commodiously outside.

We recall here that the manipulation of hydrofluoric acid requires
great prudence. This acid is so corrosive that a drop of its vapor
condensed produces upon the hand a lively inflammation, and may even
lead to graver accidents. Breathing the emanations should therefore be
avoided with the greatest care.


No art has been characterized, in the course of its progress, by so
much of wonder and undefined belief in the supernatural, as that of the
manufacture of glass in its various modes and articles.

The old glass-works in Wellsburg, Va., were pulled down a few years
since with a tremendous crash. They were erected in 1816, and, with the
exception of the establishments at Pittsburg, were the oldest west of
the mountains. The beginning of their career was prosperous, but the
last owners have invariably sunk money in carrying on the works, and to
prevent further losses they have now been finally destroyed, and the
ground turned into a potato-patch.


[From the "Scientific American."]

ETCHING AND ORNAMENTING GLASS.

The hardest glass may be etched and frosted with a peculiar liquid
acid, and also with this acid in the condition of vapor. When powdered
fluor spar is heated with concentrated sulphuric acid in a platinum or
a lead retort, and connected with a refrigerator by a tube of lead, a
very volatile, colorless liquid is obtained, which emits copious white
and suffocating fumes. This is hydrofluoric acid, a dilute solution of
which attacks glass with avidity, while neither sulphuric, nitric, nor
muriatic acid has the least effect upon it. In a diluted state it is
employed for glass etching, for which purpose it is kept in a lead
vessel, because it has very little affinity for this metal. The vapor
of this acid is also used for the same purpose. The glass to be
operated upon is first coated with a ground of wax, and the design to
be etched is then traced through the wax with a sharp instrument. In a
shallow lead basin some powdered fluor spar is then placed, and a
sufficient quantity of sulphuric acid poured upon it to convert it into
a thin paste. The glass to be etched is now placed in the basin, to
which a gentle heat is applied, when the vapor of the acid is
disengaged and attacks the traced lines from which the wax has been
removed. The operation is completed in a few minutes, the glass is
removed, and the wax cleaned off with warm oil of turpentine. All those
parts which have remained covered with the wax are now clear as before,
while the other parts drawn by lines to represent figures have a
frosted appearance. Any person can produce figures on glass with this
acid, but, for reasons before stated, it is dangerous to use.

In October, 1859, a patent was granted to James Napier, of Glasgow,
Scotland, for a very simple method of ornamenting glass with fluoric
acid. Instead of drawing patterns and figures on the glass with the use
of varnish and a graver to prepare the glass for etching, the glass is
prepared by simply transferring pictures from prints, which can be
performed by almost any person. The method is, to take a print,
lithograph, or picture made with printer's ink, and fix the printed
surface to the glass by any ordinary paste made from starch. All the
air must be carefully excluded from between the print and glass. When
perfectly dry, liquid hydrofluoric acid about the specific gravity of
1.14 is applied for about three minutes, when it is washed in water to
remove the paper and the acid, and the figure of the print is then
found upon the glass. The printed portion of the paper may also be cut
in outline and pasted on the glass, then transferred. Glass that is
"flashed" on the surface with another color may be treated in this
manner, when a portion of the flashing or surface will be removed, and
the picture will remain in color.


COLORED GLASS.

The distinguished French chemist, M. Chevreul, who has devoted so much
attention to the subject of color, has lately published a memoir on
painted windows, in which there are many points which deserve the
attention of artists and others who are interested in the manufacture
of colored glass. It has often been much noticed that old stained glass
windows have a much richer effect than modern ones, and M. Chevreul,
speaking of this superiority, attributes it to what moderns regard as
defects. In the first place, much of the ancient glass is of unequal
thickness, and so presents convex and concave parts, which refract the
light differently and produce an agreeable effect. In the next place
the old colored glass is not a colorless glass, to which has been added
the particular coloring material, such as protoxide of cobalt, &c. Old
glass contains a good deal of oxide of iron, which colors it green, and
to this must be attributed the peculiar effects of antique glass,
colored by cobalt and manganese. M. Chevreul appears to think that
modern stained glass is too transparent to produce the best effects. M.
Regnault, the chemist, has recommended that all this kind of stained
glass should be cast, to avoid the monotonous effect of plain surfaces
on the light; and also that foreign substances should be mixed with the
glass to diminish its transparency.

Many attempts have been made to color with ruby or other colors gas
shades, so as to throw on surrounding objects the color of the glass;
but in no case has the ray of light passing through colored glass, to
refract the shade, been successful.

But when a ray of solar light is passed through a colorless prism, it
is refracted, and forms, when thrown on a wall or screen, a broad band
of colored light,--red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and
violet,--which is known as the prismatic or solar spectrum.


ARTIFICIAL DIAMONDS.

We find a report in French journals that M. Gannal has succeeded in
obtaining _crystals_, having all the property of the diamond, through
the mutual reaction of phosphorus water and bisulphide of carbon upon
each other for the space of fifteen weeks.

The crystals were found to be so hard that no file would act upon them.
They cut glass like ordinary diamonds, and scratched the hardest steel.
In brilliancy and transparency they were in no way inferior to the best
jewels, and some possessed a lustre surpassing that of most real
stones.


For reference we record the cost of materials for flint-glass, say in
1840 to 1845, as follows:--

    Litherage, or red lead, cost    6-1/2 cts. per lb.
    Pearlash,                       6      "      "
    Nitre,                          6      "      "
    Silex,                          0-1/2  "      "

Present price, 1864:--

    Red lead,         21    cts. per lb.
    Pearlash,         17     "      "
    Nitre,             6     "      "
    Silex,             0-3/4 "      "

We now refer to the early introduction of the manufacture of glass into
England. The English manufacturers, like ourselves, had to struggle
with the various evils incident to the introduction of a new art.
France and Germany, from their long experience in the making of glass,
were enabled for a long time to undersell the English manufacturer in
his own market.

To foster and protect this branch of national industry, the English
government imposed a heavy tax on all foreign glass imported into their
dominions. This measure secured to the English manufacturer the entire
trade, both with their colonies and with the home market, thus giving
such substantial encouragement to the enterprise, that, in a few years,
the manufacture was so much increased as to admit of exportation.

To stimulate the exportation of various articles of English production,
the government, in the latter part of the eighteenth century, granted
bounties, from time to time, on linens, printed cottons, glass, &c, &c.
Until the bounty on glass was allowed, the exportation of glass from
England to foreign countries was very limited; for the French and
Germans, as has before been stated, for various reasons could undersell
the English; but the government bounty changed the aspect of affairs,
and shortly the English manufacturers not only competed with the
Germans and French for the foreign market, but actually excluded them
from any participation,--the government bounty being equal to one half
the actual cost of the glass exported.

An Act of Parliament levied on flint-glass an excise duty of
ninety-eight shillings sterling on all glass made in England, which
excise was paid by the manufacturer, being about twenty-five cents per
pound weight, without regard to quality; but if such glass was
exported, the excise officer repaid the tax which it was presumed the
manufacturers had paid, and a clear bounty of twenty-one shillings
sterling was paid by the government to the exporter on each hundred
weight of flint-glass shipped from England, being equal to five cents
per pound. Under such encouragement the export increased from year to
year to a very great extent, so that the excise duty of ninety-eight
shillings sterling on the amount consumed at home did not equal the
amount paid out in bounty. In the year 1812, fifty-second George III.,
an Act was passed reducing the excise duty to forty-nine shillings, and
the export bounty to ten shillings sixpence. In 1815 the Act was
renewed, and again in 1816. In 1825, sixth George IV. chap. 117, an Act
was passed revising the former as to the mode of levying the excise
duty and bounty, so as to prevent frauds on the revenue, which had
hitherto been practised to a very great extent. This act remained in
force until the Premiership of Sir Robert Peel, when both excise and
bounty were abrogated, and the English manufacture stands on the same
footing in foreign countries as those of other nations. By the
protecting hand of the English government the flint-glass manufactories
multiplied with very great rapidity, underselling all other nations,
and not only rivalling, but far excelling them in the beauty,
brilliancy, and density of the articles manufactured.

The greatest stimulus ever given to the glass manufacture of England
was the abolition of the duty on it in 1845. That abolition has
produced a somewhat paradoxical result. While the quantity of glass
made has increased in the proportion of three to one, the number of
manufacturing firms has diminished in the proportion of one to two. In
1844 there were fourteen companies engaged in the manufacture. In 1846
and 1847, following the repeal of the duty, the number had increased to
twenty-four. The glass trade, after the removal of the heavy burden
imposed upon it, seemed to offer a fair opening for money seeking
investment. The demand for glass was so great that the manufacturers
were in despair. Glass-houses sprang up like mushrooms. Joint-stock
companies were established to satisfy the universal craving for
window-panes. And what was the result? Of the four-and-twenty companies
existing in the year 1847, there were left, in 1854, but ten. At this
time there are but seven in the whole United Kingdom. Two established
in Ireland have ceased to exist. In Scotland, the Dumbarton Works, once
famous, were closed in 1831, by the death of one of the partners,
afterwards reopened, and again closed. The seven now existing are all
English.

The manufacture of the finer kinds of glass was introduced into England
not many years ago from Germany, and German operatives were employed at
very high wages. We understand that the English glass is now superior
to the German.

There is only one plate-glass factory in the United States. It was
commenced only two years ago near New York, and we understand that it
has met with encouraging success.

Soon after the introduction of the business into this country, a very
great improvement in the mode of manufacture was introduced. Pallat, in
his admirable work on glass, alludes to the American invention in only
a few words, and passes it by as of but slight importance; but it has
brought about a very great change, and is destined to exert a still
greater; in fact, it has revolutionized the whole system of the
flint-glass manufacture, simply by mould machines for the purpose of
pressing glass into any form. It is well known that glass in its melted
state is not in the least degree malleable, but its ductility is next
to that of gold, and by steady pressure it can be forced into any
shape. The writer has in his possession the first tumbler made by
machinery in this or any other country. Great improvement has of course
taken place in the machinery, insomuch that articles now turned out by
this process so closely resemble cut-glass that the practised eye only
can detect the difference. Still, the entire field of improvement is
not occupied, and greater advances will yet be made. The tendency, in
this particular, has been so to reduce the cost of glass that it has
multiplied the consumption at least tenfold; and there can be no
reasonable doubt but that, at this period, a much larger quantity of
flint-glass is made in this country than in England. The materials
composing glass are all of native production, and may be considered as
from the earth. The pig lead used is all obtained from the mines in the
Western States; ashes from various sources in other States; and silex
is also indigenous. The materials consumed yearly, in the manufacture,
are something near the following estimate:--

    Coal, for fuel,  48,000 tons;
    Silex,            6,500   "
    Ash, Nitre, &c.   2,500   "
    Lead,             3,800   "

for the flint manufacture. How much more is consumed by the
window-glass manufacturers, the writer is without data to determine.

We have recorded the progress of improvement in the manufacture of
glass, and now, relevant to the subject, we propose to examine the
various improvements in working furnaces and glass-houses. To this end
we present to our readers the drawing of a furnace for flint-glass,[1]
with the interior of a glass-house as used by the Venetians, at the
highest point of the art, in the sixteenth century.

          [1] See drawing No. 1, at end of book.

The workmen in glass will see, that, as compared with the factories of
the present day, the Venetians in their instrumentalities were
subjected to many difficulties,--they were oppressed by the furnace
smoke, and in no way protected from the heat of the furnace, or enabled
to breathe fresh atmospheric air; in fact, the impression prevailed in
those days that the external air, drawn into the glass-house, was
detrimental to the business, and therefore it was most cautiously
guarded against.

The drawing is taken from an ancient work on glass, and although
limited in the view, shows the general plan. The factory wall was
conical, and rose like a large chimney, with a few windows for the
admission of light. Exposed to the heat of the summer sun of Venice,
and of the furnace within, neither the comfort nor health of the
workman was secured. The construction of the annealing department shows
two tiers of pans, the use of which must have been attended with great
loss of materials. Yet, with all the perceptible inconvenience, no
material change in construction was made for centuries. The same plan
was adopted in France and England, and it is only within the present
century that any change has taken place in the latter country. In fact,
in the year 1827 an Englishman erected a glass factory on the same plan
in the vicinity of New York, which, from its defective construction for
this climate, soon passed out of use.

The Germans, however, departed from the Venetian plan so far as to
place the furnace in a large and well-ventilated building, but without
a furnace-cone to carry off the heat and smoke; still a decided
improvement was thus effected over the system in use in France and
England.

The plan referred to shows to the practical workmen of the present day
the excessive waste of fuel arising from the construction of the
furnace; for the same expenditure of fuel in the American furnace would
melt ten times the material produced from the Venetian.

It is admitted that the American glass-house is far in advance of the
European ones at the present day, in the particulars of capacity,
ventilation, comfort of the workmen, and economy in fuel. An impression
is very prevalent that glass-making is an unhealthy occupation. It may
have been thus in former times; but, as a matter of fact, no mechanical
employment is more healthy. Dissipated as glass-makers have been in
former days, and careless of their health as they are at present, no
better evidence can be adduced to prove the _generally_ healthy
character of the employment than the fact that the Glass Manufacturing
Company in Sandwich, averaging in their employment three hundred hands,
had not a man sick through the influence of the employment, or one die
in their connection, for the space of twenty years.

Drawing No. 2[2] represents the plan adopted in the French flint-glass
furnaces. These at one period were worked by noblemen only,--the labor
of the furnace-tender and taker-in being performed by servants, as
before stated. The apparel and general style of dress, as indicated by
the drawing, shows that more attention was paid to the fashion of the
day than to comfort. The form of the furnace being similar to the
Venetian shows it to have been subject to the same unnecessary waste of
fuel; but it would appear that the French manufacturers had taken one
step towards improvement, in using the waste fuel of the furnace to
anneal their glass. The Venetians had a separate furnace to anneal
their glass, supported by independent fires, as used at the present
day.

          [2] See drawing No. 2, at end of book.

The place marked D, over the crown of the furnace, is the door of the
annealing oven; but the drawing is so imperfect that the artist does
not show by what flues the smoke escapes, or in what way the glass was
drawn from the annealing oven; for only the external view of the
furnace is given. But it is fair to presume that the plan was the same
as still exists in France, and as adopted by a French company now
working a flint-glass factory in Williamsburg, near New York;
viz.,--the taker-in, so called, mounts by steps to door D and places
the articles in iron pans, which are slowly drawn over the furnace and
through another door on the opposite side, to allow the glass vessels
to cool gradually. The use of this plan is sustained by writers who
describe the tools used to carry the glass articles into the upper oven
to cool. In connection with the drawings of the ancient glass-furnaces,
we deem it proper to give a drawing of glass-makers' tools[3] in use at
that period, so that the glass-makers of the present day may observe
with what instruments their noble predecessors in the art performed
their labor.

          [3] See drawing No. 3, at end of book.

In many of these tools we perceive the same general characters as mark
those in use now. In some, improvements have been effected; while
others are quite obsolete. It is quite curious to observe the etymology
of many of the technical terms of the art in use at the present day.
The name of the present polished iron table, _i.e._ the MARVER, is
derived from the practice of the Italians and French in using slabs of
polished marble. The iron now called the _punty_, from the Italian
_ponteglo_. The tool now called _percellas_, from the word _porcello_.
In fact, nearly all the technical terms in the glass manufacture,
appertaining to the tool or furnace, are derived from the Italian. By
referring to the drawing, we see that the tool marked A is the
blow-iron, that marked B the punty-iron. Their character plainly
indicates that the work made on them must have been confined to small
or light articles. C, the scissors, D, the shears, correspond to those
used at the present day. The tool marked E was used to finish part of
their work. F and G were their large and small ladles,--the small used
to take off the then called alkalic salt, showing that they were
troubled with an excess of this in their time. The shovel, then called
stockle, marked H, was used to carry glass articles to the annealing
oven, forks not being then in use. The crooked iron I was used to stir
up the metal in the pots. The tool L was used to form or hold large
articles, their punty-iron not having sufficient strength. The tool M
was used to carry flat articles to the annealing ovens. The tool N was
used in refining their alkalic salts, and served to take off the salt
as crystallized in course of its manufacture.

The workmen of the present day will see that, as before remarked, many
tools are not altered in form, while in others there is a decided
improvement,--in none more than in the tool E. Tool D is exactly like
those now in use; but many new tools have been introduced since that
period, rendering most of the old tools useless. Improvements in the
form of glass-furnaces, construction of the glass-house, tools, &c.,
have been very gradual,--more so, in fact, than in almost any other
art, when we consider that a period of about four hundred years has
elapsed since the furnaces, tools, &c., herein referred to, were in
use, and that they remained very much the same until the present
century. It is indeed no undue arrogance of claim to say that the very
many improvements in furnaces, working machinery, tools, &c. (such as
enable the manufacturer here to melt with the same fuel double the
quantity of glass that can at present be done in the European
furnaces,) are entirely owing to the progress of the art in this
country. By the perfection of our machines double the product can be
obtained; and although the glass maker is paid at least three times the
wages usually paid in Germany or France, we can, in all the articles
where the value of the materials predominates, compete successfully
with importers of foreign glass; but when the labor on glass
constitutes its chief value, then glass can be imported cheaper than it
can be manufactured in this country. Essentially, however, we may say,
in the realm of art as in that of civilization and progress,--

    "Westward the star of empire takes its way."


PRESSED GLASS.

This important branch of glass-making demands more than a passing
notice. Although it is commonly believed here that the invention
originated in this country, the claim cannot be fully sustained. Fifty
years back the writer imported from Holland salts made by being pressed
in metallic moulds, and from England glass candlesticks and table
centre-bowls, plain, with pressed square feet, rudely made, somewhat
after the present mode of moulding glass. From 1814 to 1838, no
improvement was made in Europe in this process, which was confined to
common salts and square feet.

America can claim the credit of great improvements in the needful
machinery which has advanced the art to its present perfection. More
than three quarters of the weekly melt is now worked up into pressed
glass, and it is estimated that upwards of two million dollars has been
expended in the moulds and machines now used in this particular branch
of glass-making. This leaves Europe far behind us in this respect. With
us there is active competition for excellence. It is, however, conceded
that James B. Lyon & Co., of Pittsburg, stand first. To such a degree
of delicacy and fineness have they carried their manufacture, that only
experts in the trade can distinguish between their straw stem wines,
and other light and beautiful articles made in moulds, and those blown
by the most skilled workmen. When we consider the difference in the
cost between pressed and blown ware, this rivalry in beauty of the
former with the latter becomes all the more important to the public, as
it cheapens one of the staple necessaries of civilized life.

Great credit therefore is due this firm for their success in overcoming
difficulties well understood by glass-makers, and doing away with the
prejudice of the skilled blowers, who naturally were not inclined to
put the new and more mechanical process of manufacturing glass on a par
with the handicraft of the old. Lyon & Co. also excel all other
American firms in large ware for table services, as well as in the more
delicate objects of use.

In speaking of the improvements in glass-making in America, we must not
overlook what has been done by the New England Glass Company.

Convinced of the importance of scientific skill in their business, they
secured some years ago the services of Mr. Leighton and his three sons,
at a liberal compensation. Besides possessing the best practical
knowledge, they had also artistic taste, which enabled them to give
elegant finish to their workmanship, and to introduce new and more
beautiful patterns into it.

They did not neglect, however, the more homely but useful articles; but
executed orders for large and heavy objects for druggists' and chemical
wares and philosophical apparatus, so satisfactorily as to secure a
monopoly in them. Their richly cut, gilded, colored, and ornamental
glass is considered equal to European work.

John L. Gillerland, late of the Brooklyn Glass-Works, is remarkably
skilful in mixing metal. He has succeeded in producing the most
brilliant glass of refractory power, which is so difficult to obtain. A
gold medal was awarded his glass, in face of European competition, at
the Great International Exhibition in London, 1852. In making rich
glass, the gaffer or foreman must understand the science of chemistry
sufficiently well to mix and purify his materials in the best possible
manner, removing all crude or foreign matter, and combining the proper
substances into a homogeneous mass. Without this practical experience
and knowledge, his glass, instead of being clear and brilliant, and of
uniform color, will be dull, and of many hues or shades. It is
important also that his personal character be such as to command the
respect of the workmen.


LENSES.

Optical glasses have engaged the attention and investigation of
scientific men for centuries. We read of the wonderful exploits of the
burning lens of Archimedes, and find the remains of lenses thousands of
years old in the ruins of Nineveh, Babylon, and Pompeii. They are of
the utmost importance in the science of astronomy. The slow progress
made in perfecting them shows the inherent difficulties that exist in
obtaining glass of the required purity. One of these is the different
specific gravities of the material used. Hence the lower part of a pot
of melted glass is of greater specific gravity than the top, causing a
tendency to cords or threads, an evil which science has yet to learn to
overcome. Not even the large bounty offered by the English Government
and the Board of Longitude has been successful in effecting any
important improvement in this branch of manufacture. Munich enjoys the
reputation of producing the best lenses, and consequently the finest
telescopes. Sir Isaac Newton, Gregory, Dolland, Keir, and others
adopted lenses made from flint- and from crown-glass, it being
necessary to use both in the construction of achromatic telescopes, one
possessing as small and the other as great dispersive powers relative
to the mean refractive powers as can be procured. But the inherent
defect of the lenses still remained. M. Macquer remarks, "The
correction of this fault appears therefore to be very difficult." He
had tried in vain to remove it by very long fusion and fierce fire.
Others have found this by experience not to correct, but to augment the
evil. Mr. Keir is of opinion that some new composition must be
discovered, which, along with a sufficient refractive power, shall
possess a greater uniformity of texture.

Since then, it is certain some improvement has been made in the
composition for lenses. In an English paper we find the
following:--"One of the most remarkable optical lenses of modern
manufacture is that produced by Messrs. Chance, English manufacturers,
being an attempt by them to improve the manufacture of glass for
optical purposes. The diameter is twenty-nine inches, and it is two
inches and a quarter thick. It is really not a lens, but a plain disk
intended for a lens, should its quality be sufficiently fine. The
weight is about two hundred pounds. This piece of glass was inspected,
on its first public exhibition, by eminent scientific judges. It was
by them examined edgewise, transversely, and obliquely; it was viewed
by daylight and by candle-light; it was tested by the polariscope and
by other means; and after having been thus subjected to a severe
ordeal, it was pronounced to be the largest and finest known specimen
of the kind."

The promise held out by the foregoing we fear has failed, as in very
many previous cases, or the world ere this time would have heard of its
success. An achromatic object-glass for telescopes consists of at least
two lenses, the one made of flint-glass, and the other of crown-glass.
The former, possessing least power of dispersing the colored rays
relative to its mean refractive power, must be of greater value than
the latter. It is upon this principle that the achromatism of the
image is produced, the different colored rays being united into one
focus. Flint-glass, to be fit for this delicate purpose, must be
perfectly homogeneous, of uniform density throughout its substance, and
free from wavy veins or cords.

From the foregoing, the reader will see that, as has been said, the
chief difficulty which exists in making telescopic lenses arises from
want of pure glass. Every attempt to correct this evil has failed; it
is well known our best telescopes and like optical instruments have
always achromatic lenses, and for photographic purposes achromatic
lenses are indispensable. If philosophers and astronomers have with so
imperfect lenses attained so much, what may not the astronomer look for
when science gives him lenses made from pure glass? If the heavens, by
imperfect instruments, have so far been unveiled, to what extent may he
not then be able to penetrate the pure ether, and reveal planets and
heavenly bodies as yet unknown?

We close our reminiscences of Glass and its manufacture, by presenting
to our readers a view of an American model glass factory of the present
day.[4] By comparing this view with the sketches heretofore given of
the early Venetian and French factories, they will perceive the very
great improvement which is apparent over the ancient plans, an
improvement conducing alike to the health and comfort of the workmen.
Thirty years have passed in its development, during which many
difficulties arose from the conflicting opinions of the English and
German glass-makers; and, in fact, it was not until the proprietors
boldly separated themselves from the current and influence of old, and
almost fixed opinions, that any decided progress was shown in the
development of manufacturing efficiency, or any plan contributing to
the health and comfort of the workmen employed.

          [4] See drawing No. 4, at end of book.

It is to be borne in mind that the first glass works in this country
were established by the Germans, who used no other fuel than wood, the
furnaces for window-glass constructed under their directions being for
that fuel only; on the other hand, the English workmen who introduced
the making of flint-glass had made use of no other fuel than coal, and
the English were therefore obliged to adopt (for the want of coal) the
German plan for furnaces, and adapt the same to the making of
flint-glass. The house was like the furnace, half English and half
German, and from the year 1812, for thirty years, little or no
improvement was made in this particular. Year after year the old plan
was followed, until necessity paved the way for new plans in the effort
to secure a less expensive mode of melting glass.

The result has been highly favorable. More than one half has been saved
in the melt, annealing leers, and working places, yielding the workmen
greater space and facilities in performing their work, and no longer
exposing them to the discomfort of extra heat, smoke, and unhealthy
gases. These improvements have enabled the American manufacturer to
sustain his business in the severe and trying competition with foreign
manufacturers, who forced their glass into this country through their
agents a few years since, in such quantities, and at such reduced
prices, as seriously to affect the prosperity of our artisans; yet,
aided as they have been by a tariff directly promoting foreign
interest, and by the very low rates of wages paid on the Continent,
they have been successfully contended with, and now a home competition
has sprung up, reducing prices below a fair standard,--a competition,
the result of enterprise, which will, erelong, regulate itself, for we
fully hold to the maxim, that competition, honest and well sustained,
is the soul and life of business:--

    "No horse so swift that he needs not another
    To keep up his speed."

There is no mechanical employment in this country yielding so good
returns to the industrious as a good worker in glass, of the present
day, can secure in the exercise of his skill. And we may still further
say that there is no mechanical branch of industry offering such
advantages for the full manifestation of a workman's real skill and
industry, if the conventional usages which restrict the work could but
be abrogated,--usages tending to a limited amount of work, and
consequently making the workman to realize but a limited amount per
week. Such workmen, of all others, should be allowed the inherent and
inalienable right to work as long, and at such times, as the individual
may deem for his comfort and interest.

We have expressed the opinion that the manufacture of glass is as yet
but in its infancy. The experience of every day confirms the assertion,
and illustrates the maxim that "life is short, art is long."

The time is not far distant when this country will become, we think,
the largest exporter of glass, and the manufacture compose a most
important item in every assorted export cargo. In this connection a
hint to ship-owners may not be amiss. It is well known that in England,
when a ship is put up for a foreign port, it is the custom to rate the
freight according to the value of the merchandise,--dry goods paying
the highest freight, hardware the next highest, earthen and glass ware
the lowest. If our merchants would adopt this plan, very many of our
bulky manufactures would find a market abroad; when, however, the same
rate is required for a cask of glass ware as for a case of silks or
prints, it taxes the latter a small percentage, but practically vetoes
the export of the glass.

Our task is now ended; our object has been to give a simple and
succinct outline of the characteristics and progress of the Glass
Manufacture, to suggest such hints as might bear upon the further
advance of the art, and the preservation of those practically
identified with the manufacture, and, if possible, to attract the
attention of those hitherto unacquainted with its nature and history.
If we have neglected the maxim that "_those who live in glass houses_,"
&c., it has not been from the want of honest endeavors to remember it;
and if we have contributed either to the instruction or the pleasure of
any reader, (and this is our hope,) we shall not regret the hours spent
in the preparation of this little work.




APPENDIX.


RECEIPTS, ETC.

There are plenty of receipts for the composition of flint or crystal
glass, but no mixture that we know can secure a uniform shade in each
pot. The component parts of glass are well known, and the mixer's sure
guide is to watch the effect of heat on each pot, for he soon finds the
mixture that gives good color in one pot will in another in the same
furnace prove bad. If he possesses sufficient knowledge of the chemical
causes, he can correct the evil.

Among the valuable receipts for rich colors is the following, for
RUBY GLASS, which takes lead both in cost and richness:--

Take one ounce of pure gold; dissolve in a glass vessel two ounces pure
sal ammoniac acid, and five ounces of pure nitric acid, which will take
six to seven days; drop in at a time say one twentieth part of the
gold. When the first piece is dissolved, drop in another twentieth
portion of the gold, and so on until the ounce of gold is all
dissolved. This will require twenty-four hours. Evaporate the solution
to dryness. Then prepare in a glass vessel six ounces pure nitric acid,
two ounces muriatic acid, and one ounce of highest proof alcohol; mix
them well together, and drop in pure grained tin a bit at a time,
_but beware of the fumes_. Stir it well with a glass rod; dilute
the solution with eighty times its bulk of distilled water; then take
the prepared gold, dissolved in a quart of distilled water, and pour it
steadily into the solution of tin as above prepared, stirring all the
while. Let it settle twenty-four to thirty hours; pour off the water,
leave the settlings, pour in two thirds of a quart of water. Stir it
thoroughly; let it settle thirty hours; pour off as before, and filter
the precipitate through filtering paper. The result is the purple of
Crassus. The ounce of gold thus prepared must be well incorporated with
the following batch: say thirty-two pounds fine silex, thirty-six
pounds oxide of lead, sixteen pounds refined nitre; melt the same in a
clean pot, one little used, and smooth inside; when filled in, put the
stopper to the pot loose, leaving it slightly open; leave it five or
six hours, or time to settle, then a back stopper can be put up. In the
usual time it will be ready to be worked out in solid, egg-shaped
balls, and exposed to the air to be partially cooled; they are then to
be placed in the leer under a strong fire, which will in two or three
hours turn them to a red color; then the pans may be drawn slowly to
anneal the balls.

It is well known to mixers that colored glass is derived from metallic
oxides. To obtain the proper color depends on the purity and strength
of the metallic oxides. The following receipts have with success been
used:--

ALABASTER.

    To  500 lbs. of batch add
         30  "   phosphate of soda,
         10  "   allumine,--_i.e._ calcined alum,
          3  "   calcined magnesia.

BLACK.

    To 1400 lbs. of batch add
        180  "   manganese,
        100  "   calcined iron scales, made fine,
         20  "   powdered charcoal,
         10  "   arsenic.

CANARY.

    To 100 lbs. of batch add
         8 ounces best oxide of uranium,
         1 dr. oxide of copper.

The common colors of purple, blue, emerald, or green, are too well
known to require to be repeated here.

The following receipt for crystal glass is on the European standard,
viz.:--

    1200 lbs. silex,
     800  "   red lead,
     440  "   pearlash,
      50  "   nitre,
      10  "   phosphate of lime,
      10 oz.  white oxide of antimony,
      24  "   manganese,
      32  "   arsenic,
      20  "   borax.


GERMAN SHEET GLASS.

    400 lbs. silex,
    130  "   soda,
    126  "   hydrate of lime,
      4  "   charcoal,
      7  "   nitrate of soda,
      4  "   arsenic,
      1  "   manganese.

Gold-colored spangles may be diffused through the glass by mixing
gold-colored talcs in the batch.

AGATE.

    To 150 lbs. flint batch add
        10  "   phosphate of lime,
         6  "   arsenic.

BLACK.

    600 lbs. flint batch,
     40  "   manganese,
     46  "   oxide of iron.

LIGHT EMERALD GREEN.

    200     lbs. flint batch,
      2-1/2  "  iron filings, calcined,
        1/2  "  antimony.

ORIENTAL GREEN.

    110 lbs. flint batch,
      1  "   oxide of uranium,
      2 oz.  carbonate of copper.

OPAL.

    500 lbs. batch,
     60  "   phosphate of lime,
      4  "   arsenic,
     20  "   nitrate of soda.

Said to turn without cooling.

William Gillender, of England, gives the following receipt for Bohemian
Red, or Ruby:--

    Sand,     62 lbs.
    Lead,     76  "
    Nitre,    22  "
    Antimony,  8 oz.
    Manganese, 3 "

Add one ounce of purple of Crassus to every eighty pounds of the above
batch.

WAX RED.

    To 15   lbs. flint batch add
        1    "   raw brass,
         3/4 "   crocus martus.

This he says is very good.

TURQUOISE.

    To 1100 lbs. flint batch add
         90  "   phosphate of lime,
         15  "   arsenic,
         15  "   calcined brass dust.

VIOLET.

    To  100    lbs. flint batch add
          1     "   calcined brass,
          1-1/2 "   zaffre.

Receipts for window-glass are as numerous as for flint. The following
are in general use in England, so says Gillender:--

CROWN GLASS.

    Sand,            1400 lbs.
    Quick lime,       480  "
    Sulphate of soda, 560  "
    Charcoal,          25  "

PLATE GLASS.

    Sand,             300 lbs.
    Sulphate of soda, 450  "
    Quick lime,       100  "
    Nitre,             25  "
    Charcoal,           5  "

DIAMOND GLASS.

Four pounds of borax, one pound of fine sand; reduce both to a subtile
powder, and melt them together in a closed crucible set in an air
furnace, under a strong fire, till fusion is perfect. Let it cool in
the crucible, and a pure, hard glass, capable of cutting common glass
like a diamond, which it rivals in brilliancy, is produced.


LEAD.

Lead is an important and costly ingredient of flint-glass, used as a
protoxide, either as litharge or red lead, and should be perfectly
pure, for the presence of any other substance or metal will be shown in
the color of the glass. Consequently, the purity of the glass depends
mainly on the quality of the metallic lead and its being well
manufactured.

The writer believes he was the first person in the United States, aided
by a director of the New England Glass Company, to build a lead
furnace. This was in 1818. His only guide was a volume of "Cooper's
Emporium of Arts and Sciences," which furnished a plan on a very
limited scale.

The furnace proved successful, and enabled the Company to continue
their manufacture of glass at a period when no foreign red lead was to
be procured. They enlarged their works, until they have become the most
important in the country; while for over thirty years they monopolized
the business in all its branches, from the highest qualities of pure
Galena and painter's red lead to common pig lead. In manufacturing
metallic lead, its weight is materially increased by the absorption of
oxygen gas. In 1847 the writer made many test experiments, one as
follows: 660 pigs of blue lead, weighing 45,540 pounds, turned out from
the ovens 48,750 pounds of litharge,--an increase in weight of 3210
pounds.

The cost of labor was $65.50; fuel, $86.50; engine power, $17.50;
total, $169.50; and the market value of the excess in weight of the
lead was $250, showing a satisfactory profit to the company for their
outlay in this branch of their business. Chemistry gives the increase
in course of manufacture: In protoxide state, 7 per cent.; in deutoxide
state, 11 per cent.; in tritoxide, 15 per cent.

Muriatic acid will detect iron in lead, on dissolving a small piece of
lead in the acid. If colorless, it is good.

Nitric acid will detect if there is cobalt in the lead, by adding to
the acid half the quantity of high-proof alcohol. If present, the
evidence is soon seen.

Some use the following as more direct:--In a small evaporating glass
dish place say one ounce of lead; cover it with muriatic acid; dissolve
the lead over a spirit lamp, add a little water, and let it settle;
draw it off into another glass vessel, and add five or six drops of the
solution of potash. If the lead is suitable for glass-makers, the
solution will be of a light, clear, greenish color; if of a blue or
purple shade, it is not suitable for flint-glass.


SAND, OR SILEX.

In the manufacture of glass it is essential that the silex should be
perfectly pure, as the slightest mineral taint affects the color.

At first the New England factories got their sand from Demerara,
brought as ballast, and the quality was good. During the War of 1812
this source of supply was cut off, but Plymouth beach provided for the
wants of the manufacturers, until a better sand was discovered at
Morris River, N.J., though not up to the full requirement of the art.
For ten years past, Berkshire County. Mass., has furnished sand; the
best quality is owned by G. W. Gordon, Esq. By thorough washing, and
passing it through fine sieves, and proper packing, he now commands the
market, and delivers it ready for use. The purity has been tested, as
shown by the following extract from a report by Professor A. A. Hayes,
M.D., of Boston, Massachusetts State Assayer, of the result of analyses
of three samples of Berkshire sand, taken from three different
locations owned by Mr. Gordon, viz.:--

"For the manufacture of glass, the slight amount of earth, in mica and
tourmaline, contained in these samples, is of no account, the impurity
being such oxides as color glass. The analyses therefore give only the
proportion of coloring oxides; and, for simplicity of statement, the
total weight of coloring oxide in each sample is determined in one part
or pound.

    "Sample B analyses: 4000 parts of this sample contain one part
                        of oxide of iron.

     Sample C analyses: 3333 parts of this sample contain one part
                        of oxide of iron.

     Sample P analyses: 3460 parts of this sample contain one part
                        of oxide of iron.

"Sample B is equal in purity to the best sand known as a material for
glass, in this or any other country."


FURNACES.

Next to pots, furnaces are most important for the success of a glass
manufactory. Long ago it was seen that the old English plan was
defective. They consumed coal at an extravagant rate, though this was
not a serious drawback in England, because the furnaces were located
near coal-mines, and run with a quality called slack, not otherwise
merchantable. English furnaces were constructed with reference to
durability, usually eight feet in diameter at the interior base, and
six feet clear at the crown. This rule was followed in this country
until 1840. The writer, having occasion to build an extra furnace,
adopted the novel plan of one fourteen feet diameter at the base in the
clear and only five feet at the crown, braced by binders, with
cross-ties to prevent lateral expansion, which was a success.

A furnace on the old plan consumed 2575 bushels of coal weekly, and
refined only 38,000 pounds of raw material. The new refined 35,000
pounds, with a consumption of only 2000 bushels of coal. Since then a
further decrease in consumption of coal has been produced by the use of
the Delano patent, which feeds the furnace by forcing up the coal at
the bottom of the burning mass, thus consuming the entire smoke, and
obviating the necessity of wheeling coal on the glass-house floor and
impeding the workmen. It also does away with all danger to the pots in
feeding the fires. Besides these great advantages, it distributes a
regular and uniform heat to each pot, causing the pots to last much
longer, and fusing the metal better,--important items to mixers.

From three to five tons of fuel is the weekly saving in a first-class
furnace.

It is of vital importance to obtain pots that will last a reasonable
time. Clays of the finest quality are essential. Each piece must be
freed from any foreign matter, particularly sulphate of iron, which
often occurs. The burnt and raw clay should be well mixed, wet, and
frequently kneaded, or trod over by the naked feet. Tenacity must be
secured, sufficient that a roll twelve to eighteen inches long can be
suspended, and hold firmly together by its own adhesiveness. The next
point is to make the pots free from air blisters, all portions being
compact; then to dry them thoroughly, which requires great care on
account of the inequality of the different parts. Pot-makers are not
agreed as to the value of different clays, and the use and proportion
of raw to burnt shells. Some use sixteen parts raw to eleven burnt,
some fifty-five raw to forty-five burnt, some equal proportions of
each.

Manufacturers have mainly depended upon imported clays, but the Western
glass-makers have used Missouri clay with success. In the east it has
not yet come into general use. Of the imported, that from Stowbridge is
considered best. Garnkerk is a strong clay, and, if well selected, will
rival any other. The analyses are for

STOWBRIDGE,

    Silica,  64 parts,
    Alumina, 20   "
    Lime,     1   "
    Iron,     3   "

GERMAN,

    Silica,  46 parts,
    Alumina, 34   "
    Iron,     3   "

GARNKERK,

    Silica,  53 parts,
    Alumina, 43   "
    Lime,     1   "
    Iron,     1   "

FRENCH,

    Silica,  40 parts,
    Alumina, 31   "
    Iron,     3   "

WESTERN,

    Silica,  49 to 52 parts,
    Alumina, 31 to 32   "
    Iron,     2 to  4   "


FUEL.

This subject deserves special notice. We have said that the New England
manufacturers at first used wood only, which was prepared by being
split into equal lengths, with an average diameter of two inches, and
then kiln-dried to dispel the sap and moisture. This fuel was supplied
to the furnace at opposite fire-holes, a stick at a time, which was a
laborious and heating process.

Subsequently, a furnace was built at South Boston, over a cave, and
unkilned wood was used in clefts. This saved one quarter in fuel, but
it used up the pots so rapidly as to prove to be no economy in the end.
After the development of the Virginia coal mines, our furnaces were
altered to use coal, which proved to be more convenient and less costly
than wood. The Pictou and Cumberland mines also increased the supply;
and at present all the furnaces in New England, with one exception, are
run with this last-named fuel.

The various experiments made to economize fuel for the "glory-holes,"
as the workmen call the working places above the furnace, are well
known. For many years the prepared wood we have spoken of was used.
Then resin in a powdered state was added, which was both inconvenient
and dangerous,--it having caused the destruction by burning of two
glass-houses. This risk was finally overcome by the introduction of an
invention which used it in a liquid state. But the demand for resin
became so great as soon to more than double its price. This led to the
substitution of coal tar, which was in use until science discovered its
latent virtues for other purposes, and largely increased the original
cost of the material. Indeed, at first the gas companies had considered
it of no value, and had thrown it away by thousands of barrels.
Combined with dead oil it is still used by glass-makers, but at greatly
enhanced prices.

The Cape Cod Glass Company have had in use for several years a Delano
patent furnace-feeder, which enables them to use both hard and soft
coal, as either is cheapest, and consumes the smoke and gas of either
fuel, thus doing away all annoyance to the neighborhood. Theretofore
every attempt to run working places with hard or soft coal had failed
on account of the noxious gases set free, which injure the color of the
glass. But owing to the intense heat created by the Delano patent, the
furnace consumes these gases, and gives a quick fire polish to the
various articles finished therein.

As our native supplies of hard and soft coal are inexhaustible, there
is no likelihood of an increase in the price of the present fuel so as
to necessitate, as heretofore, a substitution of some cheaper article,
especially as the discovery of petroleum tends to cheapen coal by a
diversion of a portion of its consumption to that useful mineral oil.


USEFUL ITEMS.

A bushel of English coal weighs 80 pounds: of Virginia coal, 93 pounds;
of Pictou, 76 pounds; of Cumberland, 84 pounds; of red ash, hard, 84
pounds.

Crude saltpetre, refined, loses nine per cent.

Chemists estimate that one hundred pounds of pearlash contain thirty
per cent. carbonic acid. In refining, it loses on the average fifteen
per cent. in weight.

Phosphate of soda brightens glass.

Borax brightens, but hardens glass.

Twenty-five silver dollars refined will give thirty-seven ounces of
nitrate of silver.

A square foot of furnace clay weighs one hundred and twenty pounds.

Alum, calcined, loses in weight sixty per cent.

Crude flint batch, melted and ladled out, loses in the average fifteen
per cent. in weight.

Hard coal will measure forty cubic feet to a gross ton.

Glass in water. There are some peculiar phenomena connected with hot
glass and water. If a ball of red-hot iron is placed in a vessel
containing cold water, the latter is quickly agitated. But a ball of
melted glass of equal weight dropped in cold water will produce no
immediate agitation. The water will remain for some time quiescent; but
when the glass is cooled to about half its highest temperature, it
agitates the cold water violently.

Technical terms, descriptive of glass, such as crystal, flint, tale,
may be derived from these facts: the French used for their base crystal
stones, burnt and ground fine; in England they had recourse only to
flint stone, treated the same as the French used their blocks of
crystal; tale was derived from the mode of selling, the best glass
being sold only by weight, while light articles were sold tale.

[Illustration]






End of Project Gutenberg's Reminiscences of Glass-making, by Deming Jarves

*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK REMINISCENCES OF GLASS-MAKING ***

***** This file should be named 44284-8.txt or 44284-8.zip *****
This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
        http://www.gutenberg.org/4/4/2/8/44284/

Produced by the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
generously made available by The Internet Archive)


Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
will be renamed.

Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
redistribution.



*** START: FULL LICENSE ***

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
  www.gutenberg.org/license.


Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works

1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.  See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
States.

1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org

1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
1.E.9.

1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.

1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg-tm License.

1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
that

- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."

- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
     License.  You must require such a user to return or
     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
     Project Gutenberg-tm works.

- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
     of receipt of the work.

- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.

1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
your equipment.

1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.


Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm

Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org


Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.

The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at 809
North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887.  Email
contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

For additional contact information:
     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
     Chief Executive and Director
     [email protected]

Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
To donate, please visit:  www.gutenberg.org/donate


Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone.  For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:

     www.gutenberg.org

This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.